• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The UK votes to leave the European Union |OUT2| Mayday, Mayday, I've lost an ARM

Status
Not open for further replies.

Xando

Member
oh okay so I found an unblocked version of the story and it's not quite as sensational as the title. Basically an FT analysis has rolled together every liability the UK has within the EU and come up with an estimate but acknowledges there's flexibility in the negotiations.



the way people report this "brexit bill" really gets me because it's always met with such certainty by some but it never comes with an explanation.
I guess "EU wants 100bn Brexit bill" sells better than "EU asks for xx but is willing to negotiate"
Sorry may be a stupid question but doesn't that mean the Ukraine and Portugal will owe money to the UK. In order to pay the loan back?

At this one moment I want the UK to say yes we will pay €100bn but ask for an audit of all the EU finances. Just to see what the EU would say ...
Yes. According to the article after these loans are repaid the actual bill would be between 65-75bln
 

Empty

Member
eu going rough on the size of bill is going to make it politically impossible for may to pay an appropriate fee and move on to other matters. the perception that the eu27 is ganging up to rip britain off will overwhelm any other concerns, the papers will go ballistic.
 

Kyougar

Member
eu going rough on the size of bill is going to make it politically impossible for may to pay an appropriate fee and move on to other matters. the perception that the eu27 is ganging up to rip britain off will overwhelm any other concerns, the papers will go ballistic.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

why should the EU care what some papers in the UK are writing? The UK WANTS and NEEDS a good deal.
A UK-EU trade deal is just another deal to be made in the next 1 or 2 decades for the EU like all the deals that were made in the last 2 decades. And all the dozen deals that are currently in the pipeline.

Where does this delusional self importance from the UK come from? The EU doesnt care what some nutjob papers are writing. Or do you think they lose sleep over what nutjob papers in Turkey, Russia, Marocco, USA, Japan, China, Egypt, etc. etc. write?
The only thing is: The UK papers already were dissing the EU while in the Union itself, so what does it change?

May is calling a GE not because it would give her a better negotiation position, but because she needs argument, that the PEOPLE wanted the next 30 lost years. The people know what voting May brings. So when the country tanks she can shrug and say it was the will of the people and not from an unelected PM.
 

oti

Banned
UK will not pay 100 billion euro EU exit bill, says Brexit minister
https://t.co/BrNkFexGqn

Britain will not be paying 100 billion euros ($109.20 billion) to leave the European Union, Brexit minister David Davis said on Wednesday after the Financial Times reported that the EU was preparing to demand that amount.

We'll not be paying 100 billion. What we've got to do is discuss in detail what the rights and obligations are," Davis told British channel ITV.

Japanese companies sure must feel great about their investments.
 

Walshicus

Member
Sorry may be a stupid question but doesn't that mean the Ukraine and Portugal will owe money to the UK. In order to pay the loan back?

At this one moment I want the UK to say yes we will pay €100bn but ask for an audit of all the EU finances. Just to see what the EU would say ...

Lol. Please tell me you don't actually believe that whole audit BS the papers here spew?
 

8bit

Knows the Score
Theresa May says the European Commission has hardened its negotiating stance "to affect the result of the general election"

Video: https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/859783194790330368

From the guardian :

Strong and Stable robot said:
Whoever wins on 8 June will face one overriding task: to get the best possible deal for this United Kingdom from Brexit.

And in the last few days, we have seen just how tough these talks are likely to be.

Britain's negotiating position in Europe has been misrepresented in the continental press.

The European commission's negotiating stance has hardened.

Threats against Britain have been issued by European politicians and officials.

All of these acts have been deliberately timed to affect the result of the general election that will take place on 8 June.

By contrast, I made clear in my letter to the president of the European council invoking Article 50 last month that, in leaving the European Union, Britain means no harm to our friends and allies on the continent.

We continue to believe that no deal is better for Britain than a bad deal.

But we want a deal. We want a deep and special partnership with the European Union.

