Blizzard is on the record quite recently stating HotS is on pace to come out "mid-2012." Weeee'll seeeee....MrKnives said:Heh, yeah right
Blizzard is on the record quite recently stating HotS is on pace to come out "mid-2012." Weeee'll seeeee....MrKnives said:Heh, yeah right
Kosma said:Diablo could release on Jesus' birthday and shops would open.
Canova said:lol
but again as I said Diablo is not the 800-pounds gorilla it used to be. that 10-12 years break is just too long to keep the momentum
But Blizzard, their properties and fandom has exploded exponentially over the past decade. Momentum is irrelevant in their case.Canova said:but again as I said Diablo is not the 800-pounds gorilla it used to be. that 10-12 years break is just too long to keep the momentum
Corky said:I recall making a bet in a recent d3 thread, a couple of weeks/month or so ago, that if the game came 2011 I'd post a picture of my hairy ass.
In a way, I guess I'm to blame for the delay.
Canova said:it will, but that's not exactly what the other guy said. he said Blizzard could put it anytime they want, and it would still sell gazillion. and I argued, it wouldn't. Let see if they dared to put it against MW3 or bF3
This.Derrick01 said:That didn't seem to bother Starcraft 2.
Absolutely; Guild Wars 2, TERA, Kingdoms of Amalur, Risen 2, all of them are going to avoid launching anywhere near when Diablo III is slated.Zeliard said:Bethesda doesn't seem too scared of releasing Skyrim literally three days after MW3 comes out, you think Blizzard would be with a game like Diablo 3? Other companies are more likely to modify their release schedules around whatever Blizzard is doing.
I don't think they even care when those games ship. Blizzard could easily ship anything when they want and it would sell good.Canova said:Let see if they dared to put it against MW3 or bF3
Until they consider making D3 a FPS.rakhir said:I don't think they even care when those games ship. Blizzard could easily ship anything when they want and it would sell good.
And there's not that much of a share of players between d3 and those shooters, anyway.
That's a great idea, let's discuss it write an article around that concept!DMPrince said:Until they consider making D3 a FPS.
Pein said:Good, gives me some time to beef up my rig.
Canova said:it will, but that's not exactly what the other guy said. he said Blizzard could put it anytime they want, and it would still sell gazillion. and I argued, it wouldn't. Let see if they dared to put it against MW3 or bF3
Canova said:lol
but again as I said Diablo is not the 800-pounds gorilla it used to be. that 10-12 years break is just too long to keep the momentum
When is it gonna be out anyway?witchedwiz said:guess i'll have time to play torchlight 2 before diablo3!
nothing lost!
sometimes in 2011 lol. last i heard was from the PR for price in august.Yoshichan said:When is it gonna be out anyway?
Yoshichan said:When is it gonna be out anyway?
Canova said:lol
but again as I said Diablo is not the 800-pounds gorilla it used to be. that 10-12 years break is just too long to keep the momentum
Khezu said:Id say its bigger, 10 years of massively positive word of mouth, and all the wow players.
40 Year old woman will buy diablo 3 to play it with that wow guild mates, all blizzard has to do is release it in one of wows many luls, and the shared friend's list will do the rest.
The change in art style though is clearly a grab at trying to entice casual WoW players to try this newfangled Diablo thing.Corky said:I have no doubt in d3 potential success, but the above is one helluva delusion if I ever saw one.
D3 is not WoW.
DaBuddaDa said:The change in art style though is clearly a grab at trying to entice casual WoW players to try this newfangled Diablo thing.
And the WoW art team was put on Diablo III for that reason. Diablo 1/2's style is too dark, too gross, not quite mass-market enough for what Blizzard wants for this game. There were stories a long time ago of D3 playtesters who overwhelmingly complained that the game was too gritty and dark and depressing and needed to be more whimsical and colorful.Corky said:Or that could simply be explained by the fact that the artteam behind behind d3 and WoW are the same whereas the guys from d1 and d2 are long gone (?).
Zeliard said:Bethesda doesn't seem too scared of releasing Skyrim literally three days after MW3 comes out, you think Blizzard would be with a game like Diablo 3?
Diablo 2 art is a call of females. I know from experience, chicks dig D2.DaBuddaDa said:And the WoW art team was put on Diablo III for that reason. Diablo 1/2's style is too dark, too gross, not quite mass-market enough for what Blizzard wants for this game. There were stories a long time ago of D3 playtesters who overwhelmingly complained that the game was too gritty and dark and depressing and needed to be more whimsical and colorful.
DaBuddaDa said:And the WoW art team was put on Diablo III for that reason.
Diablo 1/2's style is too dark, too gross, not quite mass-market enough for what Blizzard wants for this game.
There were stories a long time ago of D3 playtesters who overwhelmingly complained that the game was too gritty and dark and depressing and needed to be more whimsical and colorful.
Yoshichan said:When is it gonna be out anyway?
TheExodu5 said:July 2011