this is nothing that should surprise anyone. valve is an independent developer with a sum total of 250 employees working in a weird commie set up where they aren't fired for saying hi to their boss. ea is an all-consuming 10,000 strong leviathan whose association with gaming is purely fiscal; they are essentially the middle men through which investors extract short term personal economic gain from an industry where the commodity happens to be video games.bloodydrake said:EA has done nothing to show they can compete this way. Their commitment is to maximize profits to their shareholders...often at the consumers expense. They've shown they will disable older versions of their games so they can force people to buy incremental yearly iterations of their games. Their purpose is to benifit themselves..not to benefit themselves and the community.
szaromir said:I'd prefer if Steam was an optional client, like GOG or something. Right now it feels more like a tool to squeeze more money out of my CC than something I really need.
What do you think Origin will become? EA wants Origin to become exactly like Steam. If EA could, they would have launched it with everything up instead of some pathetic 3 year plan chart to catch up to the competition >_>szaromir said:I'd prefer if Steam was an optional client, like GOG or something. Right now it feels more like a tool to squeeze more money out of my CC than something I really need.
Honestly? The majority of them will be saddened. They ultimately just want people to play their games.Salacious Crumb said:I wonder how Crytek and DICE feel about this crap.
ghst said:this is nothing that should surprise anyone. valve is an independent developer with a sum total of 250 employees working in a weird commie set up where they aren't fired for saying hi to their boss. ea is an all-consuming 10,000 strong leviathan whose association with gaming is purely fiscal; they are essentially the middle men through which investors extract short term personal economic gain from an industry where the commodity happens to be video games.
the market has time and again spoken on the worth of steam, it's a true hero of rose-tinted post war capitalism. the little guy who conquered the world, yet never lost sight of how they got there. anyone can figure the relationship between the growth of pc gaming and its stalwart marketplace leadership by an independent developer who has time and again had pro-consumer practice at the top of their MO.
but this is big business, it was always a matter of time before a joyless warchest wielding empire attempted to rip the carpet out from underneath what valve have built. ea knows their user-base would rather buy from steam, therefore rather than developing a competitive alternative, they will simply forbid it; there is nothing competitive about this move in a pro-consumer sense. if valve is a fairytale hero of capitalism, ea is the cold reality, leveraging their weight to appease shareholders in a myopic move that is both against the will of their userbase and ultimately damaging to the industry they trade in.
ghst said:this is nothing that should surprise anyone. valve is an independent developer with a sum total of 250 employees working in a weird commie set up where they aren't fired for saying hi to their boss. ea is an all-consuming 10,000 strong leviathan whose association with gaming is purely fiscal; they are essentially the middle men through which investors extract short term personal economic gain from an industry where the commodity happens to be video games.
the market has time and again spoken on the worth of steam, it's a true hero of rose-tinted post war capitalism. the little guy who conquered the world, yet never lost sight of how they got there. anyone can figure the relationship between the growth of pc gaming and its stalwart marketplace leadership by an independent developer who has time and again had pro-consumer practice at the top of their MO.
but this is big business, it was always a matter of time before a joyless warchest wielding empire attempted to rip the carpet out from underneath what valve have built. ea knows their user-base would rather buy from steam, therefore rather than developing a competitive alternative, they will simply forbid it; there is nothing competitive about this move in a pro-consumer sense. if valve is a fairytale hero of capitalism, ea is the cold reality, leveraging their weight to appease shareholders in a myopic move that is both against the will of their userbase and ultimately damaging to the industry they trade in.
Zizbuka said:"Steam's very successful, we need to copy that"
szaromir said:LOL that depends. I had a Steam ranking '10' at some point in May. I probably should stop posting here for now and enjoy the afternoon though.
I'd prefer if Steam was an optional client, like GOG or something. Right now it feels more like a tool to squeeze more money out of my CC than something I really need.
So far. They might very well open it up.bloodydrake said:But they're not copying that.. Origin is EA exclusive, Steam is pretty much an open platform.
Dunlop said:The boner for steam continues.
Publisher pulls game for it's own DD system - sucks, mild outrage to be expected
on Gaf 28 page thread and counting
and BF3 I'll not be happyciaossu said:Oh no... if Mass Effect 3 isn't on Steam
I'll be D:
VisanidethDM said:If they really plan to fight Valve, they'll need to do something better than that.
Valve has a lot of credibility among gamers; if I was EA, or Activision, I would simply capture the chance to sell my games on my own at a couple dollars more than what Valve was giving me.
I would make my offer the most attractive, and at the same time "expose" Valve's "greed" and lead consumers to equate them to Sony or MS.
