It is funny because it's so to the point and in such contrast to MS's nonsense.Just so everyone's clear yosp didn't say anything funny or witty, he just responded to a question on whether or not Sony would ban if street fate was broken with , "no."
That's not the point. He literally is a Jr. but it's being used in a disrespectful and condescending day.
"Woman, go do this"...well she IS a woman, right.
Playing on the system before launch =/= leaking information on the internet
I guess I'm the only one who doesn't find this awesome. Kinda think its petty and a little silly to be honest.
Wow, the Shield/PS4 replacement is super well done!
I don't understand where this embargo thing is coming from; it's in the other thread too.No but if you show video of games that are under strict embargos it could lead to something.
Doesn't that go without saying? The vast majority of the posts in this thread are people marveling at how "easy" MS is making this for Sony. Thats not really referencing altruism.
Oh, now you want to talk Larry?
Fuck you! Grow a fucking pair and accept the consecuences of the horrible decitions your company makes.
Wow, the Shield/PS4 replacement is super well done!
I guess I'm the only one who doesn't find this awesome. Kinda think its petty and a little silly to be honest.
probably don't have the infrastructure to ban people.
That'll be coming in a future update
he's nothing if not an opportunist.
Very childish.
It's not really a leak though is it, in any normal usage of the word. These systems are out in the wild, they've been made and they're in warehouses. It just so happened one got shipped out by mistake. This isn't like Julian Assange level stuff here.Playing on the system before launch =/= leaking information on the internet
Interesting, though not completely unpredictable responses.
I don't understand where this embargo thing is coming from; it's in the other thread too.
As a consumer you aren't under any embargo.
If you somehow legally received COD: Ghosts online prior to release and review/presss embargo, you could post whatever you want about it.
I guess I'm the only one who doesn't find this awesome. Kinda think its petty and a little silly to be honest.
What on earth does the terms of service of their online networks have to do with press embargoes on information?Once you signed into the Playstation Network (or XBox Live) you automatically agree to the terms of use. Hopefully Major Nelson can shine some light as to why that persons system was red-flagged (which he has said is not going to be a perma-ban).
But will they ban if someone shows off all the features?
That seems to be what got the guy in trouble, right?
Playing on the system before launch =/= leaking information on the internet
If Sony doesn't run away with next gen race something is wrong with gamers they are doing everything right...
I expect a PS2 blowout..MS and Ninty will launch new system in 4-5 years...
What on earth does the terms of service of their online networks have to do with press embargoes on information?
It's not really a leak though is it, in any normal usage of the word. These systems are out in the wild, they've been made and they're in warehouses. It just so happened one got shipped out by mistake. This isn't like Julian Assange level stuff here.
If through doing so he is presenting to the public information which MS hasn't revealed already and wanted to keep private for now then he is leaking information.Playing the console UI and games and storefront as intended isn't "leaking information", the Xbox is not the freaking NSA. The dashboard is not the script to the newest Tarantino film. Call of Duty is already out.
Playing the console UI and games and storefront as intended isn't "leaking information", the Xbox is not the freaking NSA. The dashboard is not the script to the newest Tarantino film. Call of Duty is already out.
He's revealing information which MS has decided to keep private and away from the general public for the time being.
What is this from?
He's revealing information which MS has decided to keep private and away from the general public for the time being.
But posting pics of how many people are playing any given game is sorta leaking information. Considering the only people playing are internal Microsoft beta testers.
He didn't do anything wrong. He got his xbox all legal. No crime committed. There shouldn't be any punishment for it.
He would have no way of knowing about an embargo, because he didn't sign an NDA.
The ban comes across as coming from a bunch of robots.
I can't tell if this is a serious post or not.
I'm really confused as to what you're talking about now. :/The guy uploaded video to YouTube and was signed into his account while doing so. Regardless, it will not be a permaban.
How is this crap relevant? Their network being brought down by external sources has exactly nothing to do with this situation. Also, they have everyone games to make up for it, so at least they tried. I don't remember getting much of anything from MS when Live went down (though obviously it never went down for such a long time). Seems like you might be a bit salty, friend.sony got there network brought down for over a month because of a bad decision , people have put them on such a pedestal , its going to be a long crash to the ground when it happens . not that i claim ms is any better . confusing a good pr campaign with actual altruism is big mistake .