Fuuuuuuck, I thought this was that other "old" story. He thinks the greatest compliment he can give someone is telling them he'd like to fuck them.
Ok, lets say the Republican Party splits. which group leaves the party to start a new one? The moderates/establishment create a new party while the far right takes over the Republican party or the far right forms a new party? I figure the centrist party will be the one that lasts, but the interesting thing is, eventually, the far right and moderate right have to form one party again, so what happens there? Moderates hope they can control them this time?
why?
Again, what gets to people is what's on Nightly News.
NBC Nightly News spent 9 minutes dragging the fuck out of Trump. Literally dragging him to hell. They posted the video again. They had the taped video of his accusers. They called him "unhinged." They said he ranted today. They posted the poll numbers. Then they showed large chunks of Michelle's speech. It was 9 minutes of pure hell.
AND I LIVE MAMA
AND I LIVE MAMA
Yep. Nobody watches pundits all day, but they do watch The Today Show before work and the Nightly News when that get home.
10 is not 14
How did his family not know he was a sexual predator?
You have to wonder if they were at best in denial or at worst complicit in his behavior.
And given that, why the hell didn't they say, no Dad, don't run for president.
Third party candidates can win regionally, like Wallace, Thurmond, or La Follette. McMullin is definitely a regional candidate in the same way.On one hand, McMuffin winning Utah stops Trump's president dreams immediately.
On the other hand, I really don't want to hear from any of the 3rd-party candidates ever after this election.
In my defense:
1. A lot of news is moving fast and this is extremely similar to something that's already happened.
2. How many men make comments in public about two wildly underage girls saying he's going to date them one day?
If you've got Amazon Prime, you get 6 months free and 4.99 thereafter.
In my defense:
1. A lot of news is moving fast and this is extremely similar to something that's already happened.
2. How many men make comments in public about two wildly underage girls saying he's going to date them one day?
How many men make comments in public about two wildly underage girls saying he's going to date them one day?
I'm loving Gloria Borger on CNN not holding back on Trump, showing her disdain for him and saying he's a bully and predatory. It's refreshing when CNN has been trying to keep unbiased... though lately everyone is finally showing that Trump is not a cool choice.
As a Democrat in New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District this is going to be me until election day:
![]()
I have competitive Senate, Congress, and Governor races. At least HRC is a lock here and the other state positions are lost causes already.
This weekend I will start going door-to-door, rallying Democrats to vote in November. Wish me the best!
Silly question, but how do I do this? I'm not seeing anything on Amazon for signing up for a subscription.
Go to https://subscribe.washingtonpost.com/prime/#/, log in to your Amazon Prime account, set up which payment to use for the sub, and done.
We don't, we let the media do it, which is exactly what's happening.Here's a conversation I want to have. I'm not sure what the question I am asking is. Maybe somebody can help me parse the concern into a meaningful point.
Donald is being accused left and right by women he has allegedly assaulted. The examples that we have are quite old - over a decade in some cases. Donald responds to these accusations by calling the women liars.
But Donald and his team are also accusing Bill Clinton of sexually assaulting women. The examples that we have are quite old, decades in some cases. If Bill Clinton is innocent, which we cannot prove without a doubt, then these women are lying.
This is a difficult situation because there is no way HRC and the Democrats can address the accusations without implying the same excuse Donald is making: that the accusations are simply false.
How do we reconcile that? How do we refute Bill Clinton's accusations without validating Donald's own denial? Because all we mostly have are the testimonies of the victims.
The one thing I am confused and my friend asks me. Is why did Hillary delete the 33,000 personal emails when there was a subpoena?
How do I answer that?
Thanks.
Here's a conversation I want to have. I'm not sure what the question I am asking is. Maybe somebody can help me parse the concern into a meaningful point.
Donald is being accused left and right by women he has allegedly assaulted. The examples that we have are quite old - over a decade in some cases. Donald responds to these accusations by calling the women liars.
But Donald and his team are also accusing Bill Clinton of sexually assaulting women. The examples that we have are quite old, decades in some cases. If Bill Clinton is innocent, which we cannot prove without a doubt, then these women are lying.
This is a difficult situation because there is no way HRC and the Democrats can address the accusations without implying the same excuse Donald is making: that the accusations are simply false.
How do we reconcile that? How do we refute Bill Clinton's accusations without validating Donald's own denial? Because all we mostly have are the testimonies of the victims.
The one thing I am confused and my friend asks me. Is why did Hillary delete the 33,000 personal emails when there was a subpoena?
How do I answer that?
Thanks.
The one thing I am confused and my friend asks me. Is why did Hillary delete the 33,000 personal emails when there was a subpoena?
How do I answer that?
Thanks.
My understanding is that she didn't delete them herself. She hired an IT guy to manage the servers and among told him not to delete anything for any reason without her permission. But for whatever reason, he panicked and went behind her back and deleted them anyway without telling her at all so she didn't find out until it was too late. Hillary herself is completely not responsible for that in any way as she had no way of knowing the guy would do something like that.The one thing I am confused and my friend asks me. Is why did Hillary delete the 33,000 personal emails when there was a subpoena?
How do I answer that?
Thanks.
The one thing I am confused and my friend asks me. Is why did Hillary delete the 33,000 personal emails when there was a subpoena?
How do I answer that?
Thanks.
As a Democrat in New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District this is going to be me until election day:
<sylvestercoffee.gif>
I have competitive Senate, Congress, and Governor races. At least HRC is a lock here and the other state positions are lost causes already.
This weekend I will start going door-to-door, rallying Democrats to vote in November. Wish me the best!
1st district? Pshaw. Get over to the superior 2nd district where our House seat isn't a ping-pong ball!As a fellow Democrat from New Hampshire's 1st district I wish you the best of luck. Election day is going to be stressful!
Still waiting for my absentee ballot to arrive.
We're just inching closer and closer to a "Donald groomed Ivanka" bomb. Fucking hell.
The IT person was told to delete them before subpoena but he forgot. After subpoena he remembered and deleted them. It wasn't right, but FBI found no evidence Clinton instructed deletion after subpoena.The emails were deleted before the subpoena iirc, possibly through orderly deletion schedules
Republicans think she had something to hide
I'm curious if Trump's remaining ultra-loyal advisers (or even GOP leadership) have just straight-up asked him at this point, "Dude, is there anything heinous you've done in the past that hasn't come to light yet? If so, you need to tell us now so in the event that it does, we can be prepared for it."
We're just inching closer and closer to a "Donald groomed Ivanka" bomb. Fucking hell.
Low effort trollthe unfortunate answer is that yes, she's corrupt as hell but trump is a million times worse
You think anyone left has those kind of balls?
Please no...