...I'm sorry, you might be vetted, but some of your stuff is very hard to believe. While I'm pretty sure Sony would ask/ let Miyazaki know out of pure respect, he don't have jack shit to do with a remastered PS3 game. His work or not.. that and Bloodborne are Sony games.
From didn't build BB by themselves, a part of Japan studio could be working on the game headed by a guy from From..
Like why would Miyazaki even care if they remastered Demons or not? I thought he was done with those? I mean, they gave it away for free with plus.
And this is with ALL due respect.
I guess it's that time of the year.. sigh..
You and anyone else are entirely free to not believe me and its no skin off my back if you do or don't. If I knowingly spread false info then i get perma'd. And as I've already said, im entirely fine with giving a mod everything I have, but what i find ironic is that the thing you find hard to believe is something that isnt insider info but publicly available information.
Miyazaki saying he's okay with a remaster from an external studio isn't from me, that's from Miyazaki himself from an interview
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/de...nother-deve/1100-6441637/?ftag=GSS-05-10aaa0b
It just seems...kind of BS? Does your contact work for FromSoftware or somewhere close in the industry that would have this sort of information? Anyone can claim to have a "contact" or claim to be sort of verified. I'm not trying to offend you or be disrespectful, it just seems like you've been going purely based off of interviews. Game developers in the past have constantly said they weren't working on "x" project, and they were lying or trying not to create hype or hysteria.
Well, they could have a contact too. ;p
/s
A game developer who worked on an hit like Ori is likely to have some connections, too.
At this point, I'm not expecting a Bloodborne 2 at E3. However, I do expect Sony to capitalize on its success and a sequel to come out at some point. Regardless, if we see FromSoftware at E3 announcing a new game, I'd be very happy.
That's rich. A GAFer with "friends" in the industry questioning how an actual developer would have industry info.
The fact of the matter is though:
What im saying isn't anything really out there, it's exactly in line with publicly available information and quite frankly, common sense. The
only thing that's a secret that I've posted about is that From's ARPG wont be at this E3.
A sequel to Bloodborne has been said time and time again, from the man upstairs himself to be not in the cards. Its
you guys that continue to perpetuate this myth. Bloodborne 2 not being in development after the head of the company making that game repeadedly saying he's not developing and there are no plans to develop said game isn't anything "juicy" or worthy of hype and chaos. So not only has it been available to the public for nearly two years now, been reiterated once again earlier this year, im simply saying that it was once again confirmed to me by someone who is close to these projects.
So realistically, what's more likely. That what I'm saying that's in line with everything else directly from the studio turns out to be true, or that I'm lying and one developer is actually posting some super secret info rather than just their personal guess?
Anything else ive posted regarding their output (outside of a Demon Souls remaster and Demon Souls II not happening, both publicly available information) is speculation on my part based off of other available information. Such as what Fromsoft is currently working​ on, how and when they tend to start working on projects, how their release windows work.
And despite your accusations. Not one person has been able to dispute what I've said with really anything. I've been entirely honest about my claims thus far, who I am and who im not, and to what degree I know of what I claim and I'm able to materialize what my claims are based off of consistently, and yet no one else has.
I was thinking about this too.
Killer Queen should actually be straight up verified by a mod before making claims like this. I know he/she has spoken to a mod about it before, but they them self said they weren't really verified.
I mean, kind of hypocritical don't you think, considering you're also the one jumping to defend Thomas as an insider simply because he works in the industry.
Maybe you should have the same precautions towards him?
But to go even further. A few months ago (about March I think). I PM'd More_Badass requesting a temp ban for personal reasons. Inside said message, I told them as to where I got my information from on this specific topic since people had begun to start sporadically quoting me and using my posts in these threads (as people continue to do).
I can and will show either More_Badass or any mod interested exactly what I have for them to vet my claims. Though out of respect for the source of information in question, I won't be posting any of it publicly.
Edit: But since my original PM to More_Badass and despite me consistently
inviting any mod to question me further. I've not received any such request.