Let me again point out that you again seem to actually believe your opinions of things are "facts" merely because you think they are right. They aren't the same thing and it's really getting tiring having you post inane defenses why your opinions are actually facts when called out on it.
Saying, "Orihime did not receive proper character development in Hueco Mundo." is, in no way whatsoever, an opinion. Saying, "Orihime is a bad character." is. There is a severe difference and it seems it it you who doesn't understand the distinction.
The fact that Orihime drastically changes as a character, yet was not provided any reason for the changes, suggests that she did not go through character development. This
isn't an opinion, this is what actually happened in Bleach. The same thing happened to Rukia too.
In any good story, there is always some form of character development that explains how characters change and how they develop throughout the story. This didn't happen with Orihime or Rukia, nor did it happen with Tousen and Gin. Even Naruto has character development. The problem isn't necessarily that Bleach has to conform to storytelling standards, but rather it
tries to portray character development but fails so miserably at it.