• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

US Power Will Decline Under Trump, Says Sociologist Who Predicted Soviet Collapse

Status
Not open for further replies.

Noema

Member
"Galtung has doctoral degrees in both sociology and mathematics, and some decades ago developed a theory of “synchronizing and mutually reinforcing contradictions”, which he used to make his forecasts,"

So basically he is Hari Seldon in real life.
 

Usobuko

Banned
The last thing the whole world wants is US influences increase under Trump. No, we don't want to follow US lead in fighting climate change.

Ok, maybe just me and not everyone else.
 

Espada

Member
As long as America has a strong military, American power wouldn't decline. It might become less visible ubder Trump but wouldn't decline. And Trump is all for pumping more money in the military.

Most of our power is soft power, economic power, and having a network of allies that enable us to project power worldwide.

Doing things that hurt our soft power, make our allies wary of us, and making economically poor decisions hurt our overall might more than anything that might happen to the military.
 
Most of our power is soft power, economic power, and having a network of allies that enable us to project power worldwide.

Doing things that hurt our soft power, make our allies wary of us, and making economically poor decisions hurt our overall might more than anything that might happen to the military.

One could also argue that USA's trust in it's military power worked like a catalyst in the post 9/11 world.
 
I think Trump is a disaster, but this guy sounds like a crackpot semi-conspiracy theorist. The article reads like the script of those History Channel shows on Nostradamus.

Actually very few geopolitics theorist have good prediction. Even Huntington had pretty low batting average in his books.
 

Ac30

Member
The European Union is practically on life support. I am of the opinion that the EU will cease to exist within 10 years.

The EU won't cease to exist, but gridlock will render it non-functional. NATO falling apart seems a more pressing concern, because Germany, France and Trump are totally going to go to war over Albania...

Countries are still signing on to the EU. The bigger 'problem' is the UK ATM, since they're bumbling about like headless chickens and dragging the rest of us with them. Idiots.
 
Reaction from my Republican friends on Facebook: "America was already on decline. Any moron could see that and it has nothing to do with Trump."

Yep, this country is a lost cause.
 
It's going to be really hard to tank a country such as USA like so. There's no other country in the world with the systems in place to handle what USA would release if it went under. If the USA started to tank then other countries would help prop it up. Forget understanding the economical fallout that would occur, you would see MUCH more hostility between countries.

USA is one empire that won't topple anytime soon. Everyone's too invested in it.

The USA is a the personification of "you need me more than I need you". So who will flinch first?
 

Effect

Member
A potential breakup of the United States into various groups or a confederation has always been the most interesting for me whenever this topic comes up. It doesn't at all feel impossible. If anything the US is already broken up like that for the most part when you really look the various states and regions of the US. They're sometimes very different and even though they share state borders. I always wonder how things would be if states in different regions decided collectively they had enough and wanted more autonomy from the others.
 

Knoxcore

Member
I think everyone saw this coming. The peak of American power was immediately after 9/11. Wars in the middle east, economic recession, political polarization and increasing inequality has only exacerbated the collapse of our hegemony. 2020 seems like a nice round number for the transfer of that hegemony from the USA to the EU (assuming changes) or China.
 
The problem is that the USA is the hostility for innovation and future economic shifts.

Renewable energy is dominated by Chinese companies.
China outspends everyone in robotics and automation.
And things that China is already the largest market for e-cars or the political will to do super sized science projects like building the fastest supercomputers to research facilities.

Western civilization focuses too much on 4-year election cycle and quarterly profit report; Eastern civilization plans for longer terms.

This is also reflected on education investment.
 

Horns

Member
I don't have a fancy degree, but I could have told you that. Republicans are concerned with keeping things as they used to be which holds back natural progress.
 
Which leads to the bigger question:
Should people learn Hindu or Chinese?

Automation will hit India quite hard.

China and the rest of the world will make the shift to large scale automation of manufactoring through all fields when India hit it's demopgrahic sweet spot.
 

FZZ

Banned
Which leads to the bigger question:
Should people learn Hindu or Chinese?

Chinese

See Pakistan buddying up with China tho, so Hindi/Urdu might be a thing as well lmao

And ofc India is going to be a major player regardless
 
The European Union is practically on life support. I am of the opinion that the EU will cease to exist within 10 years.

People that don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Let's all just forget that European peace and stability was built on the pillars of NATO and the EU (plus its forebears).
 

Zips

Member
Pretty clear that this is happening. Trump will help ensure it does not go smoothly. He might even have a clear break where he tries to start a war of some sort, and having pissed off the U.S's allies already, they flat out say no to offering support.
 
It's going to be really hard to tank a country such as USA like so. There's no other country in the world with the systems in place to handle what USA would release if it went under. If the USA started to tank then other countries would help prop it up. Forget understanding the economical fallout that would occur, you would see MUCH more hostility between countries.

USA is one empire that won't topple anytime soon. Everyone's too invested in it.

The USA is a the personification of "you need me more than I need you". So who will flinch first?

It's not about toppling United States the country, it's about US losing its dominant global influence and retreat back to pre-wwII status.
 
It's not about toppling United States the country, it's about US losing its dominant global influence and retreat back to pre-wwII status.

