NullPointer said:I admit I'm not up to date on all the reasons for PS3 installs or why some games do or don't need them. But with all that unique data, who knows?
The maximum as mandated by the TRC is 5 gigabytes.
This is a fact.
NullPointer said:I admit I'm not up to date on all the reasons for PS3 installs or why some games do or don't need them. But with all that unique data, who knows?
EmCeeGramr said:I don't think Doom 3 is that bad either. The flashlight thing is dumb, and the game really gets boring in the final parts, but it's a good, if not "Doom good", shooter.
Chiggs said:I think Doom 3 and Resurrection of Evil are really good shooters. In fact, I'm going through them now on some sort of id binge.
DrPirate said:The maximum as mandated by the TRC is 5 gigabytes.
This is a fact.
NullPointer said:So, whats that? A 20Gig full install on the 360?
I didn't know shadows took that much space.
The funny thing is I felt the exact same way about sackboys. :lol DEVIL DOLLSBobTheFork said:OK, so I'm just starting to check the game out now and it looks great. I can't wait to see how it turns out on ps3. I didn't even know I was missing out on this : ) I need to keep up. Now if I just knew where the creepy, voo-doo doll avatars came from.
NullPointer said:It'd be a damn good time for Doom 3 to be available on Xbox classics as a download title.
I'd dip in again if the game played correctly.
Facts have changed quite a bit this gen. Not that I have any reason to assume a mandatory install. Just saying it wouldn't surprise me.
Chiggs said:I think Doom 3 and Resurrection of Evil are really good shooters. In fact, I'm going through them now on some sort of id binge.
permutated said:If you mind switching disks you're a lazy fuck.
So long as the disks are properly storable there's no reason to complain.
RE4 Gamecube (2 disks) >>>>>> RE4 PS2 (1 disk)
Zen said:I see what you did there, very sly :lol
Awntawn said:Wonder what he means when he says the PS3 is more difficult to work with, but gives them more headroom. Hopefully "more headroom" isn't technical lingo for "less AA and lower resolution textures" like it does for a lot of multiplatform devs ;/
Fakto said:When are they gonna consider release "big games" like this one in Blue Ray for PC ? A bunch of people already have the hardware.
I'd rather they didn't.Fakto said:When are they gonna consider release "big games" like this one in Blue Ray for PC ? A bunch of people already have the hardware.
TheHeretic said:Whats the point? You just install the game anyway.
THIS! He is taking a break from touring/nineinchnails for now. They better be all over him for Doom!_tetsuo_ said:Summon Reznor. He has work to do.
I... wow. So you are comparing the BEST gamecube title with a lackluster port? Awesome!permutated said:If you mind switching disks you're a lazy fuck.
So long as the disks are properly storable there's no reason to complain.
RE4 Gamecube (2 disks) >>>>>> RE4 PS2 (1 disk)
TheHeretic said:Whats the point? You just install the game anyway.
If anyone's got a shot, it's id Tech 5.Dark FaZe said:So is this expected to eclipse Crysis graphically?
Fakto said:For a person that "installed" games from a 3½ floppy this statement makes no sense.
Even if it's just practical for costumers, companies should be all over the Blue-rays for his low piracy rate.
bj00rn_ said:WAT??
Fakto said:When are they gonna consider release "big games" like this one in Blue Ray for PC ? A bunch of people already have the hardware.
permutated said:So long as the disks are properly storable there's no reason to complain.
RE4 Gamecube (2 disks) >>>>>> RE4 PS2 (1 disk)
hteng said:dead space was much better than doom 3
Fakto said:Even if it's just practical for costumers, companies should be all over the Blue-rays for his low piracy rate.
Didn't they end up breaking Rage into sections due to the X360 version? There was a big hoopla here on GAF I remember vaguely.Sho_Nuff82 said:So Doom 4 is confirmed for PS3/360/PC, and unlike Rage the game is completely linear, so Carmack isn't against breaking it up into smaller pieces.
NullPointer said:So, whats that? A 20Gig full install on the 360?
Wollan said:Didn't they end up breaking Rage into sections due to the X360 version? There was a big hoopla here on GAF I remember vaguely.
Vorador said:No, if i remember well they had to downgrade the textures on the 360 version to make it fit into one disc.
Yeah, but I didn't put 0% because it's too "definitive", maybe there are ISOs of Blue-Ray movies already, I don't know.Philanthropist said:Low? The PS3's piracy rate is 0%, which is unheard of since the cartridge era, and even then there were pirated cartridges. The funny thing is that nobody ever gives credit for that.
shagg_187 said:THIS! He is taking a break from touring/nineinchnails for now. They better be all over him for Doom!
Of course there are pirated versions of BluRay movies. Anything that's playable on a PC will be pirated no matter what. We're talking about games here, though. And you cannot pirate PS3 games.Fakto said:Yeah, but I didn't put 0% because it's too "definitive", maybe there are ISOs of Blue-Ray movies already, I don't know.
It surprises how EA is putting so much effort in new [and friking annoying] ways to stop piracy but didn't aproach it with a Blue Ray version.
Septimus said:Of course there are pirated versions of BluRay movies. Anything that's playable on a PC will be pirated no matter what. We're talking about games here, though. And you cannot pirate PS3 games.
DD will be completely dominant on the platform before Blu Ray even has a chance to maybe become mainstream.KHarvey16 said:It'll be years before PC games on Bluray are anything but a huge waste of money for a publisher.
Pretty much. There's practically no market for it (and it's looking likely there may never be a substantial one), apart from some Blu-ray drive manufacturer paying for a special edition of a game to be packed in with the new drives, anyway. PC is rapidly heading toward DD as the most secure, more economical means of distribution. It helps that DD is gaining in popularity and common use faster than Blu-ray drive adoption could ever hope to see.KHarvey16 said:It'll be years before PC games on Bluray are anything but a huge waste of money for a publisher.
yeah right. DD sucks. Cheaper prices and physical copies allowing you to sell > downloaded stuff.MightyHedgehog said:Pretty much. There's practically no market for it (and it's looking likely there may never be a substantial one), apart from some Blu-ray drive manufacturer paying for a special edition of a game to be packed in with the new drives, anyway. PC is rapidly heading toward DD as the most secure, more economical means of distribution. It helps that DD is gaining in popularity and common use faster than Blu-ray drive adoption could ever hope to see.
I wasn't talking about what might be more advantageous in all ways, in all situations for the consumer. DD is simply less expensive for the publisher.-viper- said:yeah right.
-viper- said:yeah right. DD sucks. Cheaper prices and physical copies allowing you to sell > downloaded stuff.
Fakto said:For a person that "installed" games from a 3½ floppy this statement makes no sense.
Even if it's just practical for costumers, companies should be all over the Blue-rays for his low piracy rate.
Visualante said:Would love to know the ball park on PC specs. I'm guessing a quad core will be recommended.
Steam's servers are going to love this game. They're going to have to offer a pre-load if it's more than 20gb.
Truant said:Something tells me the 360 version will look better, so I can handle some disk swapping.
Given that he mentioned that before compression some of the texture bases are upwards to 300GB I guess they do.markot said:>_<
Do they even try to compress stuff >.>?