Jade Ryan said:Wow... this post is the saddest and most pathetic thing I've seen in quite some time. Bravo gentlemen, bravo.
Jade Ryan said:Wow... this thread is the saddest and most pathetic thing I've seen in quite some time. Bravo gentlemen, bravo.
ROBOKITTYZILLA said:Fixed.
Except Steam has a console-level fanbase, in terms of size. The outrage that's expected is therefore on par with a multi game getting exclusive to a competing console. Think Bioshock. We aren't even close to that level, though, from what I remember.Dunlop said:The boner for steam continues.
Publisher pulls game for it's own DD system - sucks, mild outrage to be expected
on Gaf 28 page thread and counting
iNvidious01 said:you guys are forgetting good old retail games, usually £5 cheaper than steam at launch and now with EA's RRP pricing retail will be £10-£15 cheaper than origin.
Burekma said:Except Steam has a console-level fanbase, in terms of zealotry.
i like youghst said:this is nothing that should surprise anyone. valve is an independent developer with a sum total of 250 employees working in a weird commie set up where they aren't fired for saying hi to their boss. ea is an all-consuming 10,000 strong leviathan whose association with gaming is purely fiscal; they are essentially the middle men through which investors extract short term personal economic gain from an industry where the commodity happens to be video games.
the market has time and again spoken on the worth of steam, it's a true hero of rose-tinted post war capitalism. the little guy who conquered the world, yet never lost sight of how they got there. anyone can figure the relationship between the growth of pc gaming and its stalwart marketplace leadership by an independent developer who has time and again had pro-consumer practice at the top of their MO.
but this is big business, it was always a matter of time before a joyless warchest wielding empire attempted to rip the carpet out from underneath what valve have built. ea knows their user-base would rather buy from steam, therefore rather than developing a competitive alternative, they will simply forbid it; there is nothing competitive about this move in a pro-consumer sense. if valve is a fairytale hero of capitalism, ea is the cold reality, leveraging their weight to appease shareholders in a myopic move that is both against the will of their userbase and ultimately damaging to the industry they trade in.
I don't have full games on Origin to check, but in the settings there's an option to "Keep game installers after games have been installed." Did you have that checked when you tried to back them up?coopolon said:This isn't really accurate anymore. You have to have the client running to download and install games and you cannot back those games up.
Complistic said:If steam takes 30% of sales, how much do stores like Gamestop take? If anyone knows.
Dunlop said:The boner for steam continues.
Publisher pulls game for it's own DD system - sucks, mild outrage to be expected
on Gaf 28 page thread and counting
e_i said:Does this mean no more updates for Crysis 2 on Steam?
Yes. And I tried changing the folder to make sure I knew where the installers were being saved. After not being able tuo figure it out I did a search and found a thread on the ea forums where a few ea employees state that because they changed the install process to automatically install the game after installing you can no longer back up the game. I am on my phone so can't link right now but will later if necessary.faceless007 said:I don't have full games on Origin to check, but in the settings there's an option to "Keep game installers after games have been installed." Did you have that checked when you tried to back them up?
source?tacotime77 said:Gabe Newell is not pleased at all...
As you said, it depends entirely on where you live. For me, Steam is usually almost twice as expensive as buying a retail copy and that's just too large a difference for me to even consider buying from Steam, no matter how many bonus games that I will never play that you throw in.jaundicejuice said:The bolded depends entirely upon where you live. Steam is actually cheaper with new releases at launch, usually offering a 10% discount for pre-orders along with including an older release or two for said pre-order.
Enkidu said:As you said, it depends entirely on where you live. For me, Steam is usually almost twice as expensive as buying a retail copy and that's just too large a difference for me to even consider buying from Steam, no matter how many bonus games that I will never play that you throw in.
Littlegator said:And this probably applies to less than 1% of the market. It's really not even worth including in the discussion.
For most people, Steam is considerably cheaper, especially when waiting.
If Valve did anything like use one of their most popular games as a trojan horse for a DD service the Steam fans would uprise.Dabanton said:Can't blame EA as cunty as this decision is they know they have the games that you guys want to play.
Why not use one of their biggest potential sellers as the hook to get you in.
What you did there. I saw it.water_wendi said:If Valve did anything like use one of their most popular games as a trojan horse for a DD service the Steam fans would uprise.
jaundicejuice said:No, I think Steam isn't all that great a service in Asia, Europe and Australia based off of posts about content restrictions or pricing in the OT for Steam. If you're a North American, generally it's a pretty great service all around, when you look further abroad, that's less and less true.
Warrior_Keoni said:I apologize in advance if this has not been linked before:
So...I only own the game for a year?