.Vinci said:The 360 version indeed looks better. Doesn't somehow make the PS3 version shit though, so long as the game is still intact.
.Vinci said:The 360 version indeed looks better. Doesn't somehow make the PS3 version shit though, so long as the game is still intact.
CozMick said:Man Furismo Jive it is then? :lol
Each first time I see a bird in a video game I try to shoot it down. (MGS + Stinger + Crows = Win).skyfinch said:I'll take the one with less birds. Distracting, noisy lil' fuckers. Every god damn morning outside my window!
esc said:I love this statement and its variations:
"I feel sorry for you guys who can't enjoy a game without nitpicking at the graphical details."
I feel sorry for you guys for being blind.
CozMick said:Man Furismo Jive it is then? :lol
skyfinch said:Vaseline would have dried up a long time ago by the time Furismo is released.
esc said:I love this statement and its variations:
"I feel sorry for you guys who can't enjoy a game without nitpicking at the graphical details."
I feel sorry for you guys for being blind.
$2,000,000,000 says noJaxJag said:It sort of amazes me that the 360 came out a full year ahead of the PS3, and here were are almost 5 years later and multiplatform games still tend to look better on the 360.
Microsoft must have done a pretty amazing job designing the hardware.
I wasn't talking about what people valued. I was referring to the fact that people seem to think sub-HD vs 720p is a "minor" difference. Maybe if you don't have an HD TV or monitor, sure. I still buy sub-HD titles, but the difference in this case is apparent.Vinci said:The lack of extreme emphasis on presentation does not make someone blind. It means they value other qualities of the game that are still intact and those qualities are not offset by the lessened PQ. Your mileage my vary, obviously - and if it's something that does, in fact, render the version worthless to you, then I do 'feel sorry for you' if you're unable to play the title.
CozMick said:Man Furismo Jive it is then? :lol
Well, I don't mean from a durability standpoint obviously.CozMick said:$2,000,000,000 says no
JaxJag said:Well, I don't mean from a durability standpoint obviously.
I just find it amazing, especially considering all the Xbox 1.5 talk.
I even remember Sony calling the 360 a Xbox 1.5.
CozMick said:Man Furismo Jive it is then? :lol
JaxJag said:It sort of amazes me that the 360 came out a full year ahead of the PS3, and here we are almost 5 years later and multiplatform games still tend to look better on the 360.
Microsoft must have done a pretty amazing job designing the hardware.
this game has been in developpement since the 360 was available. no wonderJaxJag said:It sort of amazes me that the 360 came out a full year ahead of the PS3, and here we are almost 5 years later and multiplatform games still tend to look better on the 360.
Microsoft must have done a pretty amazing job designing the hardware.
Majine said:I seem to fail in finding a decent PS3 gameplay videos on the internet. Either it's the official trailers, Offscreen, or 360 gameplay. Halp.
Majine said:I seem to fail in finding a decent PS3 gameplay videos on the internet. Either it's the official trailers, Offscreen, or 360 gameplay. Halp.
If you enjoying it why exchange it?LovingSteam said:So I purchased the PS3 version and I am in love with the game. My only disappointment is the jaggies. Is the 360 version truly that different even if I am not playing on an HDMI capable system? If it is I will go and exchange the PS3 for the 360 version. Just need some input from you helpful folks.
I'm playing on the 360 through a HDMI cable running at 1080p.LovingSteam said:So I purchased the PS3 version and I am in love with the game. My only disappointment is the jaggies. Is the 360 version truly that different even if I am not playing on an HDMI capable system? If it is I will go and exchange the PS3 for the 360 version. Just need some input from you helpful folks.
JaxJag said:It sort of amazes me that the 360 came out a full year ahead of the PS3, and here we are almost 5 years later and multiplatform games still tend to look better on the 360.
Microsoft must have done a pretty amazing job designing the hardware.
Loudninja said:If you enjoying it why exchange?
INDIGO_CYCLOPS said:Does Gamestop allow opened copies of games to be exchanged, but for a different platform ? I didn't realize the huge difference in detail..