And we want the EU to succeed.

But the events of the last few days have shown that - whatever our wishes, and however reasonable the positions of Europe's other leaders - there are some in Brussels who do not want these talks to succeed.

Who do not want Britain to prosper.

So now more than ever we need to be led by a prime minister and a government that is strong and stable.

Because making Brexit a success is central to our national interest. And it is central to your own security and prosperity.

Because while there is enormous opportunity for Britain as we leave the European Union, if we do not get this right, the consequences will be serious.

And they will be felt by ordinary, working people across the country.

This Brexit negotiation is central to everything.



"Britain's negotiating position in Europe has been misrepresented in the continental press."

Amazing.
 

KingSnake

The Birthday Skeleton
Because while there is enormous opportunity for Britain as we leave the European Union, if we do not get this right, the consequences will be serious.

I thought that just by electing May everything is guaranteed. So what now? You say there is a possibility for everything to crumble? What about that stability?
 
Understand, as far as "conventional" EU politicians go, the ideal would be for the UK to sink under the waves as soon as Brexit finishes. Nothing personal, but that is what you've voted for, for the UK misfortune to be mainstream EU politicians gain.

A living example of just what it means to leave the EU.

They probably won't push for it, because "sink the UK" is actually hard to do, and there are negatives to the EU from it, but for the politicians facing challenges from "Brexit" opponents, a live example would do swell...

I'm not optimistic at all, I expect no deal and both sides getting what they truly want, a scapegoat on the other side for why things aren't doing as well as they should.

Still, your newspapers have been blaming the EU for everything for who knows how long now, what's good for the goose is good for the gander, as the English say, yes?
 

Kinan

Member
Theresa May says the European Commission has hardened its negotiating stance "to affect the result of the general election"

Video: https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/859783194790330368

To achieve what exactly? I do not think that many in Europe actually care about your general election. There is no "good" option for EU, UK is leaving whatever the election results are. We just want someone sensible at the negotiation table, and May is probably as good as it gets nowadays in Britain. The election was your idea, May, noone in Europe ever called for one.
 

oti

Banned
"No! I'm not delusional! The EU doesn't want me to win the election! Yeah! That's it! Vote for me!"

Seriously, guys. Is there no pushback to this ridiculous narrative?
 

Xando

Member
Britain’s negotiating position in Europe has been misrepresented in the continental press.
200.webp
 

Beefy

Member
Said this on the other thread but it should be posted here really:

The Tory's have already stealth brought in a new rule for the long term sick. If you need a sick note after being signed off for more then 6 months. Doctors will have to question you each month, for you to get another note. Even if you have therapy notes sent to them.

I had it today were I had to tell the doc everything I have been through with my abuse etc. Even though they get my notes every week. So not a good day for me today.
 
Said this on the other thread but it should be posted here really:

The Tory's have already stealth brought in a new rule for the long term sick. If you need a sick note after being signed off for more then 6 months. Doctors will have to question you each month, for you to get another note. Even if you have therapy notes sent to them.

I had it today were I had to tell the doc everything I have been through with my abuse etc. Even though they get my notes every week. So not a good day for me today.

shit, sorry about that Beefy :(
 
Said this on the other thread but it should be posted here really:

The Tory's have already stealth brought in a new rule for the long term sick. If you need a sick note after being signed off for more then 6 months. Doctors will have to question you each month, for you to get another note. Even if you have therapy notes sent to them.

I had it today were I had to tell the doc everything I have been through with my abuse etc. Even though they get my notes every week. So not a good day for me today.

Tory bastards.Can't ever leave people alone.
 

Dougald

Member
Said this on the other thread but it should be posted here really:

The Tory's have already stealth brought in a new rule for the long term sick. If you need a sick note after being signed off for more then 6 months. Doctors will have to question you each month, for you to get another note. Even if you have therapy notes sent to them.

I had it today were I had to tell the doc everything I have been through with my abuse etc. Even though they get my notes every week. So not a good day for me today.

