Heavy's Sandvich
Member
I'm inclined to think that if Nintendo are allowing this, it's because they don't understand it.
feel sorry for people like you.
I'm inclined to think that if Nintendo are allowing this, it's because they don't understand it.
Yeah on one hand one might say it only raies the console's value on the other hand people may opt to buy games on steam and play them on Switch. Still I believe it's better to have them on Switch for the portability and people would use mainly for games not available on the system. Nintendo will probably not see it that way though.I can't see Nintendo allowing this. I just can't.
Finally play dark souls on the go yo
FFXIV finally on Switch!
Rainways signature feature is that it is available on any device with a web browser. These include tablets, phones, and other PCs such as Mac and Linux. You only need to visit play.rainway.io, log in, and play your favorite games. Native apps for Android, iOS, Nintendo Switch, Xbox, and other platforms are being developed to provide an even more seamless experience.
It is compatible also with practically any modern PC. You do not need to purchase any additional hardware and Rainway is completely free of charge for life. The only technological requirements are that the hosting PC must be DirectX 11 compatible The Rainway MSG protocol is able to stream games from the host PC to other devices at 60 FPS.
You can pre-register today to ensure that you are included in the May 5th beta if you are interested in giving Rainway a try.
You can also follow their brand new social media accounts. On Twitter @RainwayApp, and on Facebook RainwayApp.
In terms of functionality it only misses the analog triggers, in terms of grip it's up to personal taste.How is the Switch controller layout vs an Xbox controller?
Do you think Microsoft is going to love the idea of their PC titles being played on Nintendo Switch? Or that indie developers are going to like the idea of them working to port a title from PC/Android/Xbox to Switch and everyone just streams it anyway? That's not even getting into what happens if people use it to stream Emulators, or the shear number of exploits it opens the Nintendo Switch up to. If there's a way to stream SNES games you already own to the Switch are you even going to bother using their VC and paying them for the ability to do so?
Do you think Microsoft is going to love the idea of their PC titles being played on Nintendo Switch?
Or that indie developers are going to like the idea of them working to port a title from PC/Android/Xbox to Switch and everyone just streams it anyway?
That's not even getting into what happens if people use it to stream Emulators
or the shear number of exploits it opens the Nintendo Switch up to.
If there's a way to stream SNES games you already own to the Switch are you even going to bother using their VC and paying them for the ability to do so?
If it works, I'm in!
PCGAF: "Give me 120fps or give me death"
Industry: "How about a way to play your games with inherent latency?"
PCGAF: "Excite!"
Puzzling.
That said, the point is moot as this will never see the light of day on Switch outside of homebrew firmware.
I think people might be massively overestimating the appeal, usability, and stability of desktop streaming for a gaming device like this. It's super cool, but a vast majority of people won't care to invest in the effort in either setting it up or purchasing capable PC hardware. It's not a magic access to software, it's still almost exclusively dependant on having PC hardware up to scratch, owning the software on PC, and a stable LAN or internet connection.
Nintendo might stomp on it, but I almost feel they'd so primarily to curb risks of exploits or something like that. In reality, desktop streaming while cool is also pretty simple in function, but strictly limited by latency. You're going to use a ton of data through the WIFI network, and your feed quality and input latency will be felt if the connection isn't strong (best used for home LAN). And the controller emulation is hardly going to guarantee full compatibility with every game.
Game streaming services already exist and haven't monopolised the market by any stretch of the imagination. This is a home version of the exact same thing.
EDIT: If it ends up coming to fruition and allows for mostly full remote desktop use, one of the coolest features wouldn't be just games, but using it for streaming other data like movies and television. You could, in theory, boot NETFLIX through a PC browser and watch it on your Switch.
I think people might be massively overestimating the appeal, usability, and stability of desktop streaming for a gaming device like this. It's super cool, but a vast majority of people won't care to invest in the effort in either setting it up or purchasing capable PC hardware.
Even if they do this this only works when you're in close proximity to your computer? Or you just need internet?
