I believe it was originally pitched to HBO and they passed on it.Wtf @ that AMC stuff.
A shame it didn't end up on HBO though. Almost everything is better on HBO.
Wtf @ that AMC stuff.
A shame it didn't end up on HBO though. Almost everything is better on HBO.
Oh damn. So HBO fucked up too.I believe it was originally pitched to HBO and they passed on it.
Lmao. Fair, though I bet True Blood on HBO is at least better than True Blood on like FX or something.I'm currently watching True Blood. I don't see how HBO made that show better.
In 2001, Matthew Weiner writes his first Mad Men script, which goes nowhere until 2005, when AMC decides to shop for its first original scripted series.
Matthew Weiner (creator) I finished the script and sent it to my agents. They didn't read it for three or four months. (They're not my agents anymore.) I was advised not to send it anywhere because that was at a time when there were big overall deals for comedy writers. People would pay for the anticipation of what your project would be, and actually having one was going to hurt you. I kept trying to get into HBO, but I never got a meeting. And I met with FX, which Kevin Reilly was running at that time. He talked to me about making it into a half‑hour. Then people started talking to me about a feature. It was my manager's assistant who gave AMC the script. That's who they were pawned off on.
I believe it was originally pitched to HBO and they passed on it.
I'm currently watching True Blood. I don't see how HBO made that show better.
I stand corrected, I was under the impression that they met and passed on it.HBO wouldn't take a meeting with Weiner which isn't a huge surprise given their track record. They're not usually interested in going into business on any project that doesn't have a big name (writer, director, actor) attached. I understand lionizing them for their good reputation and multiple great projects over the years, but their complete lack of interest in anything without star talent means that projects like this sometimes fall through the cracks.
EDIT: From the THR article:
I'm not sure 100% clear on the timing and mechanics on all of this, but here's a 2008 article from the NYT:I stand corrected, I was under the impression that they met and passed on it.
After graduating from film school, Weiner wrote scripts for three years, and the only money he earned was from appearing on Jeopardy! His wife encouraged him to make an independent film, which he shot in 12 days and edited while working in production at A&E Biography. The movie ultimately disappeared, but right before he screened it, a friend called to ask him for some jokes, which got him hired on the sitcom Party Girl. The series was picked up and quickly canceled, and he wrote for two more short-lived sitcoms before landing on Becker. I worked there for three years, Weiner recalled, but about a year into it I said, You know what, this is not what I want to do when I grow up. Which is when he wrote the Mad Men pilot.
In true Hollywood fashion, it took seven more years for him to become an overnight sensation. But he feels like the outsider hes always been. The beauty of my story, he said, is that I never sold a pitch. Im not clear enough in my ideas, even though Im a good talker. I think at this point people trust me because I have a track record, but all of my stuff was like: You dont think I can make a movie? Here, I made a movie. You dont think I can write this pilot? I pitched the story of Mad Men to a couple of people, and they said, There is too much smoking, or Don is too unlikable. And Im like, I write on The Sopranos, and Im watching the most on-paper unlikable person in the world. Well, guess what? Jim Gandolfini played that person, and it made a huge difference. So I wrote it.
Which made the cut even deeper when HBO said no. (Or more to the point, Weiner says, never even got back to him.) Weiner has remained politely reticent about his treatment there. All I can tell you is that it was very disappointing to me, as I pushed the rock up the hill, that they did not notice me, he said. Because I was part of the family.
No one at HBO was willing to speak on the record about why the network passed on Mad Men. Off the record, I heard plenty about the insularity of the previous regime, flush as it was with the success of The Sopranos, Sex and the City and Six Feet Under. One employee summed up Weiners situation this way: David Chase says the guys incredible, hes writing shows for your iconic hit and you dont shoot the pilot? Line up 10 people in show business and ask if that makes sense.
Richard Plepler, co-president of HBO, who took over programming along with Michael Lombardo in June 2007, told me, Mad Men is a magnificent show, and the only problem with it is its not on HBO.
