• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Sony Is Planning To Release About 2-3 Vita Games Per Month

So there will be like 6 more games before it's dead

lmfao

but whats funny is that sony is famous for over promising and under delivering. so if they're only promising 2-3 games per month, in reality you can really only hope for a GT5 like scenario where they release a "prologue" every month (on the good side).

and they might be counting "updates" as games, too.
 

Kuran

Banned
lmfao

but whats funny is that sony is famous for over promising and under delivering. so if they're only promising 2-3 games per month, in reality you can really only hope for a GT5 like scenario where they release a "prologue" every month (on the good side).

and they might be counting "updates" as games, too.

HAHAHA LOLOLOL YEAH YEAH HAHAHA
 

Dragon

Banned
lmfao

but whats funny is that sony is famous for over promising and under delivering. so if they're only promising 2-3 games per month, in reality you can really only hope for a GT5 like scenario where they release a "prologue" every month (on the good side).

and they might be counting "updates" as games, too.

Sony is famous for charging a high amount for their hardware. I don't know what you're referring to with the sentence in bold though.
 
So, based on a quick google search, Sony's announced games are:

Launch Day:
-Uncharted: Golden Abyss
-Hot Shots Golf: World Invitational
-Little Deviants
-ModNation Racers: Road Trip
-WipEout 2048
-Escape Plan (PSN Only)
-Hustle Kings (PSN Only)
-Super StarDust Delta (PSN Only)
-Motorstorm RC (PSN Only)

Launch "Window":
-Gravity Rush
-MLB 12 The Show
-Reality Fighters
-Unit 13

Other:
-LittleBigPlanet Vita
-Resistance: Burning Skies
-Warrior's Lair (Ruin)
-Killzone Vita
-Media Molecule's Game (Technically Unannounced)

Presumably, to keep this up, they will need to announce some more games sooner than later.
There's also Sound Shapes.
 
Didn't they learn with the PSP...? ah well...

Ports are really going to get people to go out and buy a Vita...

who said anything about ports exclusively?
Please learn to rea*looks at Pikmin avatar* oh well carry on then! your portable 3DS Pikmin game is arriving soon so you must be pumped about that, no doubt!
 

jgmo870

Banned
A healthy mix of big retail purchases and new downloadable games like Escape Plan will make the Vita my go to handheld for sure.
 
It's no go for the PSP because it didn't have a two analog stick. It was a gimped experience. If it was totally no go then games such as FFT, Disgaea, Persona 3, God of War, and so on wouldn't be good on the PSP. Those games weren't gimped in controls.
 

DCharlie

And even i am moderately surprised
wasn't this a not-so-great strategy for OG PSP? i wanna see original shit, especially when android stuff starts rolling out.

there's not original shit out already or coming out on the Vita?
 

Patapwn

Member
Didn't they learn with the PSP...? ah well...

Ports are really going to get people to go out and buy a Vita...

Learn what? The article (and title) states that sony promises a steady stream of games. I guess we've reached the day when promising games can be spun into a bad thing... ah well...

And considering you're not aware of the vita's launch lineup/ launch period, the system has far more than a couple of ports.
 

F#A#Oo

Banned
who said anything about ports exclusively?
Please learn to rea*looks at Pikmin avatar* oh well carry on then! your portable 3DS Pikmin game is arriving soon so you must be pumped about that, no doubt!

Pikmin Wii U? Damn straight I'm hyped...

Sony need to make handheld games not console ports...its not rocket science.
 

Takao

Banned
Pikmin Wii U? Damn straight I'm hyped...

Sony need to make handheld games not console ports...its not rocket science.

I think Sony has ported over like 1 game directly to a handheld since like the beginning of time. That game was Parappa. Ape Escape: On the Loose was a by the books remake that I'd put up with the Ocarina of Time 3Ds of the world.
 

patsu

Member
Sony need to make handheld games not console ports...its not rocket science.

They "only" need to make quality games. I don't think people care whether it's rhetorically handheld games/ports or console ports/games.

Sometimes, the line is not that clear cut to begin with.
 

IrishNinja

Member
there's not original shit out already or coming out on the Vita?

gravity daze and a few others, sure. mostly established stuff im seeing so far though: UC, wipeout, mahvel etc. i know its unfair to judge by launch lineup, i was just pointing at the strategy in general - wasnt PSP at one point marketed as something of a portable PS2? it got GTA, god of war etc but i never really thought that was the way to go, i could be wrong though.
 

DiscoJer

Member
I think Sony has ported over like 1 game directly to a handheld since like the beginning of time. That game was Parappa. Ape Escape: On the Loose was a by the books remake that I'd put up with the Ocarina of Time 3Ds of the world.

Well, in part because after the PS3 launched, they were porting games from the PSP to the PS2. (They really never made that many great games for the PS2 themselves, anyway.)

But even so, I think you can call LBP and MNR ports, and the Gran Turismo that the PSP eventually got was basically a half-assed port of GT4 - just the arcade mode with new menus and what, a dozen new cars.

