• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Dragon's Crown (Vanillaware PS3/PSV) Sorceress Trailer

QisTopTier

XisBannedTier
Maybe there should be a new thread started to talk about the actual Sorceress trailer and the game instead of how badly the Sorceress's grotesque designs are/aren't hurting women/the game industry, and redirect anybody who wants to talk about the latter to this thread.

I completely agree honestly. This thread has turned into a mess.

I wouldn't mind a general gameplay analysis thread but not one specifically for the sorc.


Huh you mean this wasn't that thread? Oh geez poor lime must of got his topics mixed up.
 

blurrygil

Member
Maybe there should be a new thread started to talk about the actual Sorceress trailer and the game instead of how badly the Sorceress's grotesque designs are/aren't hurting women/the game industry, how anybody who likes the character are misogynist pigs and/or pedophiles, and redirect anybody who wants to talk about the latter stuff to this thread.

There is, which was long overdue: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=535704
 

kuroshiki

Member
Holy Crap people you guys still arguing about this?!



----found out that only Lime was furiously defending himself as a sole light of purpose and enlightenment ----


eh. carry on.
 

RMI

Banned
yeah I agree it's super sad that this thread turned into such a mess. I know Lime has promised not to shit all over the eventual OT, but I hope the rest of the speech and debate team can control themselves and that thread stays on topic, because I'm super excited for this game, will be getting it day 1, and want to have a place to talk about the actual game with other GAFers.
 
yeah I agree it's super sad that this thread turned into such a mess. I know Lime has promised not to shit all over the eventual OT, but I hope the rest of the speech and debate team can control themselves and that thread stays on topic, because I'm super excited for this game, will be getting it day 1, and want to have a place to talk about the actual game with other GAFers.

I'm sure all this discussion is going to make the game more popular, and then some haters will play it and love it.
 

-COOLIO-

The Everyman
It actually looks good...mysterious ninja approach to sorcery.

the funny thing is that male wizards have had that style (apart from the face covering) for years. put it on a woman and it does seem out of place because women in fantasy mythology look weird if they don't have nearly completed exposed bosom. personally, i dont even have a problem with sexualized characters if the tone is right for it, but people have the right to think this is distasteful or out of place regardless.
 

FartOfWar

Banned
This doesn't get said enough. My company has probably a 50/50 mix of men to women, but the IT department is almost entirely men. By contrast accountants and auditors are predominantly female. People pursue different jobs for different reasons, but our IT department is not light on females because we're sexist.

The same goes for wage studies that look at industries rather than roles and experience, and ignore little things like maternity leave impacting a women's earning potential (in the same way it would for a man if he took 12 months out from his career).

To be fair, you can't say with certainty that the disparity is not due to sexism. The point is that - as opposed to moral posturing - proof is burdensome. Moral posturing is so alluring that it leads us to neglect normal standards of logic. For instance, although American unemployment rates are higher among men in different demographic groups, no one is offering sexism as an explanation for that disparity. It fails to provide opportunity for moral posturing on the side of the angels. My point is not that sexism is probably involved in that case - I don't suspect it has anything to do with it at all - but that morally attractive propositions are subject to less scrutiny.
 
You haven't used ad hominems?

Saying that people are misinformed, misguided or another variation of this is not an ad-hominem attack.

Yes. Yes. We're all uneducated fools ripe for your words of wisdom about the world.

Lime is probably the only person who has posted scientific articles to back up his assertions of facts, so yes, educate yourself.

While this is an aside, this one was in response to my pointing out that this game is primarily targeted toward Japanese people. The fact that you immediately equated "Japanese" with "Asians at large" just shows much you lack when it comes to capacity for nuance.

First off you don't know how to use quotation marks. You don't just randomly add quotation marks to something no one said. Second Japan is in Asia so as Lime said products there are typically aimed at that market. The fact that you couldn't understand that shows how much you lack when it comes to capacity for reading and comprehension.

Great implication that you don't respect anyone else you're replying to right here...

Lime clarified what he meant when he said "I thought you were better than this" to certain posters, so I'm not sure why you are bringing this up.

