Nightmare452
Member
the metascore is 97, Breath of the wild is also 97, both are Nintendo games
few weeks ago i said that reviewers go easy on Nintendo games and lots of gaffer jumped on me
i'm not saying that the game doesn't deserve high scores, it probably does, but why would BOTW and Mario get 97MC but Witcher 3 gets 92MC ? even though Witcher 3 is better than Zelda and probably without a doubt better than any Mario game released
Honestly, the Witcher 3 was/is a tad overate IMO. The combat is a bit weak and story is a mess (I found it boring, couldn't force myself to finish it). Its not fair comparing the gems Nintendo made this year to the bloated Witcher 3 (I mean it has tons of content, but that itself gets boring/repetitive after a while). I personally think Zelda is a better open world, but that does not make Witcher 3 bad, and viceversa. Reviewers just think Nintendo games have an extra charm and polish (by far), thus the slight higher scores. Does it really matter anyway, just play them all, enjoy them, if you prefer one over the other, good, nothing changes, the higher score does not affect your enjoyment of Witcher does it.