It's already happening in the Philippines. And the South Pacific in general really. Maintaining hegemony there was what the TPP was all about.
 
Yep, this is plain as day. America is going to be taking a backseat to China in the very near future. Possibly Russia as well, if Putin has his way - Which he likely will with his lapdog in the white house.

The people who claim to be the most patriotic just put the final nail in our coffin.
 
It's going to be really hard to tank a country such as USA like so. There's no other country in the world with the systems in place to handle what USA would release if it went under. If the USA started to tank then other countries would help prop it up. Forget understanding the economical fallout that would occur, you would see MUCH more hostility between countries.

USA is one empire that won't topple anytime soon. Everyone's too invested in it.

The USA is a the personification of "you need me more than I need you". So who will flinch first?

This raises an interesting question; if the U.S. was struggling with internal violent conflict, would other countries send military forces to assist the government? I feel like U.S. pride would never accept that.
 
I would be more worried if everyone on GAF disagreed with this. The collective "he's right!" from the group that was sure that Hillary was going to win is sort of a sure contrarian bet.

Meanwhile the US consumer confidence index (released today) is at the highest its been in 12 years, the US stock market is at record highs - the DJIA up nearly 8% since just the election - the US dollar is at record strength, the US business confidence is at record highs, oil prices seem stable even after OPEC agreed to a cartel supply cut, and china has a host of problems to combat next year that make the US's seem trivial in contrast: massive corporate debt mostly held by state owned companies, real estate growth issues, and a real slowdown in household consumption.
 

PantherLotus

Professional Schmuck
Feel like this key quote defining why he cracked the USSR collapse is being overlooked.

In the case of the USSR, the main structural contradictions were as follows: the working class was increasingly repressed and unable to self-organise through trade unions (ironic given the country’s Communist pretensions); the wealthier ‘bourgeoisie’ or elite had money to spend, but nothing to buy from domestic production, leading to economic stagnation; Russian intellectuals wanted more freedom of expression; minorities wanted more autonomy; and peasants wanted more freedom of movement

What structural contradictions does the US have?

  • economic contradictions such as ‘overproduction relative to demand’, unemployment and the increasing costs of climate change;
  • military contradictions including rising tensions between the US, NATO, and its military allies, along with the increasing economic unsustainability of war;
  • political contradictions including the conflicting roles of the US, UN and EU;
  • cultural contradictions including tensions between US Judeo-Christianity, Islam, and other minorities;
  • and social contradictions encompassing the increasing gulf between the so-called ‘American Dream’, the belief that everyone can prosper in America through hard work, and the reality of American life (the fact that more and more people can’t).

Oh, oh yeah. I can get on board with these.

Jesus.
 

Joni

Member
The European Union is practically on life support. I am of the opinion that the EU will cease to exist within 10 years.
Which would completely cripple Europe and make it absolutely defenseless so let's hope you are wrong. It needs to become stronger, even if it's just with the seven to eight core countries.
 
What kind of silly endgame is that supposed to be?

A realistic one with Trump and co. leading the nation.

Step 1) alienate our allies and weaken our presence in the global market by withdrawing from trade deals

Step 2) blame foreign influence (China) for the decline of our economy and status around the world. Funnel all tax payer resources into our military.

Step 3) After a couple of years of extreme economy hardship, the government will be "forced" to enact War with China. After all, they are the "reason" why the US is collapsing.

Step 4) War with China will be swift but catastrophic. Nations wiped off the map, new allies, new treaties, new era for the modern world.
 

Apzu

Member
Will that lead to a new Cold War, but this time between China's own version of commuinsm and India's different idea of democracy? It would be quite interesting to see some western ideas being defended by another former british colony.
 

boiled goose

good with gravy
I agree with the contradictions premise.

Income inequality GREW under Obama. Economic gains are all going to the top.
Half the country buys into GOP lies regarding tax breaks for the rich, deregulation.
We are not investing enough domestically in education and scientific research.

There is a shit storm coming. Trump is part of it.
 
A realistic one with Trump and co. leading the nation.

Step 1) alienate our allies and weaken our presence in the global market by withdrawing from trade deals

Step 2) blame foreign influence (China) for the decline of our economy and status around the world. Funnel all tax payer resources into our military.

Step 3) After a couple of years of extreme economy hardship, the government will be "forced" to enact War with China. After all, they are the "reason" why the US is collapsing.

Step 4) War with China will be swift but catastrophic. Nations wiped off the map, new allies, new treaties, new era for the modern world.

China's GDP just exceeded ours and now we are going to start a war isn't realistic at all. Which of the USA allies in Asia would support such a move?
 

FZZ

Banned
You think Trump cares about ally support?

US isn't some bad ass kid that can do whatever they damn well please lmfao

this shit is some alt right baby's wet dream or something

If no one wants to do any business with the US, which would definitely happen if we even come close to trying something like this, we'd be fucked. China is our biggest economic resource.
 

JordanN

Banned
So the Russian guy was right and we'll see the dissolution of the USSA

V5J1WYN.gif
 

Guileless

Temp Banned for Remedial Purposes
Oh, oh yeah. I can get on board with these.

Jesus.

Every Western democracy has these to some degree. The US is in a stronger position than Western Europe due to the dollar being a reserve currency and its geographic isolation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom