No, I asked if you're dumb.
I never said it referred to resolution, I made a very specific point of what can be interpreted as technical, go back and read the thread more carefully.
My reply to you was specifically about this subsection not just talking about "content", which is factually doesn't.
No it doesn't, that's why it's defined in a legal document, because if they don't define it it creates a loophole like you are trying to create now.
This is why I asked if you are just dumb.
Publisher will not (i) release the Game or any DLC on any Competitive Platform or PC/Mobile Platform on an exclusive basis, or (ii) offer any additional content or any additional features or benefits to the end users of the Game on any competitive Platform or PC/Mobile Platforms on an exclusive basis'
What if sony is also buying review scores and makes gamepass games to be 70s on Metacritic?
Here’s the parity part:
It says “content, feature and technical parity”. Some people want to ignore the bolded part for some reason.It actually says content parity since there is no platform limitation.
Not what the dumb Twitter tries to say.
So where does it say about resolution and fps below that part? It doesn't from what I can see. It mentions features and DLC. PC going to be stuck with console res, fps and settings, can't wait to see it.It says “content, feature and technical parity”. Some people want to ignore the bolded part for some reason.
HoegLaw is a YouTube channel that produces videos about legal matters in the video game industry.Also, that Twitter account? don't make me laugh.
Keep reading lolIt says “content, feature and technical parity”. Some people want to ignore the bolded part for some reason.
You're ignoring every other explanation what technical parity is likely referring to.It says “content, feature and technical parity”. Some people want to ignore the bolded part for some reason.
You're ignoring every other explanation what technical parity is likely referring to.
I thought someone was knocking on my door, turns out it was timdog's massive boner hitting the side of my house.
There have been PC ports of console games in the past that have had locked frame rates or settings that were “fixed” with a fan patch.They can’t answer the PC parity cause then the narrative would fall apart.
HoegLaw is a YouTube channel that produces videos about legal matters in the video game industry.
I very much doubt that for RE8.There have been PC ports of console games in the past that have had locked frame rates or settings that were “fixed” with a fan patch.
Oh I'm paying all the attention.You tried to argue with no point whatsoever because you clearly weren't paying attention.
That just says no extra DLC and stuff for other platforms, doesn't it? No one is getting a "better" version with extra DLC shit.
It says “feature and technical parity“.
Nothing to do with resolution. It's clearly talking about content.
In what world does technical parity refer to content?
The subsection is literally called "feature, content and technical parity", it's not just about content.
Oh I'm paying all the attention.
Mr moose's reply to the entire document/section:
Manabyte correcting by saying:
You saying this dumb stuff:
Manabyte correcting you:
Me correcting you:
And then you go on to quote section (ii) of the subsection, completely ignoring the full thing that talks about technical parity.
And finally you conjure up your own definitions, even though the legal document defines all things seperately already, which means they aren't the same thing, yet you try to group things together under "content".
Don't ever try to write your own legal documents.
No but I could believe the Xbox One X and PS4 Pro have forced parity.You really believe Sony blocked MS from running this game at Native 4K? Which would actually make the game run worse?
Feature parity probably is, no one wants to get a version with less shit if you're paying for marketing. I don't think this is a Unity case this time, we'll see very soon though.I thought the parity thing was actually kinda normal? (As shitty as it is)
No but I could believe the Xbox One X and PS4 Pro have forced parity.
No but I could believe the Xbox One X and PS4 Pro have forced parity.
Technical parity and content parity are two clear and distinct things.He never corrected me. Technical parity does in fact include CONTENT. That's what the description says. If you have content on PS5, then you need the same parity and no additional content on other platforms.
You're not paying attention. Stop lol
So Xbox One X version is going to have the same resolution textures as the PlayStation 4 Pro version?
Apparently that seems to be the case.Technical parity and content parity are two clear and distinct things.
That said, I don't see anything unexpected in this contract? I imagine it's fairly standard for a marketing agreement.
some people are trying to find the 2tfI just read the whole document and there is no resolution parity like some users are trying to create the narrative here.
It is basically technical, content and feature parity between PC, mobile and others console platforms.
What has Sony gotten itself into this gen? They’ve been bombarded with negative story after negative story. There’s some people that really have it out for them...jeez! I personally believe the contract to be real but the language used is confusing unless you speak legal jargon. I guess we’ll find out for sure when RE8 releases.
Think about what you're saying.The two are running at the same resolution/frame rate which is rare for those two systems.
Full document:
I believe it real because it is very standard contract and there is nothing unusual like forced parity like some are trying to say.I actually hope it's real because if someone spent time fabricating this then god help them.
No, it doesn't.Technical parity does in fact include CONTENT. That's what the description says.
Do you honestly think their "horse" is struggling?Man, if true then I guess we know what Sony's strategy this gen is.
If your horse is struggling, then pay to interfere with the other horses I guess.
You just don't get it.No, it doesn't.
If it did then the subsection only has to be called "Content parity", but it isn't; legal documents don't go out of their way to define things that just mean the same thing.
The text literally says even subject to the material platform capabalities.
Again, never write your own legal documents, you'd just end up crying in court over "but I thought just saying "content" covered everything ".
No, it doesn't, that's you ignoring that it's mentioned seperately from features and content, and conjuring up your own definitions.The term "technical parity" can include both since the subject is about maintaining parity between all platforms.
No, it doesn't.Technical parity does in fact include CONTENT.