Every month? I'm really sorry to hear that

Even discounting feelings and looking at cold hard facts, surely forcing everyone on long-term sick to make a monthly doctors appointment costs the NHS more money than we can possibly save catching a statistically insignificant number of people playing the system


"We want a deep and special partnership with the European Union"

Eh...you had one????

Yeah the British public wants that again, just without contributing anything back in any way
 

Beefy

Member
Every month? I'm really sorry to hear that

Even discounting feelings and looking at cold hard facts, surely forcing everyone on long-term sick to make a monthly doctors appointment costs the NHS more money than we can possibly save catching a statistically insignificant number of people playing the system

Yeah the British public wants that again, just without contributing anything back in any way

Yep every month, I am still waiting to get on ESA properly. Until I have my ESA medical I have to send in medical notes and now have to do the month sit down crap, even though I am having therapy. I have been waiting 6 months to get on ESA properly, but have been told it could take a year + to have a medical.
 

Xando

Member
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/may/03/the-six-brexit-traps-that-will-defeat-theresa-may

Interesting piece from Varoufakis.

As a Remainer, I have always had doubts about the EU, and this certainly doesn't help those (iirc Varoufakis led/leads a group to campaign for EU reform, rather than demolition). But it also highlights how the Leave position is almost in utter poverty.

I'm not sure anyone should listen to a word Varoufakis says after the disaster he got greece into.

Not only did he get a worse deal than originally offered by the EU he also implemented capital controls and fucked the economy even harder with his "game theory" bs.
 

Ghost

Chili Con Carnage!
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/may/03/the-six-brexit-traps-that-will-defeat-theresa-may

Interesting piece from Varoufakis.

As a Remainer, I have always had doubts about the EU, and this certainly doesn't help those (iirc Varoufakis led/leads a group to campaign for EU reform, rather than demolition). But it also highlights how the Leave position is almost in utter poverty.

Thanks that's a really interesting read and you can see a lot of the tactics already in action. It's a shame that the Leave argument about the EU being a bureaucratic nightmare couldn't be more successfully demonstrated by the remain camp to mean that a leave vote was such a shitty idea.


Xando said:
I'm not sure anyone should listen to a word Varoufakis says after the disaster he got greece into.

Not only did he get a worse deal than originally offered by the EU he also implemented capital controls and fucked the economy even harder with his "game theory" bs.

His suggested solution here of asking for a Norway deal and punting the real negotiations 7 years down the road definitely wouldn't work but I'd say his description of the way the EU machine was designed to work against him, and the way it will work against the UK as well, rings very true.
 

Theonik

Member
I'm not sure anyone should listen to a word Varoufakis says after the disaster he got greece into.

Not only did he get a worse deal than originally offered by the EU he also implemented capital controls and fucked the economy even harder with his "game theory" bs.
Like or dislike him, what he said in this piece rings absolutely true and is how May will be played here. Ultimately in the way that Greece could not really accept a deal that doesn't offer debt relief, May needs a deal that addresses trade or at least provides a schedule for trade. The EU's approach is to use the fact they control the clock to push their agenda first saying they will discuss your items but only after they get their way first knowing full well that they can delay you into accepting, and if not they can just get more time.

This ultimately boils down to leverage too. The sense that Greece's case is incomparable of course is that the UK is in this dire situation entirely of their own making, whereas Greece was thrust into a situation that they had no recourse but to follow that path.

His suggested solution here of asking for a Norway deal and punting the real negotiations 7 years down the road definitely wouldn't work but I'd say his description of the way the EU machine was designed to work against him, and the way it will work against the UK as well, rings very true.
It would never be agreeable yes. Whole situation is pretty dumb.
 

Xando

Member
His suggested solution here of asking for a Norway deal and punting the real negotiations 7 years down the road definitely wouldn't work but I'd say his description of the way the EU machine was designed to work against him, and the way it will work against the UK as well, rings very true.

