Glorified G
Member
I can't forget him suggesting Sony wasn't being completely truthful after they confirmed they won't add any new DRM.
lol, forgot about that one. I don't get how people here crap on Arthur Gies and give Sessler get a pass.
I can't forget him suggesting Sony wasn't being completely truthful after they confirmed they won't add any new DRM.
Sessler is really a joke these days. A significant difference in power and 100 dollar cheaper pricetag is obviously a selling point.
I will watch and evaluate this entire video:
*sigh*
He blames the industry for this controversy, saying it's their fault for pushing the 1080p standard. As if gamers weren't already well aware of the benefit, and wouldn't want that shit all of their own.
Talks about it being a "McGuffin", goes on to say he sometimes can't even tell the difference (classic game journalist deflection). Goes on a tangent about it being about game design, not visuals - another false choice game journalists love to bandy about - and consistent misunderstanding of why this is an issue altogether.
Let me help you, Adam Sessler ->
1. You keep going on and on about how "it's still game design." Guess what? It's still game design at 1080p too. One does not need to make a choice. Your game design is not damaged because you aim for a factually superior resolution standard. I
2. Saying you can't see differences in resolution is not something someone in your position should be proud of. Your job is to inform consumers, not attempt to obfuscate the problems and attempt to minimize their impact. Your job is not to run damage control. It's to state the facts. Yes, 720p -> 1080p is a big difference. Yes, it is quite easily noticeable. Yes, it indicates a gap in power of XBO/PS4, and that has an impact on potential game design scenarios too (power is not just visuals). It's all connected.
3. Resolution is also important for gaming: the added clarity helps in game design.
4. Gamers already knew the importance of 1080p over 720p. The industry didn't need to "push" the standard for this to be the case. We already knew it, we already wanted it. We had a whole gen of games barely at 720p, often below that, and you want us to be satisfied with that shit for another gen? At $400-$500 for new hardware? I can only say "fuck off" with that settling shit. We should expect more and demand more.
5. Journalists, please stop offering false choices to gamers. It's not VISUALS or GAMEPLAY. It's not GOOD ONLINE or FREE ONLINE. These are false choices. They do not exist on a spectrum that requires anyone to select either option. You can have both.
Andrea Rene is one fine woman.
I think he's all over the place in this video, and he's neither incorrect nor insightful with any particular comment. Agreed, gameplay is important. Agreed, I want games to look interesting from an art perspective as well. No, IQ is not marketing and I don't want great IQ because that has been marketed to me-- it is important as this is a visual medium and graphics are a key part of the user experience. No, discussing resolution and how games look does not take away from people discussing the games and the gameplay itself (those games are not out yet so please let us know what you would like to discuss and we will do so).
This is really so perplexing to me. A very simple discussion was happening in the enthusiast community and the reaction to it has just been to treat it like an anathema; like technology is not or has not been something critical to our hobby for 30 years.
Just deal with it.
He's not wrong. If a game looks and runs great, who cares? Problem I had with that video is that it was the equivalent of iceberg lettuce. It was nothing of substance or value.
But. The games!
Also where joo gonna get halo and shiz bro?
It's not like you can get halo in 1080 on ps4
I agree with him. Resolution is just not that big of a deal to me.
I usually take up for the guy, but when he avoid saying "native 720p"
...
... wow.
If you want to argue for the guy, try better than this.
The games media created this. They framed it as a big deal when Madden was 30 FPS less on PS3, when Bayonetta ran at a lower resolution, when Fallout looked worse, when Red Dead Redemption had less foliage. Places like Eurogamer made their name pointing these issues out and framing them as a point of legitimate discussionGotta Lmao at the mantra being that every outlet that doesn't blow this up to the degree that "we" feel it needs to be are being paid off by MS. Maybe, just maybe, it really ain't as big a deal as "we" think it is.
I agree with him. Resolution is just not that big of a deal to me.
Gotta Lmao at the mantra being that every outlet that doesn't blow this up to the degree that "we" feel it needs to be are being paid off by MS. Maybe, just maybe, it really ain't as big a deal as "we" think it is.
