DouglasteR
Member
Great !
But..... wheres the VR support ?
But..... wheres the VR support ?
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Fallout 4: PS4 Pro & PC High-Res support detailed
- Thread starter shinobi602
- Start date
BLUElightCory
Member
Kind of wishing I bought it on PS4 instead of XBO right now. Roll on Scorpio...
VincentMatts
Member
Yeah but im sure scorpio will get an update too. Bethesda was in that scorpio announcement video so id expect one.
Looks like they removed the RX 490 recommendation on their post.
But still, it says that to utilize the texture pack one should MEET or EXCEED a goddamn GTX 1080. I really hope they're having a laugh because if they're serious then only a very small percentage of people will be able to use those textures.
I've got a 5820K with hyper-threading disabled and a GTX 1070, so I will be very curious how it'll run.
Also happy to finally see PS4 Pro support, can't wait to try that out too.
But still, it says that to utilize the texture pack one should MEET or EXCEED a goddamn GTX 1080. I really hope they're having a laugh because if they're serious then only a very small percentage of people will be able to use those textures.
I've got a 5820K with hyper-threading disabled and a GTX 1070, so I will be very curious how it'll run.
Also happy to finally see PS4 Pro support, can't wait to try that out too.
Anyone?
You have to ask Bethesda since they didn't state anything.
Nobody here can give you a proper answer.
Vulcano's assistant
Banned
Let's just pack these texture files raw brah
hogendaz85
Member
Pretty sure it's going to be a separate game not a patch.
Mister Wolf
Member
Guess I could give this game another spin.
Well, maybe 22-27 fps might be more in line with Bethesda's past work.
Regginator
Member
LelouchZero
Member
Wow a High-Resolution texture pack for PC is soo awesome, thanks Bethesda!
VincentMatts
Member
They should put "less chop" in the patch notes
While there's nothing definitive, Skyrim Remastered has supersampling, and you can count the number of Pro games that don't support supersampling on one hand, so the chances are pretty good that supersampling will be there for 1080p players.
But this is also Bethesda and Sony, so nothing is certain.
Trogdor1123
Gold Member
No lol, that's for the high res which is on PC. Can't wait to fire it back up
Hyrule Warrior
Member
Would have preferred enhanced frame rate. It was dogshit when I played it on PS4 initially.
IcyRhythms
Member
LMAO
There is now way in hell that extra 60GB is worth the bandwidth. No fucking way. Game still runs like shit on PC in certain areas of the game, regardless of hardware.
There is now way in hell that extra 60GB is worth the bandwidth. No fucking way. Game still runs like shit on PC in certain areas of the game, regardless of hardware.
family_guy
Member
Maybe they meant an extra 5.8 GB?
I get a perfect 60fps @ 1080p on Ultra, and I'm very eager to see what an additionnal 60GB of textures looks like..
Dishonored 2 is a Bethesda game too and it's one of the few games with lack of supersampling.
And I asked many times about the missing support for 1080p users to developers or to Bethesda official accounts... but they ignored the feedback everytime.
So I'm hoping this is a Skyrim scenario and not a Dishonored one...
They are most likely entirely uncompressed, it's Bethesda
Jack The Nipper
Banned
So pro doesn't get the textures? Wonder if Scorpio will?
Dishonored 2 is a different studio though.
You'll get your answer next week, unless Bethesda gives an update.
Felix Lighter
Member
These textures better be like nothing I have ever seen in a game before. Holy shit at the VRAM, CPU and storage requirements.
CertifiedFP
Member
58 gigabytes of the original textures upscaled to 40k.
Even with SLI support I remember having to spend a couple hours tweaking this game to get a solid 60fps @1440 w/ two EVGA 970 FTWs. 58gigs of textures will not be kind to 95% of pc rigs out there is my guess.
My next GPU will be the AMD vega (depending on VRAM #) or the 1080ti. I might have a chance at 30fps with 58gigs worth of textures holy shit...
My next GPU will be the AMD vega (depending on VRAM #) or the 1080ti. I might have a chance at 30fps with 58gigs worth of textures holy shit...
Hope your right.
Deaf Spacker
Memb
My 6700K @ 4.6GHz and SLI 1070's should plough through this.
PowerThroughLov
Member
Honestly, I could see a 58GB high res texture pack as real. 5.8GB seems far too small.
Textures do make up ~70% of a game these days.
Im all far it. If you dont want it dont use it. I prefer they go all out than not at all.
Textures do make up ~70% of a game these days.
Im all far it. If you dont want it dont use it. I prefer they go all out than not at all.
Chris_Rivera
Member
Sounds like a true HD/4K texture pack. I guess people expect a variety of different HD texture packs, based on their unique config and ISP.
SliChillax
Member
Aw man, couldn't they have told us this earlier? I just finished an entire playthrough for the second time on PC, not going back again.
IcyRhythms
Member
Yeah. There's at least one, usually. Always somebody in every PC thread claiming they have no issues. They could have similar or the same setups as others in the thread, and somehow no issues. lol
joecanada
Member
Recommended PC Specs
Windows 7/8/10 (64-bit OS required)
Intel Core i7-5820K or better
GTX 1080 8GB
8GB+ Ram
58 gigs
Loking forward to see what that looks like in 4 years!
guess I wasted that money on i5 6500 and GTX 1060 lol.
But they are just textures, at worst shouldn't it only need more Vram?
So no clarification if 58GB is the actual textures yet?
Just checked my fallout 4 folder, it's only 39GB. I have mods installed so I don't know if that's the real size. But if they mean't 58GB will be the game+textures that would mean the textures are 19GB, which I think is still too big. If its 58GB for just the textures that will make the games footprint 97GB! I think that's almost the size of Flight simulator with all its DLC.
Then again, the Skyrim HD mod is only around 2GB and that's the full resolution version which is 4k textures. But I don't think it replaced all textures. IMO they forgot the period and mean't 5.8GB. If I'm wrong...then my god how will the game look with 19/58GB of high resolution textures!?! My eyes are ready!
Just checked my fallout 4 folder, it's only 39GB. I have mods installed so I don't know if that's the real size. But if they mean't 58GB will be the game+textures that would mean the textures are 19GB, which I think is still too big. If its 58GB for just the textures that will make the games footprint 97GB! I think that's almost the size of Flight simulator with all its DLC.
Then again, the Skyrim HD mod is only around 2GB and that's the full resolution version which is 4k textures. But I don't think it replaced all textures. IMO they forgot the period and mean't 5.8GB. If I'm wrong...then my god how will the game look with 19/58GB of high resolution textures!?! My eyes are ready!