• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

[RUMOR] Paul Thurrott: Xbox 720 is expensive: $500 or $300 for sub model, 5/21 Unveil

hahahahahaha, $500 - unless there's some phenomenal feature(s) that hasn't been revealed yet, no chance I'd spend that much, and if the always online is true then I won't be buying one anyway.


kinect is STILL over 100 dollars, isn't this thing only being sold with it included?

SMGDH Microsoft
 

Pikma

Banned
So... What if MS force you to be always online to play your games but if you don't have you XBL Gold you can't use that connection for shit other than that, haha, that would be hilarious.
 

RetroStu

Banned
Of just accept that gamerpoints mean fuck all and stopped having much meaning half way through the gen? There a gimmick. No one will care going next gen.

I lost my job last year so i have been watching a lot of playthroughs on Youtube due to the lack of money and pretty much all the youtubers i watch actively hunt out achievements and get all 'giddy' when the achievement icon pops up on screen.
 

Osiris

I permanently banned my 6 year old daughter from using the PS4 for mistakenly sending grief reports as it's too hard to watch or talk to her
I don't think you're getting what I'm saying.

With the rumors of it having set-top box functionality, you'll be able to get it through your cable provider subsidized, or pay the subsidized fee upfront for an expensive $500~ retail model.

So you think there will be a multi-tiered approach then?

Because that rumored set-top box functionality will have zero use outside the US.
 
I lost my job last year so i have been watching a lot of playthroughs on Youtube due to the lack of money and pretty much all the youtubers i watch actively hunt out achievements and get all 'giddy' when the achievement icon pops up on screen.

Do you join in with their delight?
 

DesertFox

Member
kinect is STILL over 100 dollars, isn't this thing only being sold with it included?

SMGDH Microsoft

I was given a Kinect and I don't use it. That's pretty bad when there's nothing compelling someone to use an item that was free. I think it's cool for tertiary commands, etc. but as a primary input method? No thanks...
 

Jarnet87

Member
It's gonna have Halo 5 at launch, all you complaining now will be praising Microsoft after E3. Halo mends all to braindead 8 year old Xbox gamers.
 

B.O.O.M

Member
So... What if MS force you to be always online to play your games but if you don't have you XBL Gold you can't use that connection for shit other than that, haha, that would be hilarious.

come on man don't give em any ideas

but I can see this happening
 

Orayn

Member
Actually the $450-$490 estimate includes assembly, power and cooling, but not shipping and packaging. Still, I can't see Sony making a large loss on their hardware like last-gen. $500 price in all likelihood.

That final figure includes everything but shipping and packaging. I edited in estimates for accessories and other costs afterwards.

Oops, misread a little, then. Thanks!

I can still see them putting it at $400-450 and selling at a slight loss. It would still be haven compared to the ~$200 losses they took on PS3.
 

Boss Man

Member
I think an interesting thing to consider for Sony is whether or not they end up putting that new PS Eye in the box. I think it's there mainly as a safety net against Kinect. If developers really focus on Kinect, a platform that has similar functionality optionally may be left out to dry.

At the same time, not including it could pull the price down.
 
I lost my job last year so i have been watching a lot of playthroughs on Youtube due to the lack of money and pretty much all the youtubers i watch actively hunt out achievements and get all 'giddy' when the achievement icon pops up on screen.

Not in my experience. Quite a lot just play and stop as they need to move onto the next game to show their audience.

Personally achievements might be one thing; and can be fun to accomplish, but the score itself is just arbitrary and means nothing. If someone goes to PS4 their gamescore doesn't change, its just not what their advertising.
 
So... What if MS force you to be always online to play your games but if you don't have you XBL Gold you can't use that connection for shit other than that, haha, that would be hilarious.

I mentioned this in another thread, it would be insane for them to force always-online DRM and then lock all online features behind a pay wall - I definitely think online multiplayer/netflix etc will be free on the Durango, they'll probably push a lot of freebies and value to counter the DRM negativity.
 

Yawnier

Banned
It's gonna have Halo 5 at launch, all you complaining now will be praising Microsoft after E3. Halo mends all to braindead 8 year old Xbox gamers.

I definitely wouldn't count on Halo 5 being there right at launch. I find it hard to believe that 343i could develop a mainline, full blown sequel to Halo 4 in only a years time.
 

BadAss2961

Member
Nextbox just sounds more and more awful with each new rumor.

If this one has any weight to it, prepare for MS to try to sneak in an XBL price increase with these new subscription models.
 

RetroStu

Banned
I was given a Kinect and I don't use it. That's pretty bad when there's nothing compelling someone to use an item that was free. I think it's cool for tertiary commands, etc. but as a primary input method? No thanks...

By an ex girlfriend with a grudge i guess?.
 
Things are looking worse and worse for MS. $500 or $300 with sub? If all this is true, they could be shooting themselves in the foot even more.

My console of choice this gen was 360 but I don't have or worry about allegiances so switching to Sony looks more like a reality if the rumors are true. All I care about at this point is the Halo franchise, which drew me in this gen. I'd hate to that series die should the Next Xbox fail miserably.

