It's not quantity that matter, but quality.
With the exception of TLoU, I can't think of a game that got universal acclaim, as well as commercial success from WWS recently.
More in line with every upcoming PS4 exclusive not being a must have for gamers.
And name how many PS3 games actually benefitted from it?
So you are the press spokesman for all the gamers in the world?
Thank you for knowing what we want.
The game media think it's decide quality the people that buy the games do also.
For eg Infamous SS sold 1 million in 9 days but the media would make you think FH2 and SSO are bigger games.
Still they could not sell 200k in NPD in first month .
'Filler games' is the stupidest concept ever.
What? How's it different? I was kind of hoping to jump into the series with it
Xbox to sell more worldwide?
Fable games were campaign based RPG games, so mainly single player games. Fable Legends appear to be MMO-like RPG, so mainly a multiplayer game.
You are really a funny guy.If you're going to twist everything I post, continue on.
Every single exclusive and even some multiplats? (like GTA V)
I see where you're coming from, especially with regards to how the media glosses over Sony exclusives.
But I would say in the case of Infamou:SS, the game was a clear step down from previous titles, whereas FH2 improved from FH1 and SSO is a fresh new IP.
Expectation were higher for Infamous.
It's a very real phenomena at play though.
I've seen people gloss over games like Rime and Until Dawn as filler because they lack the production values/pomp of AAA games.
I see where you're coming from, especially with regards to how the media glosses over Sony exclusives.
But I would say in the case of Infamou:SS, the game was a clear step down from previous titles, whereas FH2 improved from FH1 and SSO is a fresh new IP.
Welp.
Hype down to 0
Thanks for the info though. I should have looked into it more.
As someone who played Infamous 1 and 2, I felt Second Son was the best game in the series. Opinions tho
Were the same articles written about MS when 360 was doing do well after launch?
Second Son was definitely better than inFAMOUS 2.
Damn right!Yeah. 1 still definitely had the best story. THAT ENDING!
It's a very real phenomena at play though.
I've seen people gloss over games like Rime and Until Dawn as filler because they lack the production values/pomp of AAA games.
You are really a funny guy.
At least your last posts here made me chuckle.
Thank you sir
I see where you're coming from, especially with regards to how the media glosses over Sony exclusives.
But I would say in the case of Infamou:SS, the game was a clear step down from previous titles, whereas FH2 improved from FH1 and SSO is a fresh new IP.
Expectation were higher for Infamous.
You can have your opinion. And believe me, I know that you are a Xbox gamer.The more quality games, the better. I'm just not go around parading stuff like Inside or Cuphead as "genre-defining" titles.
I am a Xbox gamer if I haven't already made it obvious.
Welp.
Hype down to 0
Thanks for the info though. I should have looked into it more.
how could your hype get lower than the progression seen from
Fable 1 to 2 to 3...
three is actual shit, the only hope the franchise really had was to revamp it, but yeah I feel your pain with what they are proposing to do....
how could your hype get lower than the progression seen from
Fable 1 to 2 to 3...
three is actual shit, the only hope the franchise really had was to revamp it, but yeah I feel your pain with what they are proposing to do....
Basically equal games with VERY different narratives being pushed by the media.
And so you decided to validate their stupid opinions. Smart move.
'Filler games' is the stupidest concept ever.
Just last year Sony brought out 2 new AAA console IP TLOU , Beyond: Two Souls .
I not saying this year was not worst than normal but Sony seem to be returning to normal next year .
I agree, this would be the side effect of MS dominating Sony for nearly an entire generation.
Give the press some time, they'll eventually tone down the bias.
I should note that I personally enjoy "filler" games as much as I enjoy AAA stuff.
I'm merely confirming the notion of "filler" that people use to justify the dismissal of games like Rime.
How is Rime a filler? To whoever said that.
Fable games were campaign based RPG games, so mainly single player games. Fable Legends appear to be MMO-like RPG, so mainly a multiplayer game.
I'm going to be honest.
Sony would be better served to move away from this boom/bust cycle they have going on, where one year we are inundated with many exclusives, which is then followed by a rather barren year of exclusives.
What I'm saying is, Yoshida needs to get his shit together -_-"
Well it look like he is doing that .
Like i said before we already know they going to have GOW4 , Bend new IP , GG new IP for 2016 .
Was gonna say that but didn't want to be spanked 😂american journalists showing their true colors
Well it look like he is doing that .
Like i said before we already know they going to have GOW4 , Bend new IP , GG new IP for 2016 .
Coworkers mostly.
Rime seems like an indie/non-AAA to them.
Hence, filler.
Were the same articles written about MS when 360 was doing do well after launch?
It certainly appears to me that some sites almost seem upset (in general tone) that MS hasn't just walked away with it after the 360 and I can't work out why.
Every day that passes is another day I find myself impressed with your posts. You have a way of surpassing expectations. In a very, very negative way.
360 was probably the first introduction to gaming for many of the writers in question. It's hard to forget your first love.
Did Sony call the Nintendo "a shell of it's former self" recently?
That kind of stuff needs to stop. That's the Sony nobody likes.
Well it look like he is doing that .
Like i said before we already know they going to have GOW4 , Bend new IP , GG new IP for 2016 .