His whole argument is that the EU is a undemocratic institution which is BS.

Juncker is elected, the council is full of democratic elected heads of states even barnier was appointed by a democratic parliament.

His whole argument falls apart because he was demanding stuff that was available for the other member states (similiar to may demanding things that aren't on the table).

Varoufakis (and May) don't seem to realize that the EU is not one brain but 27 different brains and each have different interests at heart.

It's ironic that he complains that the EU was working against him when even germany was willing to compromise(due to heavy lobbying by france) on a Greece deal which fell apart because varoufakis thought he is the king of the castle and the member states have to follow his lead.

This guy is more concerned with selling books rather than a realistic compromise.

At best he's a dreamer, at worst he's a idiot.

The UK should look at Greece as a example of how not to do negotiations because their demands were so unrealistic for other member states that they decided it was either take the deal that is available or jump off a cliff.

Like or dislike him, what he said in this piece rings absolutely true and is how May will be played here. Ultimately in the way that Greece could not really accept a deal that doesn't offer debt relief, May needs a deal that addresses trade or at least provides a schedule for trade. The EU's approach is to use the fact they control the clock to push their agenda first saying they will discuss your items but only after they get their way first knowing full well that they can delay you into accepting, and if not they can just get more time.

This ultimately boils down to leverage too. The sense that Greece's case is incomparable of course is that the UK is in this dire situation entirely of their own making, whereas Greece was thrust into a situation that they had no recourse but to follow that path.

Well that is how negotiation works. You try to get the best deal possible for your people. If you have leverage you'll have better chances of getting a good outcome. If not you either accept what is available or you jump off a cliff.

What he (and May) don't realize is that no matter how big your mandate is it doesn't influence the decision of the other countries.
 

*Splinter

Member
His suggested solution here of asking for a Norway deal and punting the real negotiations 7 years down the road definitely wouldn't work but I'd say his description of the way the EU machine was designed to work against him, and the way it will work against the UK as well, rings very true.
I don't doubt that something as large and complex as the EU is a beaurocratic mess, but when he tries to claim its that way by design it sounds more like a conspiracy theory to me. Or rather, a misunderstanding of how important he is (or isn't) to the EU.

The rest of the accusations don't seem as sketchy as he tries to make them. The EU tried to influence Tsipras to get around this guy... Yeah? That's politics? That's on Tsipras to be not so easily influenced.

etc. Maybe I'm excusing too much. Would be interested in a neutral parties opinion on the plan he submitted to the EU and was supposedly ignored, but I don't suppose such a thing is available?

Oh and his argument about the EU being anti-democratic... He explains why he's wrong, then dismisses the explanation because ?
 
I don't disagree that the EU is a bit of a "not quite good enough solutions" engine, that a "proper" solution for the Greek (and others) crisis could be achieved if only everyone worked towards the optimum solution.

OTOH, has he ever met humans? And if so, when exactly did they ever work towards the optimum solution, and not the best solution for them?
 
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/may/03/the-six-brexit-traps-that-will-defeat-theresa-may

Interesting piece from Varoufakis.

As a Remainer, I have always had doubts about the EU, and this certainly doesn't help those (iirc Varoufakis led/leads a group to campaign for EU reform, rather than demolition). But it also highlights how the Leave position is almost in utter poverty.
Great article. It certainly didn't help to change my mind that we will just leave and suffer an economic dip for a couple of decades.
Germany and a few of the other stronger economies will be largely unaffected ,however I wonder how some of the more troubled countries will weather a storm or if Germany will help them if needed.
No doubt people will tell me that all EU members will be fine and weak little Britain is too insignificant to affect the Portuguese economy or trade barriers will be good for Spanish and Irish agriculture etc.
We often get the " but German cars " thrown about but that is a behemoth of an industry world wide and quite frankly a bullshit leave argument.
I have no idea what's going to happen , I'm not really sure many people really do.
 

