Lefty said:After winning the SB, the offseason is just boring.
Must... not... try... and kick... football.. Charlie BrownLOS ANGELES -- Billionaire developer Edward P. Roski Jr. has made a commitment to build the kind of stadium an NFL team needs to thrive in Los Angeles. Now, he's hoping one will commit to play there.
Roski, a part owner of the Kings and Lakers who has spent years trying to lure the NFL back to this area, unveiled plans Thursday for a 75,000-seat facility in the City of Industry he said could be finished in time for the 2011 season.
Southern California has been the home of many professional football teams, from the LA Buccaneers in 1926 (a traveling team that never actually played in Los Angeles) to the XFL champion LA Xtreme in 2002. The Avengers of the Arena Football League are the last active team in LA.
"I intend to develop our stadium project that meets all of the NFL requirements, and more," Roski said at a Staples Center news conference, where stadium models and artist renditions were displayed. "Always the most important thing has been the certainty of doing this. A team is not going to commit to coming to Los Angeles without a stadium. We've taken this one point of uncertainty and made it a certainty. The stadium is a certainty and it will be built."
And, Roski added, without public money.
"Absolutely no taxpayer dollars," he said. "There's no taxpayer dollars to get."
The proposed 600-acre site, near the southern intersection of the 57 and 60 freeways about 20 miles east of Los Angeles, would be surrounded by a shopping mall, and located on a vacant property which Roski already owns. Roski said around 12 million people live within 25 miles of the site.
"We are aware of it and are monitoring all stadium-related developments in southern California," NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy said from his New York office.
Roski said the cost would be around $800 million, adding the stadium will be built into a hillside meaning far less steel will be required. And that, he said will result in a cost of about $400 million less than it might be otherwise.
Roski said the site is already zoned and an environmental impact report was approved in 2004.
"A supplemental EIR is currently in progress," he added, saying construction could begin as early as the final quarter of this year and parking requirements would be met. "We'll make it happen, just as we did here at Staples Center with the Lakers and Kings.
Roski and Philip Anschutz, the head of AEG, headed up construction of Staples Center. The Lakers, Kings, Clippers and Arena Football League's Los Angeles Avengers play their home games at the facility, which opened in October 1999. AEG is not involved in this venture.
The one obvious obstacle standing in the way is a tenant for the new stadium. Possibilities might include the New Orleans Saints, Jacksonville Jaguars, Minnesota Vikings and San Diego Chargers because of their stadium uncertainties.
Roski made it clear construction will not begin until a team agreed to move, adding he did not expect an expansion team to be involved.
The NFL has said it has no plans to expand from its present 32 teams, and it's also clear Los Angeles is not a high priority with the league at this time. But that might not stop a team with stadium uncertainties to make the move.
"No team is going to say they're going to come here until we have this," Roski said of the stadium plan. "We have not talked to any teams. Now, we will start the second phase of it. We'll start talking to the NFL and the teams. We've got this out of the way. Now, we'll concentrate on getting a team."
With a smile, the 69-year-old chairman and CEO of Majestic Realty Co., added: "If I was sitting there, I would be waiting for my call. This is the top market. The team that decides to come to Los Angeles is financially going to be one of the top teams in the league, by far."
Los Angeles, the second-largest media market in the country, has been without an NFL team since 1995, when the Raiders moved back to Oakland after playing 13 years at the Los Angeles Coliseum and the Rams moved from Anaheim to St. Louis.
Proposals have been made for numerous stadium sites in the area over the years including the Coliseum and the Rose Bowl in Pasadena as well as in Irwindale, Inglewood, Carson and Anaheim.
But, as Roski pointed out, there were always uncertainties.
Should a team decide to make the move, he said it could play the 2009-10 seasons at either the Coliseum or the Rose Bowl while the new stadium was under construction.
Slo said:The speculation around here is that the stadium iin LA s being built for the Vikes.
Since when has that ever stopped a team? *cough* Houston Oilers *cough*soulja224466 said:the rams wont be coming back to LA any time soon. their stadium lease runs through 2015 or so
captive said:Since when has that ever stopped a team? *cough* Houston Oilers *cough*
Ordered my season tickets for the Texans on Friday.