Anyway, that took way too much time. You may not be making overt personal attacks, but you're certainly implying that everyone in here who disagrees with you is either ignorant, or "part of the problem," because they are retaining their original positions despite your enlightening them about gender issues.

You come off as extremely arrogant and talk down to everyone. There should be no confusion as to why the air might turn hostile toward you when you present yourself in such a manner and act is if you are the only one with all of the facts.

Again, with the quotes. Unless I am sorely mistaken (in which case laugh at me) Lime never used the phrase "part of the problem" so why are you putting it in quotation marks?

Many people were disagreeing with the facts that Lime brought out via the studies he posted. If you can't disprove the study or any flaw with it and you still post that it's wrong then I don't blame Lime for getting a little snarky.

The air turned hostile because people have decided that they don't want to hear opinions or facts that run contrary to their worldview anymore and they must take shots at anyone who talks out of line.
 

-COOLIO-

The Everyman
The size of her tits isn't the issue. She is very clearly being sexually objectified.

NzmP1VT.jpg

i think the size is kind of an issue. they're gargantuan. the more i think about it the more i agree with the penny arcade comic. if they had a male character with a dick that big players would complain that it was weird and out of place. that said, there's nothing inherently wrong with this stylistic choice but people have the right to find it out of place without being called anti-feminist (kinda wonky how the script got flipped in this thread).
 
i think the size is kind of an issue. they're gargantuan.

Because her proportions are exaggerated. The same goes for the Fighter, Dwarf and Amazon. Do you have an issue with those? So how exactly is her character out of place? If anything the Elf and the Wizard are the characters that are out of place because they're the only characters that don't feature exaggerated proportions.
 

AkuMifune

Banned
Because her proportions are exaggerated. The same goes for the Fighter, Dwarf and Amazon. Do you have an issue with those? So how exactly is her character out of place? If anything the Elf and the Wizard are the characters that are out of place because they're the only characters that don't feature exaggerated proportions.

It's this kind of fake innocent defensiveness that keeps driving the argument. I don't like this art, but at least I can say "to each his own", while the other side seems too stubborn to even admit that this particular drawing (and the ungodly jiggle) may be out of line. You guys keep wondering why this particular image out of all the other semi-hentai crap that comes out is getting so much attention? Really? You can't fathom it AT ALL? Ok. We must just really have nothing else to get upset about today.
 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
First off you don't know how to use quotation marks. You don't just randomly add quotation marks to something no one said. Second Japan is in Asia so as Lime said products there are typically aimed at that market. The fact that you couldn't understand that shows how much you lack when it comes to capacity for reading and comprehension.

I disagree with most of your post, but I only feel like responding to this part. You're using "that market" to refer to some kind of "Asian market" that you think exists. A product aimed at specific consumers in Japan is not a product aimed at a more broad "Asian market." What I was pointing out was that the two are not the same at all and that equating "Japanese" with a more general "Asian" group is just plain wrong.
 

QisTopTier

XisBannedTier
It's this kind of fake innocent defensiveness that keeps driving the argument. I don't like this art, but at least I can say "to each his own", while the other side seems too stubborn to even admit that this particular drawing (and the ungodly jiggle) may be out of line. You guys keep wondering why this particular image out of all the other semi-hentai crap that comes out is getting so much attention? Really? You can't fathom it AT ALL? Ok. We must just really have nothing else to get upset about today.

Everyone understands some people might be turnned off or offended by the sorc or artstyle of the game in general, but she's not even remotely out of place in the game. Thus singling her out when she's not out of place in her own game is silly when trying to make an argument about said game.
 
It's this kind of fake innocent defensiveness that keeps driving the argument. I don't like this art, but at least I can say "to each his own", while the other side seems too stubborn to even admit that this particular drawing (and the ungodly jiggle) may be out of line.

I'm not going to sit here and lie and say that I think it's out of line when I don't. It's right in line with the rest of the art in the game. Now if you don't like that art then that's perfectly fine. I can completely see why someone wouldn't like her design. But that doesn't mean that she's out of place.
 

