• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

First official Thor 3: Ragnarok Synopsis

Status
Not open for further replies.

OldRoutes

Member
So what's the range limit on Thor's ability to call Mjolnir? Whatever the script demands at the time?

I guess it depends on who is Odin at that time. From that synopsis, it looks like that since Hela is seemingly taking over, she might have control over who is worthy to carry Mjolnir.
 
You don't know who Taika Waititi is, do you?

he wrote his previous films. the majority of his charm will be lost as just a director for hire. I have no idea why they even hired him without getting his input on the screenplay. it's pretty stupid of them.

at least the screenwriter is different from the previous two, but i still think the movie will be average at best. I'm glad they subbed in Hulk to make this more tolerable. Hopefully ruffalo gets some screentime too. we'll see how it pans out.
 

OldRoutes

Member
he wrote his previous films. the majority of his charm will be lost as just a director for hire. I have no idea why they even hired him without getting his input on the screenplay. it's pretty stupid of them.

at least the screenwriter is different from the previous two, but i still think the movie will be average at best. I'm glad they subbed in Hulk to make this more tolerable. Hopefully ruffalo gets some screentime too. we'll see how it pans out.

I wouldn't look too much into this if I were you. That reads like Hollywood politics, and I have no doubt that Taika was involved greatly with the shooting script and the tone of the story, at least.
 
depending on how much input he has then he would be given credit no? isn't that generally the rule due to writers guild concerns and all that. just think it's bizarre that they hire such a comedic talent and then ask him to simply direct, he should be at least cowriter forreal.
 
This year alone has:

Wonder Woman
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 2
Logan
Justice League
Spider-Man Homecoming

That's a lot of competition just to say that Thor 3 will win based on a 2 sentence synopsis.

I wouldn't say Thor 3 will "win" but 2 wasn't a bad movie, just average in a sea of "great".

Comments so far seem to indicate marvel knows what mistakes were made...and a lot of what drug down Thor 1 and 2 was nonsense relationship crap shoehorned in the plot, and Natalie Portman and Anthony Hopkins sleepwalking through their roles.

Still need some Darcy in there though
 

Slayven

Member
I wouldn't say Thor 3 will "win" but 2 wasn't a bad movie, just average in a sea of "great".

Comments so far seem to indicate marvel knows what mistakes were made...and a lot of what drug down Thor 1 and 2 was nonsense relationship crap shoehorned in the plot, and Natalie Portman and Anthony Hopkins sleepwalking through their roles.

Still need some Darcy in there though

Mewmew will never not be hilarious
 
One day after the MCU has come and gone and Marvel is feeling a bit more experimental with their solo hero movies I'd love to see a Thor God Butcher/God Bomb live action adaptation. That was the definition of epic.

Are you reading unworthy Thor? Because it's pretty up there so far
 

Staccat0

Fail out bailed
My only real hope (aside from desiring a world with good movies in it) is that they do some weird gymnastics that somehow makes the dumb cave shit from AoU pay off in a cool way.
 

Kinyou

Member
So what's the range limit on Thor's ability to call Mjolnir? Whatever the script demands at the time?
It says he's on the other side of the universe, so maybe the hammer would take like a month to reach him?

The other option would be that it's locked away, like behind some magic forcefield or something.
 

xxracerxx

Don't worry, I'll vouch for them.
I assume Logan, Wonder Woman, and Justice League?

I have hope for all three of those, they just don't have the best track record (Logan by far looks like the standout of the three and WW looks potentially good as well). Nor does Spider-Man, but hopefully with Marvel being the creative force behind it, that will help.
 

SFenton

Member
I wouldn't look too much into this if I were you. That reads like Hollywood politics, and I have no doubt that Taika was involved greatly with the shooting script and the tone of the story, at least.

Yeah, pretty sure Disney has some high trust in this dude. He also, IIRC, was the most influential writer on early scripts of Moana, and drew heavily from his heritage?

Could be remembering that wrong. Know he was involved somehow.
 
I have hope for all three of those, they just don't have the best track record (Logan by far looks like the standout of the three and WW looks potentially good as well). Nor does Spider-Man, but hopefully with Marvel being the creative force behind it, that will help.

We already got a good enough look at Holland as spider man to know he'll be fine.

And Keaton as vulture is some A tier casting. If that film ends up as good as marvel's worst (IH) it will STILL be the second best Spiderman movie.
 

Litan

Member
Waititi did an AMA on Reddit where he answered some questions about Ragnarok.
You can expect a Taika-esque tone. They've been very accepting of my style.

Awesome. Thanks. I think TR will be one of the most adventurous and most "out there" of all the marvel movies. It's a crazy movie.

I made an effort to ignore the fact there are other Thor films.

Nope! (In answer to wether the bigger scale of the project affected how he directs).

You can. And more. (In answer to wether we can expect an 80s vibe from Ragnarok).

He doesn't seem too concerned about having his talent constricted.
 

xxracerxx

Don't worry, I'll vouch for them.
We already got a good enough look at Holland as spider man to know he'll be fine.