KingSnake

The Birthday Skeleton
Varoufakis and Tsipras managed to fuck up an already complicated situation and negotiation. They threaten with a revolution and ended up with a worse deal than the one that was offered initially to them (which funnily enough will also be the situation with UK). Any advice that Varoufakis gives in terms of negotiations should be thrown directly in the bin.
 
I think the biggest problem with Varoufakis is that he doesn't understand politics. He is probably a very good, maybe even brilliant, economist, but he doesn't understand the reality of politics. He thinks that all he has to do is showing data and then "common sense" (whatever he considers common sense from his POV) will prevail. It doesn't work that way, atleast not always. He ignored the personal level, too. He pissed off so many people in the EU (very similar to May right now) and that made it very difficult for those people to accept a reasonable deal because they'd be seen as weak in their respective country of origin.
I do think he could have made a difference (for the good that is), but his approach should have been way more cautious for that to happen. I still remember how at the beginning he (and Tsipras? Can't quite remember) tried to form some kind coalition with the other Southern countries, which didn't work out at all and just made the situation much worse for Greece.
 

Funky Papa

FUNK-Y-PPA-4
I don't have a strong opinion about Varoufakis, but people should keep in mind that individual member states actively campaigned to fuck him and Greece over in order to stop an uprising of similar parties across Europe.

Spain's Rajoy in particular lobbied like a motherfucker for the harshest possible deal in order to hit Podemos by proxy since it's ideologically close to Syriza and it was a seen as a menace to a political duopoly extremely similar to that of Greece. It didn't work out, but it inflicted a lot of needless pain on Greece.

A number of actors piled on Greece in bad faith during the worst part of the crisis in order to push their own interests. The EU was in disarray at that time. Lots of member states were scared of a possible contagion. It was a trying time for the Union and Greece never had a chance.
 

Uzzy

Member
I doubt there are many people around who have active experience of negotiating with the EU and the tactics the EU use, and fewer still who are free to give their accounts of what happened. So Varoufakis' article is interesting for that, if nothing else.
 

Theonik

Member
I don't disagree with anything in your post. What you seem to be ignoring however is that this is not a situation that is in any way workable. In the first place this should be a negotiation between two parties, in Greece's case there should be a common interest for the union itself. To allow that to turn into the political pettiness of 27 different administrations is exactly why Greece's situation is completely unsolvable. Negotiations only work when both parties are acting in good faith.
 

Irminsul

Member
OTOH, has he ever met humans? And if so, when exactly did they ever work towards the optimum solution, and not the best solution for them?
Maybe he thinks game theory models how actual human beings work all of the time.

Also, I don't get his premise in that article. Of course a stronger mandate doesn't really matter that much for May -- because it's still hers against the 27 others. And Varoufakis does nothing to argue against that point. He just claims that democratic mandates in general don't count in the EU, but doesn't deliver any bit of evidence.
 

barber

Member
Maybe he thinks game theory models how actual human beings work all of the time.

Also, I don't get his premise in that article. Of course a stronger mandate doesn't really matter that much for May -- because it's still hers against the 27 others. And Varoufakis does nothing to argue against that point. He just claims that democratic mandates in general don't count in the EU, but doesn't deliver any bit of evidence.

Yeah it is kinda hard to get his point where in the first paragraph he points to that problem ("You have a mandate? I do too!!") and then just goes to say that it is undemocratic.Why should your mandate be given more importance than the other parties mandates in that instance?
It is true that some of the problems are from local parties trying to force better situations for them back home (like our president Rajoy) but that is how democracy in this union work, you have to deal with the different countries as they can veto.
 

KingSnake

The Birthday Skeleton
Another issue with Varoufakis (which seems to happen also with May) is that he doesn't understand that if you publicly attack the people with whom you negotiate you can't really expect good will from them afterwards. And if you don't have good will and if you don't have leverage you have nothing in a negotiation. But hey, you gained a couple of popularity points.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom