Davey Cakes
Member
I don't understand the argument for having a standard controller with a pointer or a standard controller that "splits."
What is so bad about the Wiimote+nunchuk? Even without both the motion controls and pointer taken into consideration, it's one of the most comfortable control setups you could ever come across. When you talk about having a controller that "splits" you're merely talking about a controller that can become like Wiimote+nunchuk non-permanently. But, that sounds flat-out dumb to be when the Wiimote+nunchuk as a permanent control style is perfectly fine. Yes, it takes an adjustment, but that's what Nintendo wants. Small adjustment and a great payoff.
People need to stop acting like they can't adjust to new things. I'll admit that the Wiimote doesn't have as many buttons as some would like, but to suggest that it would be as effective having a standard controller with a pointer on the end, especially when Nintendo themselves already tried it and found out that it "didn't work," is just ridiculous. That's really reaching.
What is so bad about the Wiimote+nunchuk? Even without both the motion controls and pointer taken into consideration, it's one of the most comfortable control setups you could ever come across. When you talk about having a controller that "splits" you're merely talking about a controller that can become like Wiimote+nunchuk non-permanently. But, that sounds flat-out dumb to be when the Wiimote+nunchuk as a permanent control style is perfectly fine. Yes, it takes an adjustment, but that's what Nintendo wants. Small adjustment and a great payoff.
People need to stop acting like they can't adjust to new things. I'll admit that the Wiimote doesn't have as many buttons as some would like, but to suggest that it would be as effective having a standard controller with a pointer on the end, especially when Nintendo themselves already tried it and found out that it "didn't work," is just ridiculous. That's really reaching.