travisbickle
Member
There's a lot of funny quotes in there.
Yeah but no one would want ddr3 in 2013.
Yeah but no one would want ddr3 in 2013.
It's funny people are giving Crytek shit for that old thread when it's likely they had a lot to do with the current consoles having 8GB of RAM.
You mean 'shouldn't'?Example 638,384,737 why Gaf members should be in charge of the videogame industry.
Considering what devs managed to achieve with 512MB, I have faith they'll create wonderful games with ~5GB.
You know what I want. Valve to make an Steam OS based PC and market it as "a console that can be upgraded as the user wants."
One for the GAF history books, for sure.
Rockstar will go to the moon with 5GB.
Shut up and get back to work.
When they stop making games for their 'prettiness' then they can talk, until you achieve true immersion through story telling and incredible gameplay, shut your face. Gameplay > Graphics.
I'm out.Is this man serious or what? This is why PC gamers are very dangerous to gaming.
PS4 already has more DDR5 than even $1000 graphics for PC and it only costs $400 in United States. Why is he asking Sony to do more, how can he not be grateful? Sony have given us everything we could ask for for a cheap price (top end PC hardware and above PC graphics on Sony exclusives) and PC gamers like him want to destroy that so that only the rich will be able to afford this activity. If we continue this way, gaming as a hobby will be equivalent to yachting.
I thought we were laughing at the reaction to their claim in that thread, but apparently not.
Wasn't at least one of the new consoles pushed by game developers to 8GB RAM quite close to the reveal?
Example 638,384,737 why Gaf members should be in charge of the videogame industry.
In not trying to play the PC master race card here, but it's relevant to point out that most people in the PC building thread still suggest people only build PCs with 8gb.
Is this man serious or what? This is why PC gamers are very dangerous to gaming.
PS4 already has more DDR5 than even $1000 graphics for PC and it only costs $400 in United States. Why is he asking Sony to do more, how can he not be grateful? Sony have given us everything we could ask for for a cheap price (top end PC hardware and above PC graphics on Sony exclusives) and PC gamers like him want to destroy that so that only the rich will be able to afford this activity. If we continue this way, gaming as a hobby will be equivalent to yachting.
They've said they wanted 64 gb of ram in the past. They are nuts.
Is this man serious or what? This is why PC gamers are very dangerous to gaming.
PS4 already has more DDR5 than even $1000 graphics for PC and it only costs $400 in United States. Why is he asking Sony to do more, how can he not be grateful? Sony have given us everything we could ask for for a cheap price (top end PC hardware and above PC graphics on Sony exclusives) and PC gamers like him want to destroy that so that only the rich will be able to afford this activity. If we continue this way, gaming as a hobby will be equivalent to yachting.
Is this man serious or what? This is why PC gamers are very dangerous to gaming.
PS4 already has more DDR5 than even $1000 graphics for PC and it only costs $400 in United States. Why is he asking Sony to do more, how can he not be grateful? Sony have given us everything we could ask for for a cheap price (top end PC hardware and above PC graphics on Sony exclusives) and PC gamers like him want to destroy that so that only the rich will be able to afford this activity. If we continue this way, gaming as a hobby will be equivalent to yachting.
It can easily be filled up when you haven't released a well-optimized game in a decade.
Crytek is extremely bad at optimization
Crytek is extremely bad at optimization
How so? People in that thread are talking about GDDR5 RAM. Since 8GB DDR3 RAM would be dumb gaming wise as demonstrated by the xbox one. It is good non-gaming purposes, which is what MS was going for.Example 638,384,737 why Gaf members should be in charge of the videogame industry.
In not trying to play the PC master race card here, but it's relevant to point out that most people in the PC building thread still suggest people only build PCs with 8gb.
Uh no? Time to remember Crysis what was?
Good Lord..the Crow waiting to be served would wipe out the species.
Crytek's problem is that instead of focusing on "what I can do with what I have.", they focus on "What I could do if I had more."
Developing for multiple platforms is a bit more challenging than developing for one.Sounds like Crytek will make shit console ports for PS4/XB1 in the future regardless of specs available to them and are just lowering the expectations so they dont get much flak when they release their shit "limited by hardware" games.
No Crytek, the limiting factor is you in this care. Im sure ND/SSM will beat any technical feats you can do easily without spewing such BS.
Crytek is extremely bad at optimization
Crytek's problem is that instead of focusing on "what I can do with what I have.", they focus on "What I could do if I had more."
Ryse fps it's not exactly encouraging.Developing for multiple platforms is a bit more challenging than developing for one.
We've seen what Crytek can do when developing for just one(Crysis, Ryse) and the results are impressive.