Doug Heffernan
Member
Good! Now stop casting the same damn people in your movies. You're not Martin Scorsese, get over yourself.
Confidence got nothing to do with it. Think it's you who has the problem in getting past that to read great critiques.
Indeed, unless if that person only follows big studio films.
No? Did it get bad reviews?
What meltdowns to The Revenant reviews? It's 84% and 8/10 average on RT after 43 reviews, that's great.
Indeed, unless if that person only follows big studio films.
...which could just easily be titled American Hustle 2
I've seen 52 movies released in 2015 this year, none of them being comic book movies and few being summer blockbusters (a couple are 2014 holdouts that didn't technically release in my city until January 2015, and some foreign releases for similar reasons), and I've given them personal ratings as follow:
1-star rating : 3 movies
2-star rating : 10 movies
3-star rating : 22 movies
4-star rating : 10 movies
5-star rating : 7 movies
That ranks as a pretty mediocre year for movies for me. And, I found it "strange" because some of the best movies of the year have been big studio affairs, like Creed and Mad Max and Inside Out, where that usually isn't the case, and some talented directors have had some big misfires like Pan, Spectre, Jobs, maybe Joy, maybe The Reverent, and so on.
There's a lot I haven't seen this year that I wanted to because the release dates didn't line up with my schedule, like The Assassin playing for only 1 week where I live, or things I need to catch up on like Clouds of Sils Maria and Chiraq and While We're Young and so on. Either way, this year has just felt very mediocre, or average. And, to be fair, I think most years are around the "average" mark, with some years being really great and other years being really weak. I guess I try not to inflate things because if every year is great, then what was 2008? Or 2011? Or 2002? 1997? And so on.
Maybe you judge movies too hardI've seen 52 movies released in 2015 this year, none of them being comic book movies and few being summer blockbusters (a couple are 2014 holdouts that didn't technically release in my city until January 2015, and some foreign releases for similar reasons), and I've given them personal ratings as follow:
1-star rating : 3 movies
2-star rating : 10 movies
3-star rating : 22 movies
4-star rating : 10 movies
5-star rating : 7 movies
That ranks as a pretty mediocre year for movies for me. And, I found it "strange" because some of the best movies of the year have been big studio affairs, like Creed and Mad Max and Inside Out, where that usually isn't the case, and some talented directors have had some big misfires like Pan, Spectre, Jobs, maybe Joy, maybe The Reverent, and so on.
There's a lot I haven't seen this year that I wanted to because the release dates didn't line up with my schedule, like The Assassin playing for only 1 week where I live, or things I need to catch up on like Clouds of Sils Maria and Chiraq and While We're Young and so on. Either way, this year has just felt very mediocre, or average. And, to be fair, I think most years are around the "average" mark, with some years being really great and other years being really weak. I guess I try not to inflate things because if every year is great, then what was 2008? Or 2011? Or 2002? 1997? And so on.
Even if the Academy ignores it, Mad Max is a shoe-in to win GAF's movie of the year awards (unless I'm grossly underestimating how rabid Star Wars are).Mad Max is definitely a contender for film of the year.
Interesting. I don't compare years, but fair enough.
Did you happen to see:
A Pigeon Sat On A Branch, The Lobster, Hard To Be A God, Ex Machina, Mistress America, Duke Of Burgundy, It Follows, Theeb, Timbuktu, 45 Years, Carol, World Of Tomorrow (only 15 min but better than many sci fi films), Slow West, Macbeth, Girlhood, Diary Of A Teenage Girl, The Wonders, Amy, Cartel Land, Taxi Tehran, The Look Of Silence?
I'm counting out festival films, ten or so I saw.
Cause those are my favourites from this year.
Maybe you judge movies too hard
Some of those, yes. I enjoyed Ex Machina, Mistress America (minus about 10 minutes of the film that I REALLY hated), It Follows, Timbuktu, Girlhood, Amy, Cartel Land, and The Look of Silence. Gathering from critical consensus, I'm much more lukewarm on Amy and The Look of Silence (especially compared to Oppenheimer's previous). Out of that list, I really liked Mistress America except for 10 minutes nearish the end, and Ex Machina was good, but I don't think it is amazing or anything revelatory.
And, I am big on Everest and The Stanford Prison Experiment, but I feel alone on these movies. Same with Welcome To Me, which is one of my 5-star movies that I know I'm really alone on loving.
Carol isn't playing for me yet, and I hope the only damn art theater near me reopens soon with it playing because that film has been my most anticipated since Cannes. A great director and my favorite actress, I can't wait.
A couple of the ones you listed I don't know what is up with them. The Lobster still hasn't played near me despite there being a famous enough cast to get at least a weekend in my art house cinema, and Macbeth should have played a month ago, but still hasn't (though brief things I've heard about it have lowered my expectations, mainly the sidelining of Lady Macbeth). It's frustrating waiting to see what appears in that one theater of mine and what gets a VOD release. Thank goodness for iTunes so I could see I Smile Back because that was never going to come to a theater near me, and it didn't. But, they've played By The Sea for three weeks for some reason. I dunno. I wish I lived in NYC or LA just for movies.
I had no idea that this existed.
I just don't get the shtick. It's not like he writes in Hulk's broken English, he just types in all caps. What's the point?
You don't need to know anything about typography cause it's not a poster or logo, it's a critique. If you haven't gotten over the style to actually engage with the content after 5 years when everyone's already made their mind up to read/not read, then why protest now?Yeah. If you know anything about typography, you'll know that it objectively makes something harder to read. There's literally no reason to do it - it's just a gimmick that makes it more difficult to get through the prose. Why do that?
Yeah. If you know anything about typography, you'll know that it objectively makes something harder to read. There's literally no reason to do it - it's just a gimmick that makes it more difficult to get through the prose. Why do that?
You don't need to know anything about typography cause it's not a poster or logo, it's a critique. If you haven't gotten over the style to actually engage with the content after 5 years when everyone's already made their mind up to read/not read, then why protest now?
Maybe to weed out the people who are so uninterested in the best film critic on the internet that they refuse to read something for one of the most trivial reasons imaginable.
You can't possibly actually believe thisMaybe to weed out the people who are so uninterested in the best film critic on the internet that they refuse to read something for one of the most trivial reasons imaginable.
Mad Max is actually in that race, amazingly.
Just caught this and enjoyed it well enough. O'Russell gets too much shit.
Sure, back when he was making awesome stuff like Huckabees he would have been the last person you would expect to become a routine, packaged crowd-pleaser director. But fuck it. These harmless (if sometimes toothless) crowdpleasers are still better and more enjoyable than 90% of the other packaged popcorn filmsthat fail to elicit so much as a smirk most of the time.
I gotta judge the film as the film it is, not the film it isn't for what the filmmaker used to be. And this film ain't bad y'all. Worth a watch. Fun but nothing mind blowing. And sometimes that's enough.