Some people just want to bash no matter what.
How is this "hunting the CoD crowd"? It has nothing in common with CoD besides the fact that you shoot guns (and even the weapons are way different).
The trailer reminds me of Jak and Daxter with the way the character moves, a next gen version of The Precursor Legacy would be awesome.
I love the look of this game, but I'm not seeing the comparison to J&D...at all.
People have been saying they are a subpar dev since around the time Resistance 2 came out. Them making a game for Xbone has nothing to do with it.
They'll go back to being awesome when they start making good games again, if they ever actually do.
After the developments of today, Insomniac's reasoning makes little sense now.
Internet is no longer required...
After the developments of today, Insomniac's reasoning makes little sense now.
Internet is no longer required...
Insomniac Games ‏@insomniacgames
We will be hosting a live @SunsetOverdrive Q&A town hall lifestream w/ @igTedPrice at 1pm PDT / 4pm EDT on @TwitchTV http://www.twitch.tv/insomniacgames
And yet Resistance 3 is the only game in the series worth playing and IMO their best game by far.
After the developments of today, Insomniac's reasoning makes little sense now.
Internet is no longer required...
What exactly makes it good, specifically campaign and multiplayer competitive. What makes it better than the first game?
I have seen several people claim that it's better yet I don't believe I've ever seen someone elaborate.
Should be interesting.
I wonder if they are going to show gameplay footage? Maybe even a trailer...
What exactly makes it good, specifically campaign and multiplayer competitive. What makes it better than the first game?
I have seen several people claim that it's better yet I don't believe I've ever seen someone elaborate.
I got the impression they were talking about what the dedicated server support offers them, not the always online requirement. The former remains and is a big part of the One's advantages in terms of how many Microsoft seem to have.
What exactly makes it good, specifically campaign and multiplayer competitive. What makes it better than the first game?
I have seen several people claim that it's better yet I don't believe I've ever seen someone elaborate.
It's not . FoM is the only good game in the series.
People are going to be disappointed when the actual gameplay looks nothing like that trailer.
It's probably going to be another FPS anyway and with Titanfall already doing jetpacks and wall running, this game might be redundant other than its artstyle.
this game might be redundant other than its artstyle.
Ummm There is Absolutely nothing stopping Them from using "Cloud" servers on PS4 or even PS3 for that matter.
It was a buncha PR BS that was fed to us.
Also if you are talking about quantity, Amazon EC2 last YEAR had half a million servers spread around the world, probably more by now.
I am talking about quantity and not mystical mumbo jumbo. Dedicated servers/magic are very important things. I doubt Sony has access to nearly as many. Amazon may have half a million servers spread around the world, but how many do Sony have access to?
Microsoft have 300K just for their own personal use. Or at least this was how I took it.
Umm sony doesn't need to have any, People don't need to use their platform holder's Cloud.
And Microsoft's Cloud is not some Xbox One ONLY service. I repeat its not just for "Personal use" Anyone can start a server on Azure.
http://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/pricing/calculator/
It is used in exactly the same way as Amazon's only Amazon's is more robust
How do we know it was a 'betraylton'? Maybe Sony didn't like their new game? Nor E.A after Fuse?
How do we know it was a 'betraylton'? Maybe Sony didn't like their new game? Nor E.A after Fuse?
Dedicated Servers do a lot of good, they aren't "needed" but you can't say they aren't an advantage(for anyone using them). And I'm not sure why you keep trying to push amazon onto me. When did I say their servers were inferior or anything of the sort?
You're claiming Xbox has an advantage because of the cloud.
I'm saying Anyone on any platform can leverage the cloud.
From my understanding devs can use MS cloud servers for anything they want, it's just there to use. Why would you rent amazon servers if you can just use MS one's if you make an Xbox game?
Similarly any Dev can use any cloud service for anything they want. They are also just there to use.
As of right now the only thing we know is that there are OS level hooks to access the Cloud.
So right now they only thing we can assume is that its a little bit easier to implement.
Your claim was that Xbox has an advantage because Devs have access to MORE cloud servers. This is incorrect.
Your first two paragraphs make sense yeah, that's what I mean.
I never said anything about more servers though...
Hmmm...
Has there been an official mention that this is a FPS? Cause I'm really hoping it's third person.
-There is a full single-player story / campaign
-There's also a multiplayer component
-It's a traversal driven third-person open world action game with crazy weapons
-I actually thought the reaction was pretty positive to the game itself?
The game is third person.
Your claim was that Xbox has an advantage because Devs have access to MORE cloud servers. This is incorrect.
The game is third person.