And sports games, like MLB The Show. At least they started off as half-assed ports from the PS2 versions (missing features like franchise mode and umpires) then mostly just got roster updates.
 

DCharlie

And even i am moderately surprised
gravity daze and a few others, sure. mostly established stuff im seeing so far though: UC, wipeout, mahvel etc. i know its unfair to judge by launch lineup, i was just pointing at the strategy in general - wasnt PSP at one point marketed as something of a portable PS2? it got GTA, god of war etc but i never really thought that was the way to go, i could be wrong though.

well, the interesting thing is by that yard stick then the Nintendo 3DS is -much- more guilty - especially if we include upcoming games as well.

Not that it's a problem for Nintendo because that's the big plus for the system and seems to be the driver. It's just weird that whilst it's a Nintendo strength, it's perceived as a Sony weakness.

Hell , the Big Three Nintendo games in Japan : Mario Kart 7 , Mario Land 3D (genuinely new/fresh), Monster Hunter 3G (hyper expanded/improved port)
 

Mario007

Member
Never in that article is it said that Vita is getting ports. In fact the only ports Vita is getting so far are from 3rd parties, which seems to be very much in line with what 3DS had to offer. On top of that Sony is bringing new games to the table. There's a difference between bringing established brands to Vita and having too many ports. If MS made a handheld console of course everyone would want Halo to be there so it's the same with LBP, Wipeout or Uncharted.

Lastly, if Sony said they'd publish 1 game ever 2 months people here would be freaking out about how doomed Vita is because it has no games and support from Sony. Sony says they'll be bringing 2-3 games a month and people here freak out because...well they don't like Vita and/or Sony. It's really hilarious.
 

Takao

Banned
Well, in part because after the PS3 launched, they were porting games from the PSP to the PS2. (They really never made that many great games for the PS2 themselves, anyway.)

But even so, I think you can call LBP and MNR ports, and the Gran Turismo that the PSP eventually got was basically a half-assed port of GT4 - just the arcade mode with new menus and what, a dozen new cars.

And sports games, like MLB The Show. At least they started off as half-assed ports from the PS2 versions (missing features like franchise mode and umpires) then mostly just got roster updates.

There's a difference between ported content, and ported games. GT PSP is a game made up of ported content, but it in itself is not a port. Modnation Racers on PSP might have the same story mode as the PS3 game, but it handles very different, and the base mechanics aren't really similar. Heck, Modnation on PSP runs on the WipEout engine. As well, LBP is a completely different game from the PS3 one. It would be akin to saying New Super Mario Bros. Wii is a port of New Super Mario Bros. on DS. That said, I wouldn't know about the MLB games.
 

kuroshiki

Member
Why you guys arguing about this?

MGS collection and ZOE collection is updated port but whoever argues that they are not good for vita is totally out of mind.
 

Gravijah

Member
vita needs a healthy ecosystem of different titles, from ports and "hd" (heh) remakes to medium budget retail, large budget retail, smaller psn titles, etc. i really hope it all works out.
 
It should get everything it can really. Ports, stand alone games, PSN games, cross play games and etc.

The more choices the better.
 
wasn't this a not-so-great strategy for OG PSP? i wanna see original shit, especially when android stuff starts rolling out.

Android stuff? You mean you get 249$ handheld to enjoy simple games that you can also play on your phone? Vita needs games like Gravity Daze, it's incredible how good that game is. Sony should just market the shit out of this game together with: "COME AT ME BRO".

well, the interesting thing is by that yard stick then the Nintendo 3DS is -much- more guilty - especially if we include upcoming games as well.

Not that it's a problem for Nintendo because that's the big plus for the system and seems to be the driver. It's just weird that whilst it's a Nintendo strength, it's perceived as a Sony weakness.

That's because Mario passed on from being simply a franchise, to being an icon for a whole generation. 25 years of franchise development and smart spreading out titles not to dilute the brand does that. There is nothing Sony can do apart from picking a franchise, and sticking to it for 20 years. Then they might have a chance to have their own Mario, although I think Sackboy is a bad idea, but Crash was a stupid idea as well.
 

IrishNinja

Member
well, the interesting thing is by that yard stick then the Nintendo 3DS is -much- more guilty - especially if we include upcoming games as well.

Not that it's a problem for Nintendo because that's the big plus for the system and seems to be the driver. It's just weird that whilst it's a Nintendo strength, it's perceived as a Sony weakness.

