Complicity and collaboration are active words, they signify an action not a lack thereof, so this is quite confusing usage of these words and at the same time it makes it difficult to properly describe someone who, in my sense of the word, is complicit or collaborates, e.g. by distributing, advertising or protecting racist claims, racists or racist actions. Differentiating between those two things, I feel, is not irrelevant.
If it's not irrelevant you should probably learn what complicit actually means then. Example sentences from Oxford:
‘Scholars have become complicit, facilitators instead of critics and creators.'
‘In some way, we the fans were complicit in this failure because we consoled ourselves too easily.'
‘Search engines and advertisers have become complicit in the same self-delusion.'
‘However, their over-the-top rock cabaret works because the audience are hysterically complicit.'
‘Thanks to a coincidence of complexion, we are complicit and we will pay.'
‘Doping is very, very seldom accidental and almost always involves people complicit in the effort.'
‘And I watched every minute of it, aware that I was now complicit in the conspiracy.'
‘Landowners who are found to be complicit in the unauthorised dumping of waste may also be hauled before court.'
‘If I do not speak out against this nonchalant murder of innocents, I am complicit with my government.'
‘It doesn't help that they're aided and abetted by a complicit media.'
‘So they know that they were uncomfortably put in a position of being complicit in a cover-up.'
‘I felt complicit in the process which allowed this book to happen.'
‘Worse, we become complicit in extending suffering - not just our own, but that of others also.'
‘At the very least, he said, they were complicit in the victory of evil.'
‘The press, he adds, has been complicit in turning a blind eye to the government's record.'
‘But we, the final arbiters of what qualifies a photograph for immortality, are complicit in this.'
All of these examples are from a passive stance. When you know you're associated with something wrong and you do nothing you are complicit.
Contracts with NDAs are a thing. We don't know if its the case, but it would make sense.
You really think they have a contract with NDA that includes a full gag order for this minor voice roll and the other party espousing genetic purity doesn't in any way void that agreement?
The reality distortion needed to twist this into Gears for Breakfast as the victim here is outright insane.