LovingSteam said:I just called. If you have the Special Edition for PS3 you won't be able to receive the same for the 360. But they will swap.
INDIGO_CYCLOPS said:Interesting. Thanks for letting me know!
Casualty list, please.EviLore said:30 people axed.
Treat this thread like it's inherently a cesspool and it'll be a cesspool, but it'll be due to the "LOL GAMEFAQS GUYS" and "LOL 4CHANNERS IN THIS THREAD" and "WOW THIS THREAD IS RIDICULOUS GO PLAY GAMES GUYZ," not people trying to make an accurate assessment of the differences in a multiplatform release.
This is what I'd like to know, but "bad" is subjective. Safe bet is to wait for the digitalfoundry comparison. I'm certain they're working on that as I type this.How "bad" is the framerate on the PS3? I'm quite picky with framerates and erratic (Dragon Age PS3) ones bother me, is RDR like that at all? I can put up with dips in cities/towns.
Takuan said:Casualty list, please.
LovingSteam said:No problem man. If you exchange in the next couple of days please let me know your experience. I am so close to doing it but two things are stopping me: 1) I have 6 hours invested on the PS3 and don't want to start over; and 2) My system isn't HDMI compatible so I am not sure if the jaggies will still be on the 360 version.
CaseyTappy said:Didn't Magnus compare the 360 version on Component with the HDMI PS3 version in the original thread and found less jaggies on the 360 ?
I pity your ban finger. You'll be getting RSI soon if we have any more threads like this.EviLore said:Ranger X
LordPhoque
Verapamil
scoobs
Billy Mitchell
Tom Penny
reKon
NHale
White Sharingan
Fix The Scientist
Timbuktu
Jtones
Otrebor Nightmarecoat
lethial
Launch
wizword
Felix Lighter
jaypah
SamBa
WickedLaharl
CozMick
DMPrince
RandomVince
acevans2
KratosKilla
Duke Togo
UFRA
Esteban
Lots of juniors not coming back.
Omiee said:hey guys the game still doesnt come out here so i still have a day to decide.
my question is, on your tv u have the option for sharpness or something could that make a difference for the ps3 version being a little blurry
also if i dont care about graphics and only about framerate, how does that compare to the 360 version cuz i realy dont wanna search 100 pages =P
The difference between HDMI and component is pretty subtle. Mostly just color differences. The image quality (as in, jaggies and stuff) isn't much different if at all.LovingSteam said:No problem man. If you exchange in the next couple of days please let me know your experience. I am so close to doing it but two things are stopping me: 1) I have 6 hours invested on the PS3 and don't want to start over; and 2) My system isn't HDMI compatible so I am not sure if the jaggies will still be on the 360 version.
EviLore said:Ranger X
LordPhoque
Verapamil
scoobs
Billy Mitchell
Tom Penny
reKon
NHale
White Sharingan
Fix The Scientist
Timbuktu
Jtones
Otrebor Nightmarecoat
lethial
Launch
wizword
Felix Lighter
jaypah
SamBa
WickedLaharl
CozMick
DMPrince
RandomVince
acevans2
KratosKilla
Duke Togo
UFRA
Esteban
Lots of juniors not coming back.
Mad_Ban said:How "bad" is the framerate on the PS3? I'm quite picky with framerates and erratic (Dragon Age PS3) ones bother me, is RDR like that at all? I can put up with dips in cities/towns.
Jim said:It seriously doesn't. Having played every 360 and PS3 version of GTAIV + expansions and now RDR, I think the PS3 version looks quite good still. It's certainly not blurry like the original GTAIV, it's crisp in comparison (more like BoGT), and the framerate is way better.
I end up keeping the PS3 version. It's not that dramatic at all. But continue.
EviLore said:PS3 version has framerate drops, but average framerate is much higher than GTAIV. Image quality, though, is just as bad. It's a shimmery, blurry mess.
Chrange said:
I'd have done it better, but I'm at work :lol