Hell , the Big Three Nintendo games in Japan : Mario Kart 7 , Mario Land 3D (genuinely new/fresh), Monster Hunter 3G (hyper expanded/improved port)

fair points, but kind've an anomaly - nintendo exists on the strength of its first party stuff, for the most part.

myself, i acknowledge the great strength of the DS' library, but ironically, very little of that actually came from nintendo: i personally didn't care for their mario, zelda, metroid etc offerings on that system at all, and even successful stuff like brain age didn't move me. what did, however, was stuff i wasnt expecting at all: TWEWY, phoenix wright series, and more visual novel stuff like 999, hotel dusk and the like - stuff i didnt even think i wanted, you know?

i realize this is anecdotal, so the thread's point: i don't think the Vita's gonna explode via UC, or even Monster Hunter, to the extent sony might want. they're gonna help, no doubt, but i keep thinking a great avenue is the way they hedged their bets with android development - using your nintendo comparison, it creates a net vastly larger for capturing the next big minecraft or the like, from the ground floor.

Android stuff? You mean you get 249$ handheld to enjoy simple games that you can also play on your phone? Vita needs games like Gravity Daze, it's incredible how good that game is. Sony should just market the shit out of this game together with: "COME AT ME BRO".

i'm not gonna act like im privy to the details of the SDK kits, but i don't think developing android software for vita = for phones exactly, given inputs and the like. i think it's a much-needed effort to foster a middleware scene the likes of which non-PC gaming hasn't really seen since XBLA tried and then kinda forgot about it.
I hope you're right about Gravity Daze, i know it gets love here - not gonna speak on it till i play it though natch.

being able to play Black ops 2 on vita ONLINE with PS3 users would make me buy it for Vita.

didn't a mod just say this couldnt work on wifi, or did i misread that?
either way, maybe it's a huge untapped market, but again, i just dont see that as a great avenue for a handheld. then again, i clearly treat my DS as a visual novel reader of sorts, so my finger's clearly not on the pulse.
 
being able to play Black ops 2 on vita ONLINE with PS3 users would make me buy it for Vita.

Edit: Or they could do what Bluray movies (BLURAY/DVD/DIGITAL) do and have a copy of the PS3 game/Vita game for 80 bucks
 

freddy

Banned
If they meant first party or published by Sony they would have said it. You have to have some kind of motive for using a term as inane as first quality.
 

Takao

Banned
If they meant first party or published by Sony they would have said it. You have to have some kind of motive for using a term as inane as first quality.

Could be a bunch of reasons; Yoshida's first language is not English, and this was a lengthy interview. He could've slipped up. I'm a native speaker and I mess up my words as well. The writer could've also made a mistake in either hearing Yoshida, or while writing out the interview.

"First quality" doesn't really mean anything, so I think it's safe to assume he meant first party.
 

kevm3

Member
Never in that article is it said that Vita is getting ports. In fact the only ports Vita is getting so far are from 3rd parties, which seems to be very much in line with what 3DS had to offer. On top of that Sony is bringing new games to the table. There's a difference between bringing established brands to Vita and having too many ports. If MS made a handheld console of course everyone would want Halo to be there so it's the same with LBP, Wipeout or Uncharted.

Lastly, if Sony said they'd publish 1 game ever 2 months people here would be freaking out about how doomed Vita is because it has no games and support from Sony. Sony says they'll be bringing 2-3 games a month and people here freak out because...well they don't like Vita and/or Sony. It's really hilarious.

Exactly. Sony promises to release a decent amount of games per month:
"Sony doesn't know what they are doing. They are going to flood the market and put all their titles in the bargain bin!'

Then on the other hand if they don't release a lot of titles:
"Sony sucks. Vita has no games!"
 

Hyuga

Banned
Never in that article is it said that Vita is getting ports. .
But... but... but these people here at NeoGAF which won't even buy a VITA said they are ports!!!!!!1
And they HAVE to know it!
More games like Gravity Daze and Super Stardust Delta, less like Uncharted please.
Bullshit!
50/50, please! ;-)
This please, Unit 13 should never be developed, another stupid FPS trying to get CoD kids. Spend that money elsewhere.
And? That's a bad thing?
They're making games for everyone.
Unit 13 is looking good. How many "CoD/Unit 13" games are already out on the VITA?
 
Let's see...

In March there's Unit 13 and MLB 12, May will have Gravity Rush, so April for Sound Shapes and June for Warrior's Lair....and that's far as my crystal ball will let me see.

Yes, please.

Is Unit 13 really in march? Or is the European release of it earlier, because I have Unit 13 on my Vita right now.
 
Hopefully Sony does a better job deciding which of their first party titles should be given the retail treatment in the future. Still find it mind boggling that Reality Fighters is a retail game while something like Gravity Rush is doomed to PSN only in Europe.
 

Eusis

Member
didn't a mod just say this couldnt work on wifi, or did i misread that?
either way, maybe it's a huge untapped market, but again, i just dont see that as a great avenue for a handheld. then again, i clearly treat my DS as a visual novel reader of sorts, so my finger's clearly not on the pulse.
You must have, because I REALLY don't think multiplayer gaming would've taken off if everyone had to have wired connections. What WAS debunked was playing those games over 3G connections, so unless 4G really improves there somehow and is in the next system update cellphone internet's no good. Still means you could play a game of CoD at a Starbucks or college lounge though.
 
Top Bottom