Striker said:Not missing much lately. :lol
Threads consist of:
Shockey: Stay or go? You decide!
Moss lining up in the slot
DB's from the Draft
Dan Conner is not that good (rolls eyes)
Ahmad Bradshaw becomes the next Jim Brown
I guess your not familiar with Houston Oilers leaving, Bud Adams never bought anything out, he left Houston with the bill for the remaining years on the contract as well as the bill for the renovations to the Astrodome.soulja224466 said:as cheap as our ownership is? i dont see them buying out such an expensive contract, hell they wouldnt even buy out scott linehans contract.
sorryaboutdresden said:Urlacher is considering retirement. Holy shit!
This is almost definitely a ploy for a new contract, but its huge if he follows through with it.
I can wear Laker gear to the first game and not stand out. Excellent...Slo said:The speculation around here is that the stadium iin LA s being built for the Vikes.
If it's the Vikes they can just move the Rams to the NFC North. St. Louis isn't exactly West to begin with.Drek said:The NFL has their divisions nicely aligned at this point. They aren't going to let that get all mucked up with some eastern or central team moving to LA and requiring the rest of their division to crisscross the country to fit in the two divisional games every year.
Karakand said:If it's the Vikes they can just move the Rams to the NFC North. St. Louis isn't exactly West to begin with.
Karakand said:None of the Rams' "rivalries" are anything of note worth preserving.
The NFC West is like the Bundesliga, you have a team of note (Niners) and a bunch of fodder.
woodchuck said:no one outside of the nfc west cares about nfc west "rivalries"
soulja224466 said:same could be said about any division. i dont give 2 shits about the cowboys, but their fans love the rivalries, and thats what counts.
not true. for any great rivalry, it has to have some national interest. nfc east rivalries have a ton of national interest. same with yankees/red sox, ohio state/michigan or international like celtic/rangers, barcelona/madrid, etc.
FrenchMovieTheme said:NFC east rivalries can eat a dick. the only reason anyone "cares" is because of the east coast media bias.
you care about the rivalries in your division because you play that team twice a year every year.
but come on man. the CARDS??
FrenchMovieTheme said:zep where have you been buttercup? i miss you and i want you back for good!
Guileless said:And it would be a travesty if the Vikings moved to LA.
Age does not really a rivalry make. (Aside from the type of rivalry FMT described when he said "because you play that team twice a year every year".)soulja224466 said:it may have died off a little in recent years, but the rams-9ers rivalry is still one of the oldest ones in the nfl.
Paul Dottino of ESPN Radio said he knows people from the Giants org and from other sources that Jeremy is not unhappy and does not want out. Take it for what it's worth. He claims the trade-talk of Shockey has been overblown.Guileless said:The Daily News article yesterday said the Saints offered a second round pick for Shockey. That's around the 40th pick. I would take it if I were Jerry Reese.
Karakand said:Age does not really a rivalry make. (Aside from the type of rivalry FMT described when he said "because you play that team twice a year every year".)
You're forgetting I grew up around the Rams.
soulja224466 said:outsiders may not give a shit, but our fans would be mad as hell if they broke up the nfc west. especially considering the rams and 9ers are the only two remaining teams from the old west.
Striker said:Paul Dottino of ESPN Radio said he knows people from the Giants org and from other sources that Jeremy is not unhappy and does not want out. Take it for what it's worth. He claims the trade-talk of Shockey has been overblown.
Slo said:That's kind of a contradiction, isn't it?
soulja224466 said:i didnt like it before, especially losing the saints. they were bitter rivals at the time.
Slo said::lol :lol :lol
Slo said:Yanks/Sox. Duke/UNC. Michigan/Ohio St. Rams/Saints.
I'm going to turn on ESPN classic right now to watch the old film.
soulja224466 said:yeah, im an idiot. the only rivalries that exist in sports today are yanks/sox and duke/unc. might as well quit playing the games and tune into sportscenter instead.
Guileless said:I'm trying to imagine what the Jet fans at the draft will do if Ryan and McFadden are available and they draft some defensive guy.