• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Battlefield 1 leaked, Oct 18, Harlem Hellfighter DLC

What are you most excited to hear about today?


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm the only one who wants to hear the audio of the game? seriously DICE are the best developers when it comes to the audio department, Battlefield and Battlefront sound amazing on my A50s
 

Saty

Member
Making fun of CoD's dated graphics but then using a the old-ass .GIF format rather than the superior .WebM to tease Battlefield.

Can't write this shit up.
 
Destruction is anti defender by default though. And the franchise was never built on destruction in the first place. The games played just fine without the feature.

Seems like you would have to have construction in the game as well if you want to have balance.

Sure, it didn't start with destruction but that and the vehicles is now what sets it apart from every single other postcard shooting gallery fps. Destruction didn't unbalance defending in BF3/4.

I'm curious - would you prefer no destruction or do you just think destruction adds nothing to the gameplay? I mean I'm scratching my head how anyone could not want it in the games.
 

Dreathlock

Member
So when is the reveal? The site says its 22:00 CEST but i heard there is a reveal 3 hours earlier? Whats up with that?
 
Cool also remember guys this is not the first time that we see them on the Battlefield franchise sort of, do you remember the air superiority game mode on Battlefield 3?

zLlTe6Y.jpg


lzJHLZ5.jpg


16NRAq4.png


WW1 HYPE!
 

elyetis

Member
Yes please. One of the coolest things in frostbite is the destructability. It's a shame it keeps getting scaled back.
'levolution' is nice to bring bigger scale change during a game. But it really doesn't compare to what dynamic destruction bring to the table.
Each time there is an explosion on the ground, and it remain perfectly flat, a puppy die somewhere. ( which sadly happen far too often in bf4, at least from what I experienced when I went back to the game acouple weeks ago )

edit : balloon-like airship statement seem like a huge bait/trap, I wouldn't read too much into it ( even if I do hope it mean WWI
I
)
 

Yoday

Member
Okay, no more. I'm staying out of any BF related discussions until the reveal. I'm just glad that we have gotten practically nothing as far as leaks.
 
I'm also very excited to see how the game will perform on a current gen only development, Battlefield 4 suffered due to the 360 and PS3 versions
 

SteveWD40

Member
I guess my question is this: unless they make it alternate history how are they going to have the hamster wheel of weapon unlocks / upgrades to keep people playing?

I am not saying it's a good thing, but I know they felt BC2 didn't have enough, BF3/4 went far too heavy on this side and it it's a big part of their DLC strategy.

WW1 weapons:

Many are just versions of the same rifle, most are mounted

Edit: and no attachments other than maybe an early version of a scope.
 
Okay, no more. I'm staying out of any BF related discussions until the reveal. I'm just glad that we have gotten practically nothing as far as leaks.

I'd rather have something leaked to not have this unbareable discussion fuled by hopes and dreams.

I just hope the teaser isn't deceptive and we will get a game that is set in the OG Word Wars.
 

Keasar

Member
Can't say I'm a little disappointed that it probably isn't that attractive sequel to BF2142, but if they go alternative WW1 with weird tech etc. I am all up for it. Heck, go super weird tech and I am really sold:
16cc6996cbcbdd42e53cb1418362e788.jpg


Just don't make it pure WW1 cause the tanks would kinda suck to play.
 

mabec

Member
Lets face it, they are FINALLY going to live up to the fanbase highest wishes and make a remake of Battlefield 2, calling it Battlefield 2 Two.

izcok4m.gif
 

Alexious

Member
Can't say I'm a little disappointed that it probably isn't that attractive sequel to BF2142, but if they go alternative WW1 with weird tech etc. I am all up for it. Heck, go super weird tech and I am really sold:
16cc6996cbcbdd42e53cb1418362e788.jpg


Just don't make it pure WW1 cause the tanks would kinda suck to play.

I'm afraid they'll go alternative WW1 without the weird tech, which would make it not that interesting for me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom