I understand what you're saying. i'm talking about a female with group of guys, in a gang, just doesn't fit the setting for me.
Don't watch Hateful Eight.
I understand what you're saying. i'm talking about a female with group of guys, in a gang, just doesn't fit the setting for me.
Revolver had 4 different playable protagonists.
did you also whine about metal gear solid 2, re: revelations 2, civilization revolution 2, etc.?
Yeah, I've never managed to finish a GTA game. Just get bored after a while. RDR was my favorite game of last gen, though.
Wait, so the only way the game would be acceptable to you is if the 7 characters were something like:
Female white
Male White
Female African American
Male African American
Female Native American Indian
Male Native American Indian
Maybe through in a Mexican character as well..
hmmmm... It would be nice in theory, but is it really needed if the focus is on his gang?
Ok but then Marston can't be the main character because the game's name wouldn't make sense... you can't have your second Redemption before your first.
Shame it's not set in the modern day, or near future. Ahh well.
Shame it's not set in the modern day, or near future. Ahh well.
UhhShame it's not set in the modern day, or near future. Ahh well.
It just feels like the easy title. I know that it will bring a lot more attention and sale because the last one was received so well so it's smart in that regard. Just feels a little lazy? For lack of a better wordIt really is
they're not sequels of one another, their spiritual successors/predecessors, if you mean revolver and redemption. redemption 2 looks like a direct sequel to the second game, but even then i'd prefer a new R word because this series doesn't get a lot of installments. could've added a new title to remember, just like redemption.Two games that i don't really consider sequels of one another - narrative wise. But i'm super fuzzy about Revolver, barely played it.
i don't care much if the main character is white or not, what rockstar is doing is for telling the best story they could - doesn't mean it'll be a well received story by everyone and doesn't mean they couldn't also tell a story just as good if not better with a native american protagonist.Okay? That applies to basically any piece of media irrespective of whether or not they push for more diversity or not; not sure what you're trying to argue here.
Do people not realize how poor an example it is to bring up old stories/movies not having women in them as a justification for a property in 2016 also not having women in it?
This is like complaining about Django Unchained because there weren't any black cowboys in old Hollywood westerns.
LOL, Female outlaws existed dude. In fact most outlaw gangs were minorities.I understand what you're saying. i'm talking about a female with group of guys, in a gang, just doesn't fit the setting for me.
I don't think that's true...
they're not sequels of one another, their spiritual successors/predecessors, if you mean revolver and redemption. redemption 2 looks like a direct sequel to the second game, but even then i'd prefer a new R word because this series doesn't get a lot of installments. could've added a new title to remember, just like redemption.
i don't care much if the main character is white or not, what rockstar is doing is for telling the best story they could - doesn't mean it'll be a well received story by everyone and doesn't mean they couldn't also tell a story just as good if not better with a native american protagonist.
Why would you assume there are no women in the game? Marston's wife and Bonnie were both awesome.
"Zero excuse"... So you're saying that someone creating a piece of art literally doesn't have the right to deliver their own vision? Obviously you're not referring to any actual legal requirements as there are none, so you must be saying there is some kind of universal moral imperative that any creator must obey regardless of what they actually feel like making?
I cannot stand this kind of entitled attitude. "How dare anyone create something that doesn't prescribe to my particular sensibilities!" Here's the thing: you can absolutely be disappointed if it's not what you wanted. Everyone has preferences, and you should absolutely tell a company that you are interested in (your preferred experience here). They might even do that at some point. But there is a difference between saying "I'm super disappointed this doesn't have a female protagonist! I would have really liked that" and "Fuck you dev you slimy racist bastards how dare you make the game you want and not the one I want!". That's the problem. The complaint is always that it's wrong that they didn't make what you wanted, which is the definition of entitlement.
This angers me because I want to have the freedom to make what I want to make. I don't want to be yelled at because I told a story that was on my heart, but it wasn't exactly what someone else would have created. The greatest works of art come from creators expressing their visions, because it's a story they have to tell, a picture they have to paint, music they have to write.
There is a TON of media that doesn't interest me. Things like the Saw movies disgust me. I think the world would probably be better off without that, so should I campaign to have those banned? Should I form an oversight committee to govern the direction of a sequel so that it's something I want? Or should I leave the creative direction to the people who actually wanted that to begin with?
Rockstar committed a grave sin here by releasing a picture that only has men in it, which means this is clearly going to be a horrible sexist game, right? So I'm curious. Would you go back in time and complain about Seven Samurai because the leads are men? I mean, that's seven lead characters and they are all men. That's bad, right? And yet, for some reason, as summarized by Wikipedia:
It almost seems like it might have actually been a good movie with a good story despite starring only men. How about The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings? Some of the greatest, most influential works of fiction in history, and they predominantly star men. Do you know why? Because these are the stories and the characters that the creators wanted to create.
Here's the truth: there are a lot of video games, that feature all manner of characters. Are there not as many representing what you are looking for? Here's an idea. Don't demand a creator change their vision to match yours. Instead of bitching about it, go make the game you want. That's what I'm doing. I will enjoy what media I enjoy, and will add what I think is missing.
If I was Microsoft I'd be throwing those dollars at them for some kinda upgrade gen exclusivity
No. Do you not see the pattern that's being disrupted here?
Could this be Steven Ogg?
I would love if steven Ogg was part of this game
Shame it's not set in the modern day, or near future. Ahh well.
What the hell?
yea I started that. But my reasoning behind it is that if the game is as creative as its name is... we in TROUBLE.
And that's how I feel about!
Thank goodness you are not MSFT.
When's the last time Rockstar did that?Isn't the trailer gonna be some CGI trailer?
women aren't a minority.
More than 50% of the world's population are women.
A big share of video game players is female, certainly a bigger share than there is of any single one of the ethnic minorities you mentioned.
It just feels like the easy title. I know that it will bring a lot more attention and sale because the last one was received so well so it's smart in that regard. Just feels a little lazy? For lack of a better word
It's just a brand name maybe now? Just like they do with GTA - Red Dead Redemption is now associated with this 'series'.
So what part of bullet time fits the setting for you? Ah yes, the legendary bullet time outlaws.I understand what you're saying. i'm talking about a female with group of guys, in a gang, just doesn't fit the setting for me.
Shame it's not set in the modern day, or near future. Ahh well.
What the hell?