The idea that they wouldn't meet with one of the writers of The Sopranos seems baffling, especially considering that it seems like HBO bought super-sized green lights for everything related to Terry Winter's Boardwalk Empire.I'm not sure 100% clear on the timing and mechanics on all of this, but here's a 2008 article from the NYT:
AMC went through this weird phase a few years ago where they were treating everyone like shit. I've read the same with other shows. I think they're ok now...I hope.
My guess would be that at that point, they'd already been burned by Mad Men going to AMC and didn't want to make the same mistake twice. Also, Scorsese was attached to Boardwalk Empire, and presumably that made HBO's eyes light up.The idea that they wouldn't meet with one of the writers of The Sopranos seems baffling, especially considering that it seems like HBO bought super-sized green lights for everything related to Terry Winter's Boardwalk Empire.
My guess would be that at that point, they'd already been burned by Mad Men going to AMC and didn't want to make the same mistake twice. Also, Scorsese was attached to Boardwalk Empire, and presumably that made HBO's eyes light up.
My guess would be that at that point, they'd already been burned by Mad Men going to AMC and didn't want to make the same mistake twice. Also, Scorsese was attached to Boardwalk Empire, and presumably that made HBO's eyes light up.
So, you've watched them all. Season 7 was split, 7 episodes last year and 7 this spring.
Not sure if there's an exact date yet, but I'm pretty sure the new seasons are set to appear on Netflix a couple weeks prior to the new season airing.sorry meant episode 4
The first half of S7 will be up March 22nd on Netflix.
Wtf @ that AMC stuff.
A shame it didn't end up on HBO though. Almost everything is better on HBO.
*thinks of sexposition in Game of Thrones*
No. I'm damn glad it didn't end up on HBO in hindsight because they would've had to write naked women into every single episode probably. I've got nothing against nudity but its inclusion to meet some kind of quota is just sad.
Isn't the sex from the books?
They wouldn't forced Weiner to include sex scenes for the sake of sex scenes.
Can't argue with thatPeggy looks classier and classier with each new season, while the men look more and more ridiculous.
Isn't the sex from the books?
They wouldn't forced Weiner to include sex scenes for the sake of sex scenes.
*thinks of sexposition in Game of Thrones*
No. I'm damn glad it didn't end up on HBO in hindsight because they would've had to write naked women into every single episode probably. I've got nothing against nudity but its inclusion to meet some kind of quota is just sad.
They wouldn't forced Weiner to include sex scenes for the sake of sex scenes.
That's more of a game of thrones problem than anything else, I never noticed it in prior series
Eh, HBO shows aren't really like that in general. Game of Thrones is just crazy :lol it's not really too far off the books tbh*thinks of sexposition in Game of Thrones*
No. I'm damn glad it didn't end up on HBO in hindsight because they would've had to write naked women into every single episode probably. I've got nothing against nudity but its inclusion to meet some kind of quota is just sad.
Maybe not, but since Mad Men is already a very sexy show, and characters do have sex fairly often, HBO probably would have pushed for them to be more explicit and to include more nudity.
not available in my country, fuck you youtube.- Jon Hamm talks about Don Draper (one more part of the roundtable series, youtube)
Considering the women on this show, I wouldn't complain about more nudity.
Jessica Pare, Elisabeth Moss, and January Jones have already appeared topless on television and in film.Would we have these same women though, if their roles required nudity? :O
Eh, HBO shows aren't really like that in general. Game of Thrones is just crazy :lol it's not really too far off the books tbh
I've read the books and this comparison doesn't hold water. It's not like Martin spends time describing how naked everyone is. If people are naked or there is sex, it's functional or it just *is*. It's not lurid in the same way as the show, and it's an apples to oranges comparison anyway.
Oh the show definitely revels in that shit for sure, but I dunno. Don't remember the books being that different (and it's never bothered me either way). But it's been a while since I've read them.I've read the books and this comparison doesn't hold water. It's not like Martin spends time describing how naked everyone is. If people are naked or there is sex, it's functional or it just *is*. It's not lurid in the same way as the show, and it's an apples to oranges comparison anyway.
Jessica Pare, Elisabeth Moss, and January Jones have already appeared topless on television and in film.