And Keaton as vulture is some A tier casting. If that film ends up as good as marvel's worst (IH) it will STILL be the second best Spiderman movie.

I am not that worried about the actors, just the story.

Right now here is how I would list my excitement for the films listed:

1. GotG2
2. Spider-Man/Thor
3. Logan
4. WW
.
.
.
8. Justice League.
 

caliph95

Member
3 of those movies I have zero faith in

I have hope for all of them except Justice League and some hope for Wonder Woman because it would be if it encourages more female Superheroes.

I am not that worried about the actors, just the story.

Right now here is how I would list my excitement for the films listed:

1. GotG2
2. Spider-Man/Thor
3. Logan
4. WW
.
.
.
8. Justice League.

Same for me
 
This year alone has:

Wonder Woman
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 2
Logan
Justice League
Spider-Man Homecoming

That's a lot of competition just to say that Thor 3 will win based on a 2 sentence synopsis.

And LEGO Batman coming in a few weeks. They are probably going to pull so many obscure references in that that Slayven's head will spin.
 

OldRoutes

Member
depending on how much input he has then he would be given credit no? isn't that generally the rule due to writers guild concerns and all that. just think it's bizarre that they hire such a comedic talent and then ask him to simply direct, he should be at least cowriter forreal.

Like I said, I wouldn't read too much into it. The directors job is to storyboard the movie, giving notes to writers, editing the movie, etc...

That being said, after all is said and done, maybe he'll end up with a more rewarding "Film by..." credit instead?
 

Pachimari

Member
I'm a bit wary about this one. I mean, Thor is one of my absolute favorite heroes in the MCU, but The Hunt for the Wilderspeople disappointed me slightly as I didn't find it as funny as I thought it would have been based on the trailer. And I want a dark serious movie from Thor: Ragnarok but it seems that changed into some 80s vibe humor since Waititi came on which could also be fine. I need to watch more of his movies to make a call on the director.
 

tomtom94

Member
Yeah, pretty sure Disney has some high trust in this dude. He also, IIRC, was the most influential writer on early scripts of Moana, and drew heavily from his heritage?

Could be remembering that wrong. Know he was involved somehow.

I think his draft of Moana was mostly rewritten, but he was involved in it. Which suggests Disney have a lot of faith. I'd be surprised if he doesn't get some kind of writing credit, honestly.
 

OldRoutes

Member
I'm a bit wary about this one. I mean, Thor is one of my absolute favorite heroes in the MCU, but The Hunt for the Wilderspeople disappointed me slightly as I didn't find it as funny as I thought it would have been based on the trailer. And I want a dark serious movie from Thor: Ragnarok but it seems that changed into some 80s vibe humor since Waititi came on which could also be fine. I need to watch more of his movies to make a call on the director.

Thor : Ragnarok most definitely won't be a dark serious movie. Better adjust your expectations already.
 
But people keep saying how open Marvel is
Once those Marvel checks clear, you could get these directors to say anything.
I'm hyped as hell for Beta Ray Bill.

He's showing up right? Right...

Right?
I hope Taika does something ludicrous like that hidden in his sleeve.

I'm really excited for this movie; Taika's enthusiasm, Mark Mothersbaugh from Devo doing the score, and a Marvel that seems to be more willing to make their villains memorable.
 

Not

Banned
This sounds so good.

Great director, great team-ups, exciting wrinkle (no hammer), cool setting

A worthy successor to Thor: The Dark World for sure
 

Pachimari

Member
Thor : Ragnarok most definitely won't be a dark serious movie. Better adjust your expectations already.
I did, but it doesn't change that that was what I was really looking forward to, with the whole Ragnarok event and Hela entering the picture. Now I just hope for some comedic cool gladiator battles.

I'm still more excited about this one, than I am Logan, Wonder Woman and Justice League though.
 
Waititi did an AMA on Reddit where he answered some questions about Ragnarok.

He doesn't seem too concerned about having his talent constricted.

I can belive it. While Marvel does obviously work in certain elements regardless of director, and seem to have an overarching control they do let directors put in some of their own flare. You can see James Gunn all over Guardians
 

Azazzel

Member
People seem to forget about an Iron Man film made by freaking Shane Black of all people when talking about the Marvel formula.
 
Waititi did an AMA on Reddit where he answered some questions about Ragnarok.

He doesn't seem too concerned about having his talent constricted.

Basically none of the MCU directors except Alan Taylor have expressed that concern. James Gunn in particular will be happy to tweet you all day about how he has complete creative control over Guardians.

Kevin Feige is a very busy man and probably has no interest in micromanaging all the movies he produces in a year. Especially now that Ike is out of the picture, he seems much more willing to just hire who he thinks are interesting people that will give a distinctive feel to each movie.

Unless they take 10 years to write a script.
 
I think it's interesting to see how some powers behind the scenes have changed to allow for a female villain. Both Iron Man 3 and Thor 2 were restricted from it four years ago.

I'm looking forward to what Taika does with it. Synopsis sounds cool as does the road trip talk. I just hope Loki isn't a major part of it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom