-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales : Screenshot PS5
- Thread starter Evilms
- Start date
IbelieveInGenerations
Banned
You know what looks nextgen?
Horizon Zero Dawn PC version. Even more nextgen than Forbidden West.
Gamernyc78
Banned
We got another one
 FUD patrol on deck with delusions of grandeur here spreading propaganda. You won't last long lol
Last edited:
VFXVeteran
Banned
No. Current gen for sure (ignore the cinematics when judging graphics). All the games have looked current gen except HB2, UE5 demo and FS2020.
VFXVeteran
Banned
If FW looks similar to HZD (which it does, I gave screens to prove it) and you guys think HFW is next-gen, then your statement is absolutely true.
sainraja
Member
I have been playing through the DLC content as well. The game is really good.
IbelieveInGenerations
Banned
I am being sacarstic lmao
It looks similar in the sense of running on the same Engine.
But FW has much better modeling, geometry, lod, lighting, vegetation, much more big and complex in design, with a wolrd to explore under the water, possibly being able to fly and explore the air also.
Last edited:
Mister Wolf
Member
Ratchet isn't coming out this year and doesnt even have a release date.
Allnamestakenlol
Member
Image quality looks very soft. Low res, post processing or wut?
Mr Moose
Gold Member
Might be the chromatic aberration. I think you can turn that shit off in the PS4 game, hopefully will be able to in this too.
itsjustJEFF
Member
I love how the reaction to the OP is... "Show us gameplay" "Looks like a CG shot!" "That's not gameplay" Spider-Man looked really good, Spider-Man MM looks like a good "evolution" of that game visually.
I guess that screen shot is too good to believe?!?!
But then people are like "Horizon Zero Dawn 2 is the best looking game" or "HellBlade 2 is the best looking next gen game around right now" "OH SHIT (insert CGI trailer that was shown) is looking amazing!" "Oh shit (Insert CGI trailer that was shown) So fucking hyped!" Excuse me?!?! I can't figure out if people are just trolling or they're being truthful? Not sure if fanboy or not?
I guess maybe since Spider-Man is coming up in 3 months it deserves the scrutiny? But a game that is 1-2 years away is able to get away with it, is that it?
I guess that screen shot is too good to believe?!?!
But then people are like "Horizon Zero Dawn 2 is the best looking game" or "HellBlade 2 is the best looking next gen game around right now" "OH SHIT (insert CGI trailer that was shown) is looking amazing!" "Oh shit (Insert CGI trailer that was shown) So fucking hyped!" Excuse me?!?! I can't figure out if people are just trolling or they're being truthful? Not sure if fanboy or not?I guess maybe since Spider-Man is coming up in 3 months it deserves the scrutiny? But a game that is 1-2 years away is able to get away with it, is that it?
Last edited:
KingdomHeartsFan
Member
To be fair white spiderman got a huge white spider on the front of his suit.
BlueXImpulse
Banned
Xbox fans are really upset about this. It's craizy.
vaibhavpisal
Member
Super excited to jump on next gen in all its 4k glory.
VulcanRaven
Gold Member
I don't think people would have been happy if Uncharted: The Lost Legacy had been exclusive launch title for a new console. I haven't played it but it was a small spin-off game.
Last edited:
GymWolf
Gold Member
You can bet your ass on it.
GHG
Member
This guy had been dormant or sporadically posting for years and then suddenly as soon as Halo Infinite gets delayed he goes into overdrive troll mode.
Did they activate you, sleeper agent?
Jaguar Victory
Member
The screens look really great. RayTracing confirmed bodes well for us next gen on console 
replicant-
Member
MayauMiao
Member
More importantly, ray tracing puddles!
Elog
Member
I am really surprised by the amount of misunderstanding that surrounds variable clocks with a fixed power budget. My take is that people do not fully understand what in-frame bottlecks are in graphics and how they effect the overall performance of your GPU.
The best analogy that I have created is a road with cars. And please understand that it is far from perfect and I am sure someone else can come up with a better analogy than this
Going back to the road with cars: The width of the road and its speed limit is the number of CUs and the frequency respectively.
When every car has exactly the same speed you can pack the road with cars that go bumper to bumper. You are now performing at your maximum theoretical Tflops number.
Just like a road however this is a very unlikely scenario. Cars move at slightly different speeds which creates an actual throughput, or Tflops, that is lower than the theoretical max.
Now one car breaks for a few seconds. This does not only slow down that car down but actually cause downstream problems that take some time to untangle. So the problem is not just in that moment but it lingers afterwards.
This is the in-frame bottleneck problem.
If you can increase the speed of that car in that moment before it causes any ripple effects it results in a higher throughput of the road. And actually, if you were to lower the speed of all other cars for a few moments and then speed up again together with the car that performed the break, you also have a higher throughput through the entire encounter.
So the ability to modulate the speed of each car - both up and down - helps you reach an actual throughput that is much closer to your theoretical max than having fixed speeds.
Or in other words: If a road has a max speed of 120 mph, you are better off telling each car to drive 100 mph as long as you can modulate cars individually to both go slower and faster (up to 120mph) - that gives you the maximum amount of cars to your destination over time (actual Tflops). That is what Cerny is trying to do. Will he succeed? Time will tell - but variable clocks to get the flow synchronised is better than fixed for maximum actual Tflops.
The best analogy that I have created is a road with cars. And please understand that it is far from perfect and I am sure someone else can come up with a better analogy than this
Going back to the road with cars: The width of the road and its speed limit is the number of CUs and the frequency respectively.
When every car has exactly the same speed you can pack the road with cars that go bumper to bumper. You are now performing at your maximum theoretical Tflops number.
Just like a road however this is a very unlikely scenario. Cars move at slightly different speeds which creates an actual throughput, or Tflops, that is lower than the theoretical max.
Now one car breaks for a few seconds. This does not only slow down that car down but actually cause downstream problems that take some time to untangle. So the problem is not just in that moment but it lingers afterwards.
This is the in-frame bottleneck problem.
If you can increase the speed of that car in that moment before it causes any ripple effects it results in a higher throughput of the road. And actually, if you were to lower the speed of all other cars for a few moments and then speed up again together with the car that performed the break, you also have a higher throughput through the entire encounter.
So the ability to modulate the speed of each car - both up and down - helps you reach an actual throughput that is much closer to your theoretical max than having fixed speeds.
Or in other words: If a road has a max speed of 120 mph, you are better off telling each car to drive 100 mph as long as you can modulate cars individually to both go slower and faster (up to 120mph) - that gives you the maximum amount of cars to your destination over time (actual Tflops). That is what Cerny is trying to do. Will he succeed? Time will tell - but variable clocks to get the flow synchronised is better than fixed for maximum actual Tflops.
Doczu
Member
We finally get the puddles we were promised
Watch them remove the puddles near release and we're going to have PuddleGate 2: Electric Boogaloo with:
- Compare videos
- DF chipping in with their tech breakdown
- Shitposting
- Cross forum drama
- More shitposting!
INC
Member
Good, i dont want 4k, its a complete waste of resources. Native 4k is a waste of time, even on a powerhouse pc.
I'll go with 1440p using dlss 2.0, and upscale ray tracing reflections all day.
Unless youre gonna play at 400% to look at this shit
That goes for all platforms pc, xbx and ps5
Bankai
Member
Yeah I know what you mean. Though DLSS 2.0 isn't possible.. because that's Nvidia you know. So unless AMD has its own alternative to it, which is baked into RDNA2, were stuck with shitty checkerboard rendering (shitty in comparison to DLSS 2.0 that is)
INC
Member
And I have a 2080 super, so it's very possible (sorry i was generalising, I didn't mean for ps5, my bad)
Dodkrake
Banned
Source?
Thirty7ven
Banned
Of course. 99% of the people posting have not a clue of how it works.
TBiddy
Member
It's an obvious bullshot.
Thirty7ven
Banned
Have you played the PS4 Pro Spidey? The IQ is amazing.
The only thing that would make this a "bullshot" would be the IQ, but if you were looking for jaggies you ain't gonna get them in the final game anyway.
Seems pretty representative of how the game looks, considering the footage that is out.
ZywyPL
Banned
I am really surprised by the amount of misunderstanding that surrounds variable clocks with a fixed power budget. My take is that people do not fully understand what in-frame bottlecks are in graphics and how they effect the overall performance of your GPU.
The best analogy that I have created is a road with cars. And please understand that it is far from perfect and I am sure someone else can come up with a better analogy than this
Going back to the road with cars: The width of the road and its speed limit is the number of CUs and the frequency respectively.
When every car has exactly the same speed you can pack the road with cars that go bumper to bumper. You are now performing at your maximum theoretical Tflops number.
Just like a road however this is a very unlikely scenario. Cars move at slightly different speeds which creates an actual throughput, or Tflops, that is lower than the theoretical max.
Now one car breaks for a few seconds. This does not only slow down that car down but actually cause downstream problems that take some time to untangle. So the problem is not just in that moment but it lingers afterwards.
This is the in-frame bottleneck problem.
If you can increase the speed of that car in that moment before it causes any ripple effects it results in a higher throughput of the road. And actually, if you were to lower the speed of all other cars for a few moments and then speed up again together with the car that performed the break, you also have a higher throughput through the entire encounter.
So the ability to modulate the speed of each car - both up and down - helps you reach an actual throughput that is much closer to your theoretical max than having fixed speeds.
Or in other words: If a road has a max speed of 120 mph, you are better off telling each car to drive 100 mph as long as you can modulate cars individually to both go slower and faster (up to 120mph) - that gives you the maximum amount of cars to your destination over time (actual Tflops). That is what Cerny is trying to do. Will he succeed? Time will tell - but variable clocks to get the flow synchronised is better than fixed for maximum actual Tflops.
You tried to make it simple but overcomplicated it anyway. Here's how variable clocks work:
It's really THAT simple.
Swipeyowifelike
Member
Like all the other bull shots easily made with the prior games photo mode that will inevitably be featured in this one.
Arun1910
Member
We know we aren't.
The 2 modes are 4K 60fps and another that runs at 30fps with Ray tracing on, resolution hasn't been stated.
Last edited:
TBiddy
Member
Like all the other bull shots easily made with the prior games photo mode that will inevitably be featured in this one.
Photo mode is what it is. Or in-engine. It won't look like it in real time gameplay.
Thirty7ven
Banned
But it does, and it gets really fucking boring when people who don't play the game act like they know what they are talking about. You don't need photo mode to lean the camera against a wall and watch it zoom in on Spiderman's incredibly detailed suit.
Swipeyowifelike
Member
Where in a photo mode does the slider "detail" and "cut scene mode" appear?
Shmunter
Member
Well, it's not impossible next gen. In game closeups like that should be achievable via loading in high quality assets instantly as needed, when it zooms out to regular swinging gameplay, lower quality can be swapped back in again. Seamless transitions etc.
Last edited:
TBiddy
Member
Theorerically speaking you may be right yeah. I'm willing to eat crow if that is the in-game real time fidelity, but bullshots are a reality in this business.