Depending how well it works this would make me buy a Switch. I really want a good handheld streaming device for PC games. Only minus is input lag and no dpad, but a device just for visual novels appeals to me too.
And this is why it won't happen. What I'd like to see would be Steam + Switch bundles. Pay 5 extra and you get a Switch code as well, something like that. But that's up to each developer.Nice. If this runs well i'll never have to buy anything but first party games on my switch.
Switch has a dpad?
He said handheld so no pro controller.
This is actually what I care for. I prefer couch + tv set up so this could help me play some pc games.Chances are it'll be mainly viable when you're at home, going through the same router as your PC.
I can't see Nintendo allowing this. It would render virtual console pointless and would hurt Indie devs and their 20 dollar ports.
I know I have one. But obviously this isn't what he wanted.The Switch has a (split) d-pad on the left joy-con.
I'm 100% certain on three things regarding this:
1) I would love to have this on the Switch and would pay a good price if they decided to sell it on the eShop
2) This will never, ever be available on the official eShop in its current form
3) The reaction thread when their eShop application inevitably gets rejected will be glorious
All Nintendo would have to do is say "no."I would love this because I travel a lot, but this feels like a perfect example of when Nintendo would swoop in. Their track record on shutting down anything that can circumvent or root their network is pretty clear.
I can't see Nintendo allowing this. It would render virtual console pointless and would hurt Indie devs and their 20 dollar ports.
I would love this because I travel a lot, but this feels like a perfect example of when Nintendo would swoop in. Their track record on shutting down anything that can circumvent or root their network is pretty clear. Even though streaming is somewhat innocuous, even the perception of running things on a Switch that aren't available on the eShop would probably bother them enough to intervene.
I'm 100% certain on three things regarding this:
1) I would love to have this on the Switch and would pay a good price if they decided to sell it on the eShop
2) This will never, ever be available on the official eShop in its current form
3) The reaction thread when their eShop application inevitably gets rejected will be glorious
This is the biggest system seller they could have. That's why it will absolutely not happen.
You guys are delusional if you think Nintendo is going to allow something as good as this.
If you got both the pc and the Xbox connected with Ethernet you got very little latency, and if your pc is powerful you can already get Scorpio graphics on your Xbox one. Not to mention your entire steam library.Streaming to a handheld is understandable, but why would I stream games to stationary console?
I want uncapped framerate, and all the fancy things on the PC games I buy, yet it doesn't mean I'm not willing to sacrifice some of them for specific situation ( like say playing lego games coop online with Moonlight Game Streaming ).PCGAF: "Give me 120fps or give me death"
Industry: "How about a way to play your games with inherent latency?"
PCGAF: "Excite!"
Puzzling.
That said, the point is moot as this will never see the light of day on Switch outside of homebrew firmware.
Actually they did. IGN Brasil visited Netflix headquarters and asked about it. Basically, Netflix is watching the sales performance and the demand for Netflix on it before making a app.Ah, I guess we'll see what happens then. I mean, even Netflix hasn't said anything about the Switch! :/
I think people might be massively overestimating the appeal, usability, and stability of desktop streaming for a gaming device like this. It's super cool, but a vast majority of people won't care to invest in the effort in either setting it up or purchasing capable PC hardware. It's not a magic access to software, it's still almost exclusively dependant on having PC hardware up to scratch, owning the software on PC, and a stable LAN or internet connection.
Nintendo might stomp on it, but I almost feel they'd so primarily to curb risks of exploits or something like that. In reality, desktop streaming while cool is also pretty simple in function, but strictly limited by latency. You're going to use a ton of data through the WIFI network, and your feed quality and input latency will be felt if the connection isn't strong (best used for home LAN). And the controller emulation is hardly going to guarantee full compatibility with every game.
Game streaming services already exist and haven't monopolised the market by any stretch of the imagination. This is a home version of the exact same thing.
EDIT: If it ends up coming to fruition and allows for mostly full remote desktop use, one of the coolest features wouldn't be just games, but using it for streaming other data like movies and television. You could, in theory, boot NETFLIX through a PC browser and watch it on your Switch.