Metrotab

Banned
It's this kind of fake innocent defensiveness that keeps driving the argument. I don't like this art, but at least I can say "to each his own", while the other side seems too stubborn to even admit that this particular drawing (and the ungodly jiggle) may be out of line. You guys keep wondering why this particular image out of all the other semi-hentai crap that comes out is getting so much attention? Really? You can't fathom it AT ALL? Ok. We must just really have nothing else to get upset about today.

But this game has a diverse cast of women, each with a very distinct build. The Sorceress' character design is only an issue when you don't see it in the whole of the game and ignore the artistic vision behind it.
 
This game/character is a terrible pulpit to use as your crowning example of sexual objectification of women in video games. I wish people would stop.
 

-COOLIO-

The Everyman
Because her proportions are exaggerated. The same goes for the Fighter, Dwarf and Amazon. Do you have an issue with those? So how exactly is her character out of place? If anything the Elf and the Wizard are the characters that are out of place because they're the only characters that don't feature exaggerated proportions.

are their dicks massive?
 
Lime is probably the only person who has posted scientific articles to back up his assertions of facts, so yes, educate yourself.

Not the only one:

Their conclusion was cautious and not conclusive. They also didn't do a similar study on men to see if playing sexualized male characters would have an impact on their self-esteem. And the effect was short term.

In fact according to this study Self-esteem of computer games players in adolescence
Both men and women experience a decline in self esteem after playing video games.

Taking it a bit further back
Facial attractiveness and self-esteem in adolescence.

I would find it highly unlikely that men are immune to this effect as well. Perhaps what this is really telling us is sexualized characters (male and female) should not be available to children? Would be an interesting study.

Still not a good reason to not have characters like her for audiences who want it. Its just not for everyone.

I then sent some of the following to lime in a pm:

http://www.mendeley.com/catalog/ster...h-performance/
http://www.mendeley.com/catalog/gap-...tion-earnings/

These studies are on gender stereotypes and the harmful effects they have on women's abilities to perform. Weakness in math pretty much locks women out of STEM fields and things that enforce these gender roles only make the matters worse. These studies don't hold back with their assesment:

"traditional gender role orientation continues to exacerbate the gender wage gap."

"when the test was described as producing gender differences and stereotype threat was high, women performed substantially worse than equally qualified men did."

Their language is explicit as the results are. Enforced gender roles and stereotypes, such as "women suck at math", "women should stay at home", or a lack of female representation are genuinely harmful to a woman's ability to perform professionally.

This is from the abstract of the study Lime linked:
"Results cautiously suggest that playing a sexualized video game heroine unfavorably influenced people’s beliefs about women in the real world."

Their language is more reserved and in the study itself they speak more abstractly. The two studies I linked above included men to compare their effects, but this one didn't. In fact there was a surge of studies concerning sexualization from 2008-1012 and most seemed to focus only on women.
When you take into consideration the earlier studies (the one from my quote) that show both men and women receive a negative effect to self esteem when presented with beautiful or idealized versions of their sex, I really think that sexualization is being unfairly mixed in with the genuinely harmful gender stereotyping and enforced roles. We're all effected by body image.
 
I disagree with most of your post, but I only feel like responding to this part. You're using "that market" to refer to some kind of "Asian market" that you think exists. A product aimed at specific consumers in Japan is not a product aimed at a more broad "Asian market." What I was pointing out was that the two are not the same at all and that equating "Japanese" with a more general "Asian" group is just plain wrong.

People always generalise and talk about Eastern and Western styles of video games, and eastern and western markets. Lime's generalisation of Western and "Asian consumers" was in-context perfectly fine.
 

-COOLIO-

The Everyman
Breasts aren't a sexual organ last time I checked. But maybe I've been doing stuff wrong this whole time.

so the artist is just exaggerating muscles and breasts? why not muscles and hands? or muscles and and toes? there seems to be some inconsistency with the stuff he chooses to exaggerate.
 
haha, the intellectual dishonesty is going to make me barf. surely breasts have never been a sexual symbol!

surely not!

Aku said it best: being intentionally thick, dishonest, and unnecessarily obtuse is what drives the discussion. You're not stupid; don't talk to your fellow GAFers like they are.
 
