Support NeoGAF

[phaelf2]

i would go for bronze match at 21:00 and once it done do the final. it should all be wrapped up in 1 hour.

 

[ViviOggi]

I'm fine with either

 

[Iryx]

Both options are OK with me.

 

[Rapstah]

Cool, that sounds like a plan.

 

[phaelf2]

gg

Priest vs Druid Loss
Mage vs Shaman Loss
Mage vs Warlock Loss
Hunter vs Druid Win

 

[Kotetsu534]

GG. Confirming phaelf's result above.

 

[Iryx]

Congrats to Oggi for winning 3-1, thankfully turn 2 topdeck Wild Growth saved me from getting blown out.

 

[Kotetsu534]

Congrats to ViviOggi. That Pally/Warlock match was pretty intense stuff.

Fun tournament! Thanks for hosting, Rapstah.

 

[Rapstah]

Thanks for hosting, Rapstah.

Thanks!

Does anyone have any feedback on the organisation or the format? Was conquest with three classes (and the same classes for the entire tournament) optimal? Was one week too long between matches? Was single elimination better than double elimination?

 

[ViviOggi]

Thanks guys and thanks to Rapstah for the organization and emergency production, it was a lot of fun. We shouldn't wait too long with the next one!

I liked the freedom re: scheduling and keeping classes but not decks for the entire tournament. Allows you to tech but also gives the class selection weight. Goddamn Blizzard and their region locking though, would be so nice to have one global tournament.

 

[Iryx]

Thanks!

Does anyone have any feedback on the organisation or the format? Was conquest with three classes (and the same classes for the entire tournament) optimal? Was one week too long between matches? Was single elimination better than double elimination?

I felt like having three locked classes, but being able to change up your deck was a good way of doing it. One week was alright. I think single elimination is fine with so few players, but I played trough the entire thing, if I had lost on week one I probably would've wanted double elimination.