mescalineeyes
Banned
With all this hoobla, you guys do realize that Apple hasn't yet come out and called it a Retina display... or even confirmed that the iPad we are going to see will have double the resolution.
I haven't been this confident in a big feature pre-reveal from Apple in a long time. The invite photo practically reveals it.With all this hoobla, you guys do realize that Apple hasn't yet come out and called it a Retina display... or even confirmed that the iPad we are going to see will have double the resolution.
With all this hoobla, you guys do realize that Apple hasn't yet come out and called it a Retina display... or even confirmed that the iPad we are going to see will have double the resolution.
Mmmm. Does the iPad 1/2 already work as a kind of remote for the current Apple TV? Maybe they're trying to make it a big deal, where the iPad becomes the world's best TV remote... (which it clearly won't be, until you can feel for buttons without looking... ohh yeah there's me linking it to haptics again)
Haha. Don't worry, I'm all prepared for no haptic touch. I'm just trying to make sense of the wording.
You heard it here first folks. Following the "retina" guidelines set forth by Refrigerator, A 50" HDTV needs be 13K resolution, 13,440 x 7560 to be exact, in order to reach that holy grail of 300+ PPI and attain the coveted retina class. So infuriating that these TV companies stick to keeping their screens at less than 60 PPI! Viewing distance has no say in the matter!
This is true, and hopefully there are behind-the-scenes agitations amongst the senior staff to not classify this device as having a Retina Display. That is my hope, at least.With all this hoobla, you guys do realize that Apple hasn't yet come out and called it a Retina display... or even confirmed that the iPad we are going to see will have double the resolution.
Why would I care about having a Retina-class Display for my large-screen Television? I only want these Retina-level PPI for hand-held devices, like a phone or tablet. Congrats(?) though, for working my name into a ridiculous premise that you easily dismissed in one fell swoop.
This is true, and hopefully there are behind-the-scenes agitations amongst the senior staff to not classify this device as having a Retina Display. That is my hope, at least.
You kinda answered your own question there...Why would you need to feel buttons? Apple tv's default remote only has 1 button on it as is.
Its retarded logic, one you cant reason with. If Apple named the display jigga display, it still wouldnt impact the end user experience, sales or anything else worthwhile.Honestly, what does it matter if they call it retina or not. The ipad 3 will still be the ipad 3, no matter what silly marketing term they use. It seems a silly thing to get annoyed by. The resolution will be double the previous, just like with the iphone 4/S, because that is what works.
Honestly, what does it matter if they call it retina or not. The ipad 3 will still be the ipad 3, no matter what silly marketing term they use. It seems a silly thing to get annoyed by. The resolution will be double the previous, just like with the iphone 4/S, because that is what works.
This is true, and hopefully there are behind-the-scenes agitations amongst the senior staff to not classify this device as having a Retina Display. That is my hope, at least.
Why would I care about having a Retina-class Display for my large-screen Television? I only want these Retina-level PPI for hand-held devices, like a phone or tablet. Congrats(?) though, for working my name into a ridiculous premise that you easily dismissed in one fell swoop.
This is true, and hopefully there are behind-the-scenes agitations amongst the senior staff to not classify this device as having a Retina Display. That is my hope, at least.
There were various arguments about Retina even before I entered in it, yet for some reason everyone coalesced on my view as heretical. As I wrote before I'm still buying the device. I just have an opinion on it regardless.
Retarded logic. Going 'full retard.' God bless you all for not having anyone in your immediate family/sphere with mental retardation.
No, your view is simply incorrect.There were various arguments about Retina even before I entered in it, yet for some reason everyone coalesced on my view as heretical.
If you meant 'true retina', your view is also incorrect.So we all know the display isn't rue retina. I'm wondering if the senseg haptic will also, not have retina resolution.
Mmmm. Does the iPad 1/2 already work as a kind of remote for the current Apple TV? Maybe they're trying to make it a big deal, where the iPad becomes the world's best TV remote... (which it clearly won't be, until you can feel for buttons without looking... ohh yeah there's me linking it to haptics again)
Haha. Don't worry, I'm all prepared for no haptic touch. I'm just trying to make sense of the wording.
That's absurd. Why would I think like that? If they'd done that, I'd simply be expecting a new iPad with a new display like everyone else.Maybe the better way to look at it would be if they hadn't added 'and touch' line (and no finger). Then you'd be all, "OMG, they didn't mention touch, maybe they're removing the touch screen! Why would it only be something you see? OMG"
That's absurd. Why would I think like that? If they'd done that, I'd simply be expecting a new iPad with a new display like everyone else.
There would be no problem to remove the mention of touch. It would make more sense. I am questioning why they felt they had to add it in, because it makes less sense.
It's certainly a possiblity, yes.because they are referring to two products.
This is true, and hopefully there are behind-the-scenes agitations amongst the senior staff to not classify this device as having a Retina Display. That is my hope, at least.
That's absurd. Why would I think like that? If they'd done that, I'd simply be expecting a new iPad with a new display like everyone else.
There would be no problem to remove the mention of touch. It would make more sense. I am questioning why they felt they had to add it in, because it makes less sense.
Idk how past apple products went but when, if they allow reservations when should I be able to reserve them. And could I buy two?
Pretty good probability of getting a new one this year.Can we expect a new iphone within a year, or two? I plan on keeping my 3gs for another year. I wonder how different the iphone a year from now will be compared to the one I now have.
So it seems like this will be branded as iPad HD
![]()
I think the main reason they wont name it iPad hd is simple: it's tacky as hell.
Not to mention its above hd resolution and all that nonsense.
So is 3G. Didnt stop Apple.I think the main reason they wont name it iPad hd is simple: it's tacky as hell.
Not to mention its above hd resolution and all that nonsense.
What do you mean? That isnt mine.I remember making fake lists for E3 2011.
So is 3G. Didnt stop Apple.
So it seems like this will be branded as iPad HD
![]()
I doubt Apple cares, like I said earlier. Dont think the name is going to have any impact at all.No way. The term 3G isn't being used to to sell sunglasses in late night informercials.
No way. The term 3G isn't being used to to sell sunglasses in late night informercials.
If you meant 'true retina', your view is also incorrect.
The term 3G (and now 4G) was used to sell tacky phones to clueless consumers.
That is certainly sensible. And I'm very sure they're deliberately hinting at haptics whether it's gonna be there or not.My point is, you should just take it at face value. These graphics have hardly ever been as cryptically revealing as viewers have wanted them to be or examined them as. They always SEEM like they're carrying a message because 1) Internet fanboys are bored, and 2) they WANT people to speculate and build hype. Beyond that, there typically isn't much in it.
Beyond the retina, I'm not sure there is much meant to be conveyed from the image. And in my opinion, this is one of the worst Apple has done, because I hate that damn photo(shop).
Wat.The only view that is incorrect is the one missing a few PPI.
So it seems like this will be branded as iPad HD
![]()
I think the main reason they wont name it iPad hd is simple: it's tacky as hell.
Not to mention its above hd resolution and all that nonsense.
I haven't been this confident in a big feature pre-reveal from Apple in a long time. The invite photo practically reveals it.