Good riddance if just cause dies.Happy for them, but I hope this doesn’t kill Just Cause
Good riddance if just cause dies.Happy for them, but I hope this doesn’t kill Just Cause
The irony of places like Era and Reddit and Twitter effectively banning all discussion of it was that the places where it was allowed to exist and be discussed saw improvements in quality of discussion because all the insane blue hairs were too busy silencing themselves and each other. Fate loves irony, or so they say.In silence, since they can't talk about it without being banned
It was good yes.Outside of owning the libs, was this game even that good? Be honest.
It is a PS4/XBO generation Ubisoft checklist game with a half-decent story and decent enough combat system. It should be seen as 7/10 game, but due to it being a beloved property that never had a great video game, the social media mudslinging, and overall attention online, it was oddly elevated to being seen as a potential Game of the Year candidate by many.Outside of owning the libs, was this game even that good? Be honest.
That's Avalanche Studios, lol. Avalanche Software made Hogwarts Legacy and their previous game was Cars 3: Driven to Win.
I think you nailed it. It's not a bad game but it's not great. It's average/decent but all the other factors take it to another level in a way. If it didn't have so much controversy and wasn't based on HP it'd be quickly forgotten.It is a PS4/XBO generation Ubisoft checklist game with a half-decent story and decent enough combat system. It should be seen as 7/10 game, but due to it being a beloved property that never had a great video game, the social media mudslinging, and overall attention online, it was oddly elevated to being seen as a potential Game of the Year candidate by many.
The potential bad cause and effect from this is that more companies might think it's a good thing to politicize their games more or the marketing more, in order to do increase sales figures from stupid controversies.
I'm sensing blue or green hair... confused about their Willies?Uh-oh, someone’s going to rage over this
It's the typical Ubisoft formula open world in the HP universe. Not bad for a first game in a licensed series but the sequel needs to be much better, though.Outside of owning the libs, was this game even that good? Be honest.
It's a great game that was silenced way too quick because of a non existent controversy.Outside of owning the libs, was this game even that good? Be honest.
Gotta agree here even if I love just cause the series as it stands either needs to be rebooted or stay dormant.Good riddance if just cause dies.
Is this really the hill ya'll are willing to die on? Not a good look.Big oof. This ain't it, chief!
really think you're downplaying the fun of running around hogwart's itself. while i tired of the game the further i got from hogwarts, whenever i'd return i'd begin enjoying it all over again. it's one of the more cleverly realized & memorable central areas i've seen playing games...It is a PS4/XBO generation Ubisoft checklist game with a half-decent story and decent enough combat system. It should be seen as 7/10 game, but due to it being a beloved property that never had a great video game, the social media mudslinging, and overall attention online, it was oddly elevated to being seen as a potential Game of the Year candidate by many.
The potential bad cause and effect from this is that more companies might think it's a good thing to politicize their games more or the marketing more, in order to do increase sales figures from stupid controversies.
but it has Sirona Ryan so
its ok now i think
There is A LOT to unpack here....Big oof. This ain't it, chief!
I'm not. The castle itself and the town where you shop for goods(including their secrets) are both the funnest, most creative sections of the game. It's everything else(which takes up for about 70-80% of the game) that's the issue. That 'everything else' is built by-the-numbers in a very Ubisoft way. There's more I can get into regarding the game's problems but I'm being light on it because this is a celebration thread and not a critique thread. I'm simply being as honest as possible to that poster who asked and I don't want to sell him a game that sounds greater than what it actually is.really think you're downplaying the fun of running around hogwart's itself. while i tired of the game the further i got from hogwarts, whenever i'd return i'd begin enjoying it all over again. it's one of the more cleverly realized & memorable central areas i've seen playing games...
And 411 maniaHi ResetEra, Reddit & Tumblr. Glad to see the boycott has worked out for you!
Yep, an awesome open world game that really makes you feel like your living the dream of going to hogwarts. Its a little ubisofty, but they nailed the fantasyFor a first attempt it was a really good fricken job, really enjoyable loyal to the world game.
I came for this and was not disappointed.
Of course it's "vague", there was no such thing as "trans" in the 1800s, when the game takes place.Is there anything in the game itself that says Sirona is trans? I don't recall even the letters fetch quest saying anything concrete, just vagueposting about difficulties growing up and fitting in at Hogwarts. Call her an androgynous (biological) female & lesbian/bi with a really shitty voice actor and all's good.
Outside of owning the libs, was this game even that good? Be honest.
If you are a HP fan then this game is a must-playOutside of owning the libs, was this game even that good?
To be fair to Eurogamer, those 120 purple haired keyboard warriors are the last audience they have left. Normies stopped reading shit on gaming websites 20 years ago. They all watch Youtube and Twitch and TikTok for gaming info now.12million "transphobes" according to those wingnuts over at Ree... Also we'll done Eurogamer for ignoring 12million players because you're scared of 120 purple haired keyboard warriors on twitter... Still makes me angry lol
Someone should make a suicide amount thread with some style: Post this report in a very serious manner congratulating the devs and wishing for more in the future, without mentioning anything about boycott, just in a very normal informative and positive way... Then see fire setIn silence, since they can't talk about it without being banned
Good combat and an amazing realisation of the world dragged down by a boring story and a Ubisoft 'quantity over quality' approach.Outside of owning the libs, was this game even that good? Be honest.
The boycott only served to draw more attention to it. They essentially helped promote the game to a wider audience.The boycott worked!
To quote Stephen Fry: "My only problem with political correctness really, apart from the fact that it's po-faced, sanctimonious, self-righteous occasionally, is that it's not effective. I believe one of the greatest human failings is to prefer to be right than to be effective. And political correctness is always obsessed with how right it is, without thinking of how effective it might be."