Maybe I've just become terribly cynical, but I find it impossible to swallow a 49gig install for a game that will be on current gen consoles and I know damn well wont require the same on my PS3.
Some people in this thread are mocking or laughing at the people who are going digital, but if the disk case has a 49GB min install required, then wouldn't the people going physical not really have any advantages in saving HDD space?
Some people in this thread are mocking or laughing at the people who are going digital, but if the disk case has a 49GB min install required, then wouldn't the people going physical not really have any advantages in saving HDD space?
Every PS4 and Xbone comes with a huge hard drive.
Doesn't 49GB just seem lazy? I'm sure there is SOME optimization that could be done.
Doesn't 49GB just seem lazy? I'm sure there is SOME optimization that could be done.
Launch title? Perhaps games will be smaller later on. Although lots of ps3 games were huge this gen so maybe not
Doesn't 49GB just seem lazy? I'm sure there is SOME optimization that could be done.
I don't think you know just how much next gen assets can weigh. Textures and audio alone are very, very big before they are compressed for the discs.
With any other game I would have agreed, but this is call of duty, game looks like shit, how's this 10GB bigger than KZ?
This and KZ consume almost 20% of the PS4 space, unless you're willing to upgrade the HDD a month or two later, how the hell will anyone afford to go digital with this craziness?!
Deleting and redownloading stuff. Just like PC. Or other digital only devices (phones/tablets).
You have to do this with every PS4 game.
Doesn't 49GB just seem lazy? I'm sure there is SOME optimization that could be done.
No blood perhaps? The violence in the Infinity Ward games was always tame compared to Treyarch's offerings.
Except on PC you can get 3TB HDD or set up RAID if you use multiple disks. The PS4 has no such ability so you will be deleting much more frequently.
I'm buying eight X1 games..... Ill be cleaning the fridge by Jan
Neither console supports external storage at launch though.
49GB, what the FUCK man.
Installing 49GBs of anything for a COD game just rubs me the wrong way. And to think some fools wanted digital only next gen...
I'm not sure what people were expecting. Current gem games were already getting towards about 14GB in size, and they have painfully low resolution textures. Raising texture resolution dramatically increases the size of a game. I was expecting no less than 35GB as the standard for the first year, and larger the further we get into the generation.There is absolutely no excuse for this taking up that much space. HD/next gen/whatever or otherwise -- that's completely unacceptable.
PS4 installs are the whole contents of the disk, similar to the way things are now on Xbox 360.
Unlike Xbox 360, the installs happen in the background automatically, and are presumably managed by the system to some degree, e.g. it'll probably delete the installs for games that you haven't played in a long time if you have less than a certain amount of free space.
Short of that, I'm sure you can manually delete install data or tell a game not to install more than the minimum amount needed, if there's a minimum at all.
Also, I think we would have heard by now if you were forced to install before you start playing. Cerny said that games would run off the disk, but dynamically install more and more data as needed until the disk was just in the drive for authentication purposes and everything could be read off the faster hard drive instead.
You got a point there!Still better than a 120$/120 game.
I'm not sure what people were expecting. Current gem games were already getting towards about 14GB in size, and they have painfully low resolution textures. Raising texture resolution dramatically increases the size of a game. I was expecting no less than 35GB as the standard for the first year, and larger the further we get into the generation.
I am curious to see if Xbox One games are going to be the same size, as I am not convinced textures will be of the same quality on that machine.
Its not the textures that are going to make a big issue. Its the uncompressed audio. If games do anything now that they have a ton of space, it'll be full audio with no compression. Games better sound great if they decide to do this shit.
Textures take up waaaaaay more space than audio. Videos can also take up quite a chunk of space, but lots of games currently stream that from disc. Not sure if it's really necessary to install those on ps4/xbo to be honest.
Wait, why are people freaking out over this? Just delete it when you are done with it.
So long game installs are separated from save data, I agree and don't see a huge problem. Is anyone really playing 8 different games at a given time? Now if my progress gets deleted when I delete the install data, then there is something to this.
Freaking out over nothing. Just clean up your hard drives you big babies. =)
At the rate some of you are going, you'll end up spending enough for a complete PC just in hard drives. =P
If I delete my MGS4 install, I don't loose my progress. That would just be stupid to tie one to the other.
Console gamers tend to have a hoarder mentality.
I guess I didn't find Cerny's statement as vague.
http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/191007/
page 3
Textures take up waaaaaay more space than audio. Videos can also take up quite a chunk of space, but lots of games currently stream that from disc. Not sure if it's really necessary to install those on ps4/xbo to be honest.