No Mans Lie is a completely different situation compared to Cyberpunk. With No Mans Lie, Sean completely lied about what the game was, and with the money he "stole" from his costumers, he actually built the game and the features that, according to Sean, should have already been in the game. In another words, people who bought No Mans Lie kickstarted the game, only to receive what was promised almost 3 years later.
In Cyberpunk case, everything CD Projekt Red promised about the game was already in the game, it was/is just buried under a shitton of bugs and performance issues.
People have a really bad memory if some are comparing No Mans Lie situation to this one, Already forgetting the shit Sean and Hello games pulled with No Mans Lie, just because they mamaged to actually develop the game they promised after "borrowing" people's money with a shell of a game.
And you know what the funny thing about all this will be?Is that the same people complaining about Cyberpunk will also forget about this whole debacle once CD Red finishes fixing the game and releasing the expansions(which, contrary to what some are saying in here, I feel like some of those expansions will be released for free to get some goodwill, much like No Mans Lie did).
The only difference between Cyberpunk and No Mams Lie is that Cyberpunk's failures are still fresh in people's mind, and No Mans Lie is already old news by now.