I'm skipping it then.
Ticket prices are pretty high here, and I want value for my money.
For a summer blockbuster, ~1.5 hours simply isn't acceptable.
So I take it you skipped Dunkirk as well?
I'm skipping it then.
Ticket prices are pretty high here, and I want value for my money.
For a summer blockbuster, ~1.5 hours simply isn't acceptable.
I'm skipping it then.
Ticket prices are pretty high here, and I want value for my money.
For a summer blockbuster, ~1.5 hours simply isn't acceptable.
I can't believe I'm actually excited for the sequel to Thor: Dark World.
Amazing what happens when you cut out Portman and one broke girl.
Personally I think that movie would have been much better if it had ignored all of the characters we went on such an emotional journey with and cut to Gandalf untying his hair, hopping on an eagle, and headbanging his way into the sunset.You can just rewatch LOTR: Return of the King Extended Edition. I think the ending is longer than the runtime for this movie.
And add Taika Waititi, Hulk, and Jeff fuckin Goldblum.
Kat Dennings as She-hulk. Please.
Which ones specifically? I haven't noticed this problem.Fine by me. Superhero movies are getting way too long in exposition.
I marathon the extended trilogy at least once aYou can just rewatch LOTR: Return of the King Extended Edition. I think the ending is longer than the runtime for this movie.
Yup, I intend to pick up the DVD sometime in the future.So I take it you skipped Dunkirk as well?
For what it's worth, I'll still be watching the film, but probably on Netflix or DVD at a later date.This strikes me as a bizarre attitude. Surely value for your money would be getting the opportunity to see a great, entertaining film that you would happen to enjoy. Denying yourself the opportunity just because it's half an hour or so shorter in comparison a lot of other overlong, massively padded blockbusters seems like a mistake. I mean, I've seen movies at the cinema that were only about 80 minutes and I had a great time.
Which ones specifically? I haven't noticed this problem.
Which ones specifically? I haven't noticed this problem.
I'm excited as hell for Ragnarok but I just wonder how Taika is gonna fit what looks a like a lot of stuff into just an hour and a half without making it feel rushed.
The first 90 minutes of Batman v Superman is excruciating. You couldn't pay me to sit through that again.
Lmao do people get more creative with their trolling or do I have too much hope for them?I'm skipping it then.
Ticket prices are pretty high here, and I want value for my money.
For a summer blockbuster, ~1.5 hours simply isn't acceptable.
I'm skipping it then.
Ticket prices are pretty high here, and I want value for my money.
For a summer blockbuster, ~1.5 hours simply isn't acceptable.
"Hey man, you want to see this film called Casablanca they're playing down the street? I hear it's supposed to be like...the greatest film of all time or somethin!"
"I don't know, man. How long is it?"
"Uh...100 Minutes."
"100 MINUTES?! Fuck that, I want some bang for my buck! Let's just watch the Cure for Insomnia Directors Cut at home instead!"
I hope you have a big TV and a really good sound systemYup, I intend to pick up the DVD sometime in the future.
I'm skipping it then.
Ticket prices are pretty high here, and I want value for my money.
For a summer blockbuster, ~1.5 hours simply isn't acceptable.
Indeed, especially Marvel films as of late.Ehh, sometimes more is better. It's hard to tell without seeing it but I prefer my films with some meat.
I hope you have a big TV and a really good sound system
Indeed, especially Marvel films as of late.
Homecoming and Gaurdians 2 were quite lengthy, but the execution and pacing were fantastic; the minutes flew by, in my opinion.
I hope you have a big TV and a really good sound system
I refuse to believe Orochi ain't just trollin.
He's trollin.
..right?
Ehh, sometimes more is better. It's hard to tell without seeing it but I prefer my films with some meat.
I refuse to believe Orochi ain't just trollin.
He's trollin.
..right?
Terrible example, I'm absolutely not paying crazy money to watch some old ass black and white film that's on telly all the time anyway and probably on youtube by now; I'm not a millionaire.
That was a mistake.At first I wasn't sure, but the DVD post threw me a bit.
I mean, this is a Gaming Forum and this mindset is VERY prevalent on the gaming side soooo...I fear for the worst.
My playful vignette was actually set in the chaotic and uncertain time of 1942 when the film just came out, where people also had inexplicable access to the Cure for Insomnia BluRay.
I'm skipping it then.
Ticket prices are pretty high here, and I want value for my money.
For a summer blockbuster, ~1.5 hours simply isn't acceptable.