Breasts aren't a sexual organ last time I checked. But maybe I've been doing stuff wrong this whole time.

This isn't really true. There's a definite sexual appeal to breasts. There's a point in making them more revealing and big. That being said the issue here is lacking nuance and taking all sexual objectification at face value. It doesn't work that way with artistic renderings ever unless of course the character in question or the intentions really are that flat.
 
so the artist is just exaggerating muscles and breasts? why not muscles and hands? or muscles and and toes? there seems to be some inconsistency with the stuff he chooses to exaggerate.

Because artists generally enjoy creative freedom, and that's what the artists produced. Perhaps you should take your crusade to other artists like Tom Wessellman as well. (Perhaps NSFW, even though he's a famous and renowned artist)
 

Ferrio

Banned
so the artist is just exaggerating muscles and breasts? why not muscles and hands? or muscles and and toes? there seems to be some inconsistency with the stuff he chooses to exaggerate.

Or he could of given them all bobbleheads, GENIUS! I don't see how any of the stuff you mentioned relates to the topic. So if she had really big hands it'd be okay with you?

God this is my second post in this thread and I'm already regretting joining.

This isn't really true. There's a definite sexual appeal to breasts. There's a point in making them more revealing and big. That being said the issue here is lacking nuance and taking all sexual objectification at face value. It doesn't work that way with artistic renderings ever unless of course the character in question or the intentions really are that flat.

I didn't say there wasn't sexual appeal, but it's not a sexual organ. Tons of non-sexual organ parts have sexual appeal. Comparing it to a penis is silly, Q's quote about camel toes would be more in line.
 
Whoa, slow your horses. Read above.

I don't see anything in your post justifying (or, indeed, remotely related to) that "you should be better than this" attitude. I don't care about people understanding you or not, you have no right to hold any of the posters here to any previous standard you have for them, imagined or real.
 

Eusis

Member
This game/character is a terrible pulpit to use as your crowning example of sexual objectification of women in video games. I wish people would stop.
I thought the armor design for the Divinity: Original Sin female lead that was shown when the Kickstarter started was a better example, Dragon's Crown is so exaggerated all over the place that it's hard to take seriously anyway, but Divinity seems to be more serious and likely story centric with more realistic character designs, so skimpy, impractical armor sticks out badly.
 

Metrotab

Banned
haha, the intellectual dishonesty is going to make me barf. surely breasts have never been a sexual symbol!

surely not!

Aku said it best: being intentionally thick, dishonest, and unnecessarily obtuse is what drives the discussion. You're not stupid; don't talk to your fellow GAFers like they are.

Is there something wrong with exaggerating sexual symbols?

EDIT: And thanks for the insults.
 

Haly

One day I realized that sadness is just another word for not enough coffee.
so the artist is just exaggerating muscles and breasts? why not muscles and hands? or muscles and and toes? there seems to be some inconsistency with the stuff he chooses to exaggerate.
Breasts: Secondary female sex characteristic
Musculature: Secondary male sex charcateristic

Kamitani exaggerating hands and arms (within the game):
Kamitani exaggerating feet (another game);
 
I thought armor design for the Divinity: Original Sin female lead that was shown when the Kickstarter started was a better example, Dragon's Crown is so exaggerated all over the place that it's hard to take seriously anyway, but Divinity seems to be more serious and likely story centric with more realistic character designs, so skimpy, impractical armor sticks out badly.

Exactly. Or the constant skimpy ass armor for female characters in MMOs versus dudes being completely covered up. Then the excuse is "it's fantasy." Oh it's only fantasy in regards to the recreations of the female characters, uhuh. They have mystical invisible armor that keeps arrows away from their thighs, ass, chest and mid-drift. Although I don't really like Tera's solution where everyone looks like a stripper.
 

QisTopTier

XisBannedTier
haha, the intellectual dishonesty is going to make me barf. surely breasts have never been a sexual symbol!

surely not!
No one said they are not sexually appealing, people are saying they are not on par with dick in sexual levels and no they are not.

As I said if they showed camel toes then yeah sure go for bulging packages
 
Top Bottom