WHAT?
You didn't throw out your PC already?
WHAT?
Almost all major tentpole third-party titles are going to be released on current-gen systems through the end of 2014 at least... and possibly into 2015 as well. Have any third-party games even been confirmed as next-gen exclusive as yet besides The Witcher 3 and Deep Down? I'm not sure I've heard of any.But how long will they really do this? Of course they can't ignore the huge install base for the holiday business, but after that? They will try to sell their generic blockbusters for next-gen without the unpleasant used market. And this anti-consumer shit will work, I'm afraid. Sad times ahead...
Then why wait?
I get the fear and anger with the rumors and statements from MS, but Sony has been getting a seriously free ride all of this time. I wish I could believe that the tempest in a teacup for all of this would get someone to reconsider, but I don't. Publishers are the major beneficiary to how this works, so that's how you know who is really pushing for it. Shitting on MS is popular and funny because they say just enough to get themselves further into trouble with those that already have it out for them, but they haven't done anything yet and they aren't alone in getting these things made and implemented.
Why is the silence unsettling? They're not going to come out and say "Hey guys yeah, we're not having DRM, thx 4 the tweets"
E3 is less than 2 weeks away. They'll address it in media interviews.
i think they won't have system wide DRM ala Xbone but instead it will be per publisher. which means 90% of them will have it.
Just a note to anyone planning to switch to PC games if both consoles have used game fees, trading games in on PC isn't exactly an option.
It is about the money, if MS are able to get away with the used game fee, I'm sure SONY will follow suit.
Why is the silence unsettling? They're not going to come out and say "Hey guys yeah, we're not having DRM, thx 4 the tweets"
Actually Sony should respond now and not waste time on BS during E3.
They have been open for everything else, so yes I am pretty sure they would have come out and said it by now.
Letting MS take the heat for this is a better strategy, people will be weary of the topic when they announce it.
"This is why I love PlayStation fans - the passion bucket overflows," Sony's head of hardware marketing John Koller wrote in response to the campaign.
"Humbled by the outpouring of passionate PlayStation fans and their willingness to talk to us directly," said SCEA producer Nick Accordino. "Please know that we hear you. <3"
"I love passionate #PlayStation Fans!!", Sony Worldwide Studios product boss Scott Rohde added.
They have been open for everything else, so yes I am pretty sure they would have come out and said it by now.
Letting MS take the heat for this is a better strategy, people will be weary of the topic when they announce it.
I don't think that's entirely true, because I can't see publishers allowing one system to do one thing and one do another.
larger venue, less confusion. Instead of people talking on their own (like the buffoons at MS did), they can make it "official" at E3.
I get the fear and anger with the rumors and statements from MS, but Sony has been getting a seriously free ride all of this time. I wish I could believe that the tempest in a teacup for all of this would get someone to reconsider, but I don't. Publishers are the major beneficiary to how this works, so that's how you know who is really pushing for it. Shitting on MS is popular and funny because they say just enough to get themselves further into trouble with those that already have it out for them, but they haven't done anything yet and they aren't alone in getting these things made and implemented.
Not sure how people are taking anything new from a summary article.
Just a note to anyone planning to switch to PC games if both consoles have used game fees, trading games in on PC isn't exactly an option.
How successful have DRM protests been in the PC world?
They have talked on their own since February.
I'm not sure petitioning Sony is the right thing to do here. I think, instead, people should put pressure on the big third parties, those who the console manufacturers are desperate to court. Sony may be thrust into a position where these third parties have enough power to force Sony's hand. Make it clear to *them* that this is a bad idea, and we'll see where it goes.
They have been open for everything else, so yes I am pretty sure they would have come out and said it by now.
Fucking disturbing that they didn't just outright deny it if anything.
larger venue, less confusion. Instead of people talking on their own (like the buffoons at MS did), they can make it "official" at E3.
The list of what they HAVEN'T been open about for the PS4 dwarfs what they HAVE been open about. Games, specs..what else have they been solid about?
Here's a hint Geoff: Sony has all the power here because publishers do not want (and cannot afford) to throw away such a large chunk of the market. They would be crucified by their shareholders.
They would be losing billions if they refused to publish games for the PS4 because Sony were to demand used games still work as they do now.
Sony can do whatever it wants, and they will have no choice but to fall in line.
That, or a confirmation they will have the same DRM will happen at E3.What. You just get House or Tretton or whoever to make a press statement. DRM on used games will wholly be at the discretion of the 3rd party publisher and will not be enforced or promoted in any way or form by Sony. Thanks!
I think it depends. They've certainly effected sales of certain titles when there's enough bad publicity. Considering it's PC, it's a title by title, publisher by publisher basis.
Didn't Ubisoft recently announce that they were moving away from their DRM model?
http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/09/05/ubisoft-officially-ditches-always-on-pc-drm"We have listened to feedback, and since June last year our policy for all of PC games is that we only require a one-time online activation when you first install the game," she said. "From then you are free to play the game offline."
Probably the easiest ride ever considering what MS has gotten since the 21st. 3 months of no threads, only positive talk. Even after MS announced what they did, you would think some would put 2 and 2 together but even then they were talking about how Sony is the console they are choosing because they are focused on the gamer. It has been mind boggling to watch.
They have talked on their own since February.
No new information....
What else is there?
Oh sorry.
TV, TV, TV, TV, TV, TV, TV, TV, TV, Sports, TV, TV, Kinect, TV, TV, TV
What else is there?
Oh sorry.
TV, TV, TV, TV, TV, TV, TV, TV, TV, Sports, TV, TV, Kinect, TV, TV, TV
They have talked on their own since February.
why do that when you can make a big deal out of it in front of everyone at E3, at the same time publicly shaming MS?
Realistically I expect Sony to leave it up to the publishers, not make it a system-wide DRM. That way they can play the 'good guy', yet still keep the companies like EA that seem to be pushing hard for second-hand/used game DRM happy.
Fuck is this?
But they were consistant. Vauge as fuck but consitant.
Microsoft was all over the place with various different messages.
Knux-Future]There is no favoritism at play here (well there is some for specific people sure). Microsoftet the cat out the bag while Sony kept their mouths shut (i.e kept it vauge)
You are very, very wrong about this statement, unfortunately.
Here's a hint Geoff: Sony has all the power here because publishers do not want (and cannot afford) to throw away such a large chunk of the market. They would be crucified by their shareholders.
They would be losing billions if they refused to publish games for the PS4 because Sony were to demand used games still work as they do now.
Sony can do whatever it wants, and they will have no choice but to fall in line.
I can't speak for anyone else, but I think that "games" and "specs" are mostly what people care them being solid about.