Ascend
Member
He's far from an AMD fanboy. He was slamming Navi for weeks. But good to see you don't have any actual argument, like always. Only repetition of the same baseless drivel.LMAO thanks for the laugh. That guy doesn't know what the hell he's talking about. The things AMD fans delude themselves with
Really? If you were really doing that, you would actually notice how much of a leap Navi really is. Where you saying this when AMD had async compute from their HD7000 series cards and nVidia didn't have an inferior version up until Pascal?but as an enthusiast who follows technology and already has a card that shits on anything AMD has... then yes.. I tend to look at it from a technological point of view.
Or the green glasses point of view.I tend to look at it from a technological point of view.
Based on what? Where is the other card released performing close to a 1080 Ti for $400?AMD is late to the party.
Barely? Again, based on what? Look at the chip size. Even accounting for the node shrink, their chip size is smaller compared to nVidia. Additionally, their IPC has been proven to be similar (if not slightly superior) to Turing based on testing by Computerbase.de. You know, the technological point of view you claim to look at? And looking at the market, it's no contest. There are no better value cards than the 5700 and the 5700 XT at any price above $300.They have the superior process technology. They're coming almost a year later... and they are just barely competitive...
Based on what? What refrains AMD from stepping to 7nm+(+) or even 5nm before nVidia releases their 7nm?Sorry... but that's embarrassing. AMD is going to get embarrassed when Nvidia decides to release their 7nm GPU, regardless of whether it's 7nm Turing, or Ampere.
Based on your previous replies to multiple users and multiple posts,That's just an honest point of view from someone that wishes AMD would actually compete with Nvidia.... when it really matters... not a year+ later.
a) we all know you're not honest
b) you don't actually wish AMD would compete with nVidia, because you wouldn't be slamming them when they are actually competing and using excuses like a smaller node to keep slamming AMD
c) you use vague shit like "late" and "when it really matters", even though right now since nVidia is jacking up prices through the roof, is EXACTLY when it matters the most.
You say they aren't competitive, and then you say they are a year late (implying they ARE competitive a year later). Which is it? Are they not competitive, or are they competitive "a year later"? You can't have it both ways.
Last edited: