The map is also real but only for me and a few other players
Bullshit meter is going off.I also steal/copy the Role of whoever the last person is who voted against me
Fine, my dear Watson's, I can't role claim, happy?
I'm already skirting the line with this post.
I, too, think TB is scum
*puts a tick by point 4*
Also, to be clear, my previous comment was complete sarcasm. I still don't think that the map matters at all.
I'd kinda want someone to corroborate the map being an actual element if they could, but it'd probably hint at a power role, so I guess they shouldn't.
I said no map mechanics, nothing about there being no maps.
No, the map doesn't matter
Sketch is being extremely quick to believe things.Basically, blarg can only post properly for an hour a day. Otherwise he's 'AFK'
Am I getting it?
Good point.Sketch is being extremely quick to believe things.
That might not be hugely out of character, but come on:
1) This is way too disruptive to someone's posting to be a real in-game mechanic
Blarg has been intentionally given a role before, one that just so happened to have a penalty similar to the FA mechanism: see Final Fantasy, where due to his role as Bartz he had to basically role play the entire game as his win condition and absolutely no one caught it.2) It just so happens to go to Blarg, the one player most likely to do this for shits and giggles
3) He uses his one hour in the dead of night when only a few people are posting.
I think a little scepticism would be prudent.
Huh? Are you saying Scrafty intentionally gave Blarg that neutral role instead of RNGing it? Because that's a very serious accusation that I would never ever makeBlarg has been intentionally given a role before, one that just so happened to have a penalty similar to the FA mechanism: see Final Fantasy, where due to his role as Bartz he had to basically role play the entire game as his win condition and absolutely no one caught it.
Rereading your post, I guess this is trueAlso what makes you think I 100% believe what's going on? I'm basically just trying to piece things together right now. Nowhere in that post did I say I believed that is definitely Blarg's role setup. I'm basically flinging shit to see what sticks.
♪ BELIEVE it or not, Blarg is not in his room, pls
Leave a message, (don't) PM me
But if you have died, thanks for calling it off
I'm so sorry~
BELIEVE it or not, wasn't me ♫
1) Isn't you saying "I'm looking at who unvotes" going to influence whether or not people unvote?The whole point of the gambit was probably to be a pain in the ass and a easy target, easy enough that mafia might hop on board.
It'll be interesting to see who unvotes now.
Why_not_both?Ty4on, I'm debating if I appreciate the effort but it's clear this is a waste of time. Yes Splinter, watch me stifle conversation.
There was a man it was said
Had to rhyme or be dead
He voted too quick
It made him feel sick
I don't think anything he posted cleared much of anything up though. If it is a gambit it reminds me of yours in quarantine in that all it did is bring a ton of suspicion upon him that won't be cleared easily. The only thing to come from it is that we can possibly find out two alignments in one lynch but even that is dependent on Blarg being honest which isn't exactly a given with what he has posted so far.The whole point of the gambit was probably to be a pain in the ass and a easy target, easy enough that mafia might hop on board.
It'll be interesting to see who unvotes now.
I feel like you are sort of glossing over exactly HOW Blarg got himself killed in SW. He decided to gambit, claimed scum, and then hoped that would be enough to not get him killed. Mind you, he did that as the role-cop for town. He didn't die for his early inane posting, he died because he claimed scum.Gets a pass often? I feel like he's always getting lynched early. I played with him in SW and PiR and he died D2 and D1.
Maybe be at your room at a time other than 6-7am?better hurry it up, my allotted 1 hour of normal posting a Day is already more than halfway over
Talk to me, people
I thought that was obvious. If he wanted to communicate he wouldn't have quoted random posts inbetween.Blarg replied with two pregame quotes and then a Bronx-Man quote. Royal didn't clarify if he should quote it *immediately* afterwards.
The connection between Terra and Blarg at this point is almost non-existing at all imo. I've seen Scum being concerned or "concerned" about an early D1 turbo regardless of what alignment the other party had. Speaking of which, are there examples of Townies being actually concerned about a not-so-imminent turbo on D1? I'm almost certain there are, but I can't think of any concrete examples.FTR, if I were scumhunting I'd vote Terra. First for his feigned concern over a turbo that isn't going to happen and second for his shoddy defenses since being called out.
I don't like Sorian's idea of lynching Blarg first. The scummy action here was Terra's, so he's the one we should be lynching. I know that last time Terra did this it was for a teammate, but as I said I think his concern is fake - a mistake he could make regardless of whether or not the turbo target is a teammate. If Blarg happens to be town then lynching him first would clear a lot of the suspicion on Terra with faulty logic.
However, Blarg has been Blarging too hard for my tastes so I'm still on board with the policy lynch for now.
I don't thing anybody actually said Terra defended Blarg. Like in "arguing that he's Town or shouldn't be lynched today". Just that he was "suspiciously" concerned about the vote pile.also this "terras defense of blarg" seems to be a fantasy brought on by peoples misdirected annoyance.
but then maybe im just thinking that because i have a similar point to him.