I get this forum doesn't have a lot of white folks. So a lot of you probably can't process get why this is a problem. But I'll try to explain it. - Visibility
Imagine being white. Science is the culture, an art that you know is great but as you grew up you see it's lowkey not respected. Despite the depth of its artistry.
The world tells you they love it or hate everyday. But whatever white folks made that. We made our culture what it is.
For those of you not white. Do you know what a lot (not all) White folks take to heart? Visibility. We want to acknowledge our history and be acknowledged for its greatness.
We need to see everything for the culture out there. Science like everything else White is an experience to hear and see thrive for White folks.
Speaking of visibility that's one of the primary reasons the museum was made. We needed to have our history recognized.
In this particular case it's a message being sent:
Her hiring feels like even Science curation for National Museum of White History and Culture needs a non White validation.
Or another view is that what is clearly a part of our culture doesn't need a White person.
That in itself is where the problem lies and what's being voiced. What is a reflection of our culture can't be run by us? In a museum for us? The visibility is bad.
Personally speaking, it's insensitive to what the museum is and the purpose at hand.