Really? Because i think he's one of the few competent people out there.
But it's a moot point to argue with the hive mind of GAF because once a hate train starts there is no stopping.
I cringed that that too. Native 1080p vs "upresed 1080p"
So much this...
This conspiracy nonsense is so absurd.
He's editorializing. Patrick Klepeck and Brad from GB said the same thing. Opinions.
Sites like DF will bear out the hard comparisons-cuz, well that's their job. If there are stark differences you'll see that in reviews.
Patrick spoke on this- he mentioned that all the developers he spoke with think the gap will narrow, and the differences won't be huge. I agree with his wait and see stance- report on the differences still tho.But do you concede that a console running 1080p games now could drop down to 720p later with a big increase in framerate/ai/gameplay elements? Similarly a console already at 720p could not do the same?
That is a simplified view of the current situation due to launch issues and everything else, but it is still a significant point of discussion at this stage of the game and you would think not one to be so continuously glossed over.
If you add the ps camera, ps plus subscription and forget about xbox live, there is price parity between ps4-xbox one.
Sessler is one of the biggest jokes in gaming journalism and I'm baffled how anyone takes him seriously.
The difference is that 100% of the games that matter on nintendo platforms are built for the nintendo platforms. Parity has not been a big deal for nintendo for the majority of the last decade.Nintendo threads. Am I right?
I really don't think they will, not for this.I like Adam and I agree with some of his points.
Everyone is pushing 1080p/60fps as the Next-Gen standard.
The problem is that the XB1 can't make that mark comfortably, while the PS4 can.
The problem is that the PS4 is $100 cheaper than the XB1.
The PROBLEM is that Microsoft misjudged the importance of the native 1080p/60fps unwritten standard that gamers were expecting. MS thought 720p upscaled would suffice.
MS was wrong. MS will suffer.
32MB of eSRAM cached to 8GB of DDR3 RAM is a bottleneck.
MS was wrong. MS will suffer.
lol, forgot about that one. I don't get how people here crap on Arthur Gies and give Sessler get a pass.
I agree with him. Resolution is just not that big of a deal to me.
After May 21st, I really have no problem using that dollar sign on their behalf.You should use more dollar signs to really get your point across. smh
Soooo you think there's an industry wide conspiracy to make the Bone look better than it is?I'm not so sure anymore.
I guess if you pretend the 360/PS3 Generation never happened...
That's the crux of the argument, isn't it?
The difference isn't worth talking about whatsoever, it's that inconsequential = crazy talk
The difference and the price make the PS4 the much better option = reasonable
The difference in price and power exist but I prefer the upcoming games on the Xbox One = reasonable
The difference and the price make the PS4 the only choice and you are crazy and doing every gamer a disservice by accepting lower power at a higher price = crazy talk
I've never understood this particular point. Even as a lurker, I disagreed with tons of Gaffers and yet agreed with dozens of others. I always felt that NeoGAF users were free to think whatever they wanted
Very good summary. Crazy talk= hits though... unfortunately.That's the crux of the argument, isn't it?
The difference isn't worth talking about whatsoever, it's that inconsequential = crazy talk
The difference and the price make the PS4 the much better option = reasonable
The difference in price and power exist but I prefer the upcoming games on the Xbox One = reasonable
The difference and the price make the PS4 the only choice and you are crazy and doing every gamer a disservice by accepting lower power at a higher price = crazy talk
Soooo you think there's an industry wide conspiracy to make the Bone look better than it is?
Why would their be? I think you're seeing things that aren't there man, tbh.Conspiracy indicates an organized action of multiple parties.
So no.
A xbox bias in media?
Yes.
Really you guys are jumping on Sessler now. What he said is 100 percent right. It's nice to have 1080p, but how much does it really matter.
I wonder when people are going to realize that this is not why gamers are talking about this issue. It's completely beside the point and another discussion entirely.
Patrick spoke on this- he mentioned that all the developers he spoke with think the gap will narrow, and the differences won't be huge. I agree with his wait and see stance- report on the differences still tho.