• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

In swimming, countries use B teams in relay qualifying, A teams in finals

Status
Not open for further replies.

Korey

Member
Hardcore Olympics fans may already know this, but more casual followers may find this fact interesting:

The USA swim team is so dominant/deep that they regularly have their B team swim the preliminaries so that their best swimmers can rest for the finals and their individual events.

What many people don't know is that swimmers who only compete in the preliminaries (and get swapped out for the finals) also get the medal...not just the people who swam the finals. So even though you see 4 guys or girls on the podium, up to 4 other people also got medals.

Therefore, winning a single relay event means that up to 8 American swimmers get a gold medal.



This is especially true for the medley relay (4 people, each who do a different stroke): USA always sends their #2s (for each stroke) to do the prelims, and then have their #1s (completely different people) do the finals. So for example, both #1 and #2 American breaststroke swimmers can get a gold medal in the same event.

For the freestyle relay, this means you can just be the 6th or 7th fastest American freestyle swimmer and still get to go to the Olympics and get a gold medal. That's exactly what happened this year with prelim-only swimmers Jimmy Feigen, Blake Pieroni, Clark Smith, and Gunnar Bentz.



At the 2016 Rio Olympics, USA won gold in 5 out of 6 swimming relay events (and silver in one).


4×100 freestyle relay (men)
MjMj2i1.png
Prelims:
aZZ0Sw3.png
Jimmy Feigen,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Blake Pieroni,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Anthony Ervin; Finals:
aZZ0Sw3.png
Caeleb Dressel,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Michael Phelps,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Ryan Held*,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Nathan Adrian

4×200 freestyle relay (men)
MjMj2i1.png
Prelims:
aZZ0Sw3.png
Clark Smith,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Jack Conger,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Gunnar Bentz; Finals:
aZZ0Sw3.png
Conor Dwyer,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Townley Haas,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Ryan Lochte*,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Michael Phelps

4×200 freestyle relay (women)
MjMj2i1.png
Prelims:
aZZ0Sw3.png
Missy Franklin,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Melanie Margalis,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Cierra Runge; Finals:
aZZ0Sw3.png
Allison Schmitt*,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Leah Smith,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Maya DiRado,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Katie Ledecky

4×100 medley relay (men)
MjMj2i1.png
Prelims:
aZZ0Sw3.png
David Plummer,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Kevin Cordes,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Tom Shields,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Caeleb Dressel; Finals:
aZZ0Sw3.png
Ryan Murphy,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Cody Miller,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Michael Phelps,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Nathan Adrian

4×100 medley relay (women)
MjMj2i1.png
Prelims:
aZZ0Sw3.png
Olivia Smoliga,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Katie Meili,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Kelsi Worrell,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Abbey Weitzeil; Finals:
aZZ0Sw3.png
Kathleen Baker,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Lilly King,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Dana Vollmer,
aZZ0Sw3.png
Simone Manuel


So in just these 5 events this year, 33 Americans got gold medals even though only 17 people swam in the finals. Doing this basically doubled the number of Americans who went home with a gold medal.
 
Maybe it sounds scummy on paper, but if it's allowed by the rules then why not?

How awful would it be if they didn't do this? Imagine, you put America into the finals, and then get bumped from the team for a bigger name like Phelps... and they give you nothing.

It still only counts as one gold in the medal tallies, so I don't really have a problem.
 
How awful would it be if they didn't do this? Imagine, you put America into the finals, and then get bumped from the team for a bigger name like Phelps... and they give you nothing.

It still only counts as one gold in the medal tallies, so I don't really have a problem.

Exactly this.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
Swimming already has too many events anyway, this just adds another layer of bullshit.

EDIT: Oh, same medal count in the tallies? Don't mind then. Little cheeky but whatever, the real problem is that there are like 20 opportunities to take Gold in swimming.
 

ShinAmano

Member
This is the same as the office assistant of a super bowl team getting a ring...one championship a bunch of awards to the folks that made it happen.
 

boiled goose

good with gravy
For "team" sports, the bench gets medals too right... so meh?

Same with backup players who never touched the ball in Super Bowl.

The medal counts count wins, not people with medals.
 
It's only one on the tally so it's fine.

Bit weird to be one of the prelimers though. You've got to constantly be wondering if you really deserve it.
 
In my opinion this is cheating. Do other countries do this as well? The rules should be changed. You shouldnt be allowed to rest and save your strenght for the final. Also ridiculous to give somone who didnt swim the final a medal. Did you pass the finish line? No. Olympics are a joke.
 

Lkr

Member
It still only counts as 1 in the tally. If other countries want to get dominant they should probably pour money into HS and college level athletics at the insane level the US does.
The entire basketball team and soccer teams that get gold all get a medal but that counts for one as well.

So what is OP's point?


^to the post above, swimming is a team sport, hence swim team.
 
So they're competing on unequal terms then if USA swimmers are rested for the finals as they didn't have to do the preliminaries, while swimmers from other countries are not.

