Yep. A lot of the core mission stuff was great.Besides the shit ending and awful sidequests, everything else in ME3 was excellent to me, it was by no means a bad game.
Besides the shit ending and awful sidequests, everything else in ME3 was excellent to me, it was by no means a bad game.
Oh by sidequests I meant the ones that pop up in your journal by listening to random conversations in the Citadel. All the fetch quests basically, scanning a planning for an artifact and bringing it back to the NPC. They felt like bad filler. The character sidequests were fantasticI even liked the ending and only remembered the poor sidequests when someone called me out on liking the side content. I only remembered stuff like the missions with Jack and Grunt showing up, which felt like full fledged story missions even though they were optional. Those were great.
My one major complaint with ME3 was how few dialogue options there were. Conversations felt more like watching cutscenes than being an active participant.
I'm playing DA2 now and I'm enjoying it. It's a huge step down from Origins for sure and clearly rushed but going in with managed expectations has helped a lot. DAI seems like it was designed and delayed specifically to respond to criticisms of DA2 and ME3 so I have high hopes.
Somehow I'm going to invade your game and slay your dragons.I felt really sorry for that dragon =(
Definitely picking this up, but man, I'm going to try and protect dragons. They're an endangered species! And listen to him! He's crying when his legs get taken out!
:'(
I felt really sorry for that dragon =(
Definitely picking this up, but man, I'm going to try and protect dragons. They're an endangered species! And listen to him! He's crying when his legs get taken out!
:'(
Besides the shit ending and awful sidequests, everything else in ME3 was excellent to me, it was by no means a bad game.
Any species that attacks me on sight becomes endangered!
Let see, what part for the well produced game did the ps3 version fall under? what about the fact that you needed mods to fix basic stuff on the PC version? So my fellow gaffer, what does well received mean for an obviously broken game?
all skyrim manage to show is that reviewers are either extremely incompetent or they get paid by bethshit to ignore major problems. It's funny if those problems were from any other company players like yourself would complain so loud even the gods would hear.
Is it bad that I liked the ending I got? I liked ME 3 more than I thought I would.
Hi Derrek!
I really enjoyed ME3 as well, though I had the bar set rather after having a year of people on the internet whining that the ending was literally Hitler.
Hi Derrek!
I really enjoyed ME3 as well, though I had the bar set rather after having a year of people on the internet whining that the ending was literally Hitler.
Besides the shit ending and awful sidequests, everything else in ME3 was excellent to me, it was by no means a bad game.
That's actually the best way to go into DA2 I think. Now that the game has been around for a few years and people have dog-piled it, go in knowing it won't be as good as DA:O. Go in knowing there will be some things that will be patently obvious that the game was rushed out the door.
You will end up enjoying the game for what it does well than getting hung up on "THIS ISNT DA:O!!!!"
[...] people on the internet whining that the ending was literally Hitler.
Just explaining because your first line said you didn't understand
My opinion is as yours. The studio can put out a good game if left to their own devices without too much EA interferance. That's what I'm hoping for here. I hope I don't get burned. Otherwise, DA:O was phenomenal and I still enjoyed DA2. The game was incredibly flawed and was absolutely rushed out the door but it had plenty of redeeming qualities.
Can we expect a high quality download of the gameplay series videos?!
Gamersyde save us!
I asked pages ago, no one's telling
I recommend you not to preorder. Wait scores and see it is like origins or da2. Then you decide. Or you might be dissatisfied.
Remember 'eaware' and be open-eyed. You don't want to lose your money to insatiable company.
If I can romance Iron Bull, though, I'll totally get it. :x
I recommend you not to preorder. Wait scores and see it is like origins or da2. Then you decide. Or you might be dissatisfied..
Dragon Age has a metacritic of 91, while DA 2 has a metacritic of 83. Both are majority positive, DA2 has a bit of so-so scores, nothing blasting the game. Compare the user score of 4.3 Normally I'm not a "b-b-b-but, Metacritic!" guy, but that means something.
I thought DA2 was a game with real heart, but it ain't within a point of Origins, not on its best day sir. Reviews are not very trustworthy.
It actually has a 79: http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/dragon-age-ii
(version with more reviews)
Also, user reviews mean shit. I assure you that some boards out there already decided to bomb Inquisition with 1.
So did ubisoft with Watchdogs.
Not interested in what the game looks like on dual titans...
Dragon Age has a metacritic of 91, while DA 2 has a metacritic of 83. Both are majority positive, DA2 has a bit of so-so scores, nothing blasting the game. Compare the user score of 4.3 Normally I'm not a "b-b-b-but, Metacritic!" guy, but that means something.
I thought DA2 was a game with real heart, but it ain't within a point of Origins, not on its best day sir. Reviews are not very trustworthy.
yeah I know it is probably wishful thinking but the whole team combat programming mode was so cool and really made combat super interesting to micro-manage the tactics.
I want this all to return
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sM4cFwGQBno
but fear that because it detracts from the "ease of accessibility" they would never allow it.
I felt really sorry for that dragon =(
Definitely picking this up, but man, I'm going to try and protect dragons. They're an endangered species! And listen to him! He's crying when his legs get taken out!
:'(
User reviews are not very indicative either, since they are not checked for objectivity. Fans mouth-frothingly gave DmC bad score overall, citing issues like hair and many obviously not played it. To make any sense of user reviews, you have to take into account their aggregate agendas and expectations/relationships stemming from the game's legacy.On the issue of user scores, sure there are tons of 0's, 1's and 2's the game clearly does not deserve, as it is entirely functional in what it does. However, I feel it is pretty clear that the majority of people who went into DA2 came out of it feeling quite sour, and the view of the game by RPG fans is overall negative, whereas DAO was overall positive. Reviews for the titles however were pretty much the same "This is good, but not quite as good as Origins". A real difference in reception that is noteworthy.
Definitely day one, but cautiously optimistic after DA 2...please Bioware, don't let me down...
I'm playing DA2 right now and, while I'm enjoying it, I fully understand the hate. It feels more like a spin off side story than a sequel and it's pretty unpolished. It's not a bad game but it is a poor RPG.
I asked pages ago, no one's telling
Why?Would it kill you to wait a couple of days before buying it to wait for some peer reviews?