I just hope they keep iterating on the Far Cry formula. It would be a huge shame if FC4 is just FC3 with a new coat of paint.
Posts $67.6 Million Net Loss For Year, responds with far cry 4.
GG Ubisoft
Where is my Rainbow Six you bastards.
So cross gen means port, correct, this wasn't built from ground up for next gen.
Cross-gen?!! Would have rather had it release next year as a current-gen only title
They'll also ignore blatantly obvious symbolism.
Look in the mirror and repeat the question.
Are you guys kidding me?
You're insane.
He's right though. There's a white, blonde rich-looking western man who's toying with the life of an Asian man, clearly deemed inferior from their postures. Obviously we'll need to see some of the game to understand motivations, context etc, but just from that box art there's an obvious racial dynamic involved.
So cross gen means port, correct, this wasn't built from ground up for next gen.
I just got my PS3 months ago. Crossgen forever.
Didn't Ubi complain about how long the last generation was and said we needed new consoles?
This will another game That will be held back because of PS360.
I don't think they get any engine updates, but since it's derived work they still have to list it and probably pay some kind of fee.
No way this game will be 60FPS on consoles.
Yeah, same here. Just sitting here, chilling, waiting for people to talk about the game.
Although, since it is an open world game, IQ will probably have priority over FPS. If they have to choose it wil be 30FPS no doubt. So yeah, the chance may be bigger that 60FPS won't happen, but I wouldn't rule it out either.
Posts $67.6 Million Net Loss For Year, responds with far cry 4.
GG Ubisoft
Locking it to 30fps would not have done anything for the 360 version since it stayed under 30fps anyways.For the love of God just lock it at 30fps.
Couldn't play FC3 on 360 because of the atrocious framerate and sttutering.
Yep, I am not too hyped for this anymore.So cross gen means port, correct, this wasn't built from ground up for next gen.
One should look at how the dunia engine performed on a 7850 (PS4) and 7770 (Xbo) to get a rough idea how this game will look and run on PS4 or Xbox One.
60 FPS is out of the question imo unless they decide to go with low settings and a low resolution
If it's cross-gen and they don't up the quality of the assets big time (or add a whole buch of AA and stuff like that), I don't see why it wouldn't be possible. I'm not saying that it WILL be 60FPS, but I'm quite certain it is achievable at the very least. The fact that it is open world doesn't mean shit now that the new systems have RAM enough to support it easily. No GTAV magic coding needed here, and for now I'm pretty sure Watch_Dogs is an exception rather than the definition of what next-gen open world is capable of with it being 900p and stuff.
Although, since it is an open world game, IQ will probably have priority over FPS. If they have to choose it wil be 30FPS no doubt. So yeah, the chance may be bigger that 60FPS won't happen, but I wouldn't rule it out either.
He's right though. There's a white, blonde rich-looking western man who's toying with the life of an Asian man, clearly deemed inferior from their postures. Obviously we'll need to see some of the game to understand motivations, context etc, but just from that box art there's an obvious racial dynamic involved.
Far Cry 3 performed really well under i5 3570 stock and a HD 7850 on PC, so the game should be 60fps if the scale is the same, but this is Ubisoft we are talking about. They wouldn't know good performance if it hit their profit margins.
What about the gameplay and design itself?
Cross-gen?!! Would have rather had it release next year as a current-gen only title