Doesn't sound right
 

Lkr

Member
The scummy part seem to be the resting swimmers until the final part.
Is having a deep bench scummy in other sports? USA women's basketball has a 12 player rotation, I assume most other countries competing have issues putting together a starting lineup.
If the men's basketball team didn't play Melo or KD until the gold medal match, would you have a different opinion? It gives other countries a better shot to eliminate the US

Again, any country can do this. The focus on amateur athletics in the US is insane, there is so much government spending on it.
 

Nokagi

Unconfirmed Member
So the US has a better and deeper bench for the team relays. And? It still only counts as one gold. So the back team who also put in work gets to take home a medal and that's suppose to be upsetting or something?

Btw the whole basketball team gets a medal too . Crazy I know.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
Who says other countries can't do the same?

Other countries can only do the same if they have an equally deep pool of relay swimmers, which is a pretty big ask. I must admit, it does seem unfair on reflection that the best possible hypothetical 4-person relay team could still not get Gold because they had to do two events. I feel like it would be pretty fair to restrict the relay team in the finals to the same time that swim in the preliminaries.
 

Drazgul

Member
How awful would it be if they didn't do this? Imagine, you put America into the finals, and then get bumped from the team for a bigger name like Phelps... and they give you nothing.

It still only counts as one gold in the medal tallies, so I don't really have a problem.

I meant scummy in that they get switched to begin with, of course if you participate you deserve a medal too.
 
Yeah Australia does this as well. In the prelim relays the announcers often tell you that these times arent indicative of how the finals will go as the US and Australia has the B team racing the event and other countries will have more of their A list swimmers in the prelims.
 
It still only counts as 1 in the tally. If other countries want to get dominant they should probably pour money into HS and college level athletics at the insane level the US does.
The entire basketball team and soccer teams that get gold all get a medal but that counts for one as well.

So what is OP's point?


^to the post above, swimming is a team sport, hence swim team.
If it's a team sport there should be a maximum of 1 person competing per country per event, which as far as I see is not the case. There can be multiple people from one country in the final. The rules as they are are a joke as it is not a team sport nor an individual sport. It benefits countries like the USA which can use team sport tactics to increase their chances in a sport that is not actually team based.
 

Lkr

Member
If it's a team sport there should be a maximum of 1 person competing per country per event, which as far as I see is not the case. There can be multiple people from one country in the final. The rules as they are are a joke as it is not a team sport nor an individual sport. It benefits countries like the USA which can use team sport tactics to increase their chances in a sport that is not actually team based.
Russia, India and China all have larger populations, it's easier for them to field a deep team.
Multiple entries from the same country can compete in track race so I don't see the difference.
 

mrklaw

MrArseFace
The scummy part seem to be the resting swimmers until the final part.

this. I suppose technically the 'team' qualified for the final. but it was those individuals that posted the time, and those individuals should be in the final.


You wouldn't be able to do such a thing in individual events - 'oh hey John, I can't be arsed to do the first couple of rounds of eliminations - you're pretty good, can you do them for me?'
 

mre

Golden Domers are chickenshit!!
If it's a team sport there should be a maximum of 1 person competing per country per event, which as far as I see is not the case. There can be multiple people from one country in the final. The rules as they are are a joke as it is not a team sport nor an individual sport. It benefits countries like the USA which can use team sport tactics to increase their chances in a sport that is not actually team based.
Swimming is both a team sport and an individual sport. This is only referring to the relay races which are team races. You can't have someone else swim the prelims and qualify for a final and then swap them out for another in an individual race. That's not allowed.

This is akin to an NBA team resting a superstar in the final few games of the season so that they're fresh for the playoffs.

As long as the rules are the same for everybody, then it's fair.
 

Pakkidis

Member
You need to win the preliminaries to make it to the finals correct? If so I don't see what the problem is. They contributed to the win.
 
Swimming is both a team sport and an individual sport. This is only referring to the relay races which are team races. You can't have someone else swim the prelims and qualify for a final and then swap them out for another in an individual race. That's not allowed.

This is akin to an NBA team resting a superstar in the final few games of the season so that they're fresh for the playoffs.

As long as the rules are the same for everybody, then it's fair.
I misunderstood the OP then. Thought this was for all the events not just relay. Sure if it's just relay that's fair.
 

Korey

Member
Yeah, I mean, they participated so what's the problem here? Very strange thread.


It still only counts as 1 in the tally. If other countries want to get dominant they should probably pour money into HS and college level athletics at the insane level the US does.
The entire basketball team and soccer teams that get gold all get a medal but that counts for one as well.

So what is OP's point?


^to the post above, swimming is a team sport, hence swim team.

The point is that this is an interesting little known fact.

Most people just see Michael Phelps, Ryan Lochte, Nathan Adrian on the podium all the time without realizing that 4 other people they've never heard of also got the same medal for the same event.

I'm American, btw.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom