Sub_Level
wants to fuck an Asian grill.
Schattenjäger;105752522 said:If this was happening while T2 was the last movie - id be so mad
But T3 and T4 happened already so I have absolutely no problem with this movie
Bring it on !
Exactly
Schattenjäger;105752522 said:If this was happening while T2 was the last movie - id be so mad
But T3 and T4 happened already so I have absolutely no problem with this movie
Bring it on !
Is this the one where he goes back and prevents Gabriel from leaving the band?
HahahahaIs this the one where the Terminator gets Alzheimer's and asks everyone 'where's John Connor?' the whole film?
I feel like the story everybody wants to see is... like, the story of the man they modeled the T-800 after. It's kind of the obvious thing to do.
So I'm really confused as to why they're making a movie about a killer robot getting old instead of that.
I feel like the story everybody wants to see is... like, the story of the man they modeled the T-800 after. It's kind of the obvious thing to do.
So I'm really confused as to why they're making a movie about a killer robot getting old instead of that.
whats this about rights reverting to Cameron?
Wait, J.K. Simmons?
I liked Terminator: Sega CD more
First I've heard of Skynet's living tissue aging. It was never quoted as being "human flesh" before.
I wish they would just do a proper one like T1 and T2, and leave Arnie out of it. He's the original and best, but he can't do it any more.
Dr. Silberman: Okay, okay. But this cyborg, if it's metal...
Kyle Reese: Surrounded by living tissue!
So the T-850 was the aged model in T3 and now we have a T-800 that can age. Meh, whatever.
Looks like this is going to be a Star Trek style reboot-sequel. Still in-universe with the originals, but with a changed timeline.
I guess I'm okay with that. It makes enough sense with the internal logic of the franchise. T4 set a precedent for it as well, with all the time travel hijinks in that timeline culminating in the early creation of the T-800.
The timeline can be changed and has probably already gone through a few loops before the first movie ever began. We never even saw the original timeline in the first place. And here a new loop begins again.
I'm not too upset about the old-Terminator reasoning, either. The original concept of the terminator was to be an older man to highlight the fact that the skin is just a covering and what is underneath is powerful and scary. This is just sort of reusing an old Cameron concept.
As for seeing the terminator both young and old, how cool would it be if the same terminator fought itself? Old Future Terminator vs Young Past Terminator, the exact same one at different times. That would be crazy. Maybe they could form a paradox by having the future T be the one that subdues the past T for reprogramming.
I feel like the story everybody wants to see is... like, the story of the man they modeled the T-800 after. It's kind of the obvious thing to do.
So I'm really confused as to why they're making a movie about a killer robot getting old instead of that.
Damn it, NO! NOOO! Don't give up a Star Wars movie for this! Your career!
Then again, either one could be a bad move.
I feel like the story everybody wants to see is... like, the story of the man they modeled the T-800 after. It's kind of the obvious thing to do.
So I'm really confused as to why they're making a movie about a killer robot getting old instead of that.
No, the story people want to see is the first 10 minutes of T2 stretched out into a trilogy. The future war, complete with mountains of human skulls, etc, and robot skeletons marching like zombies over a nightmarish nuclear hellscape battlefield.
Well, it's called Genesis, it's the first in a trilogy, and Arnold says there's a young version of him, so I assumed that's probably what we're going to see for at least part of this movie.I feel like the story everybody wants to see is... like, the story of the man they modeled the T-800 after. It's kind of the obvious thing to do.
So I'm really confused as to why they're making a movie about a killer robot getting old instead of that.
I still maintain my theory that the original John Connor was NOT fathered by Kyle Reese, everything Terminator 1 and on fucked the timelines up, Back to the Future style.
Random Terminator related thought.
In Terminator 2, the moment Sarah and John figure out that Skynet was made through the technology of the Terminator from the original movie, that John should instantly let himself die.
John dying means no John leading the resistance. No John leading the resistance means Skynet sends no Terminator back through time to kill Sarah. No Terminator back through time means Skynet doesn't get created.
Why am I even bothering trying to figure out Terminator time travel
Worst Terminator movie IMO, between the bland action, most boring characters, and lack of direction until the last 30 minutes, it was a complete mess, I'm hoping this new one is actually good.Terminator Salvation
I liked t3 more than t2.
Sue me
perfect GIF
I feel like the story everybody wants to see is... like, the story of the man they modeled the T-800 after. It's kind of the obvious thing to do.
So I'm really confused as to why they're making a movie about a killer robot getting old instead of that.
Is this the one where the Terminator gets Alzheimer's and asks everyone 'where's John Connor?' the whole film?
Based on Terminator: Salvation, I hope this new movie has a TERRIBLE trailer.
Because Salvation had a really great trailer and ended up being shit.