The Halo franchise isn't the same anyway now that Bungie is gone.
 

AOC83

Banned
So you don't have sales numbers? And you don't care how limited it's availability is at retail? And you don't care that it was a clear test? And you don't care that the model has been incredibly successful in other spaces?

I'm not sure how to have a rational conversation with you.

As i said we have the NPD numbers and they didn´t show a significant increase. The question was if customers would eat the prescribtion model up and so far we have absolutely no evidence that they do.
Don´t know whats so hard to get about this.
 

DesertFox

Member
I mentioned this in another thread, it would be insane for them to force always-online DRM and then lock all online features behind a pay wall - I definitely think online multiplayer/netflix etc will be free on the Durango, they'll probably push a lot of freebies and value to counter the DRM negativity.

Hmm, I don't know about that. MS has been charging for those features on XBL for 11 years. I don't think they would be so gracious as to suddenly remove that paywall.
 
I think an interesting thing to consider for Sony is whether or not they end up putting that new PS Eye in the box. I think it's there mainly as a safety net against Kinect. If developers really focus on Kinect, a platform that has similar functionality optionally may be left out to dry.

At the same time, not including it could pull the price down.

If Sony has an ounce of commonsense left (which they showed by hiring Cerny as system architect and using off-the-shelf parts that aren't over-engineered), then they would try to keep the price as low as possible.
 

JABEE

Member
I was talking about their new IP, the next AAA game by Epic, that will be exclusive for Durango. Fornite looks like a $10 downloadable game

What evidence is there of this? The only exclusive that Epic has done for Microsoft is Gears of War. Epic owns the Gears of War IP.

They have also put out UT exclusively on PS3 and PC and Bulletstorm came out on all platforms.

What evidence is there?
 

BadAss2961

Member
I definitely wouldn't count on Halo 5 being there right at launch. I find it hard to believe that 343i could develop a mainline, full blown sequel to Halo 4 in only a years time.
I wouldn't put it past Microsoft. I get the feeling they'd rush it out there just to have it available.
 

Partition

Banned
I for one find it absolutely absurd that they require you to be online at all times, yet if you want to use basic online features they want even more money.
 

RPGamer92

Banned
The subscription model isn't as much of an issue for me as the always-online feature is. I would probably get Live (after finding sweet deals first! ;) if I were more interested in buying Durango.
 

JABEE

Member
It's not that I don't believe that Epic could be making a new Gears of War game for the new Xbox, but I've read nothing about a new IP for Durango.
 

LCfiner

Member
radeon 7770 inside
8GB of DDR3
no BC
and 500$ price ?

something seems wrong here

well, also add the Kinect camera apparatus.

But, beyond that, MS might be trying to make a profit on hardware. Or they may push that $300 and Live subscription price real, real hard.
 

Bsigg12

Member
I don't think you're getting what I'm saying.

With the rumors of it having set-top box functionality, you'll be able to get it through your cable provider subsidized, or pay the subsidized fee upfront for an expensive $500~ retail model.

No i get entirely what you're saying. There is no reason why the subsidized model will not be available at retail. Right now for the subsidized 360 at $99 you get a 4gb system with a Kinect which retails at $299.99, so a $200 difference like this rumor is. Here, you pay $15 a month for 24 months.

If there is a set top box functionality you will have a further subsidized model because now you're paying for a more expensive service with the cable service and Live. That $15 a month could go up to $50 or more for Live plus cable.
 

Terrell

Member
Sony is basically being set up to win at this point if they don't screw it up.

You remember that you're talking about Sony, right?

indeed. Seems akin to buying a cell phone on contract vs unlocked. Normal consumers love their subsidies and will ignore/deal with consequences later.

That's going to be entirely dependent on a lot of things. Contracts in some reasons are not as loved as you would think. Canada in particular has a harsh distrust of them due to severe abuse of them from carriers the likes of which US cell phone owners have never seen. So if Canadians are going to take a contract model, they want to see that there's a value in it.

One also needs to remember that phones on subsidy make sense to cell phone consumers, as they are already REQUIRED to pay a monthly fee for the cell phone to work anyways. XBL's value proposition has degraded significantly since it was first introduced, and people may not (and likely will not) view a console as something that requires subscription and see it more for what it really is: a lease. And every consumer knows that when you take a lease, you're getting hosed on value every single time.
 

Yawnier

Banned
I wouldn't put it past Microsoft. I get the feeling they'd rush it out there just to have it available.

Still doubt it unless they very secretly have it being developed by a second developer. The only reason why Call of Duty is a yearly title is because 2 - 3 developers regularly work on it as of the present as they alternate with the yearly releases. 343 is the only developer working on Halo that we know of.

'Halo Quadrilogy' with updated graphics.

Something like this isn't that far-fetched though.
 
As i said we have the NPD numbers and they didn´t show a significant increase. The question was if customers would eat the prescribtion model up and so far we have absolutely no evidence that they do.
Don´t know whats so hard to get about this.

We Americans sure love our drugs.

We also love our SUBSCRIPTIONS when they save us a bundle up front.
 
Top Bottom