Danjin44
The nicest person on this forum
because kratos is bisexual, need i say more?
because kratos is bisexual, need i say more?
Combat was awful in GOW…the changes to the system just never clicked…and man that camera…ugh…Spiderman's combat got boring. God Of War's didn't. I was never bored and I didn't even bother using the BOC much which feel completely different from the Axe.
Yes, boss fights are usually a strong suit of the GoW franchise, now they're gone for some reason? GoW 3 is still the best in this series.I enjoyed Spider-Man more overall, but I've always been a fan of Spider-Man. God of War was still good, but I didn't like the armor system and found the enemies re-used too often, especially boss fights. Spider-Man boss fights weren't exactly amazing, but they were more varied.
Plus in Spider-Man it was fun to just swing around the city. I had fun collecting the backpack items and taking the photos.
You didn't want people to actually say what they liked better you just wanted to put your opinion out and tell people they're wrong lmao. Take the question part out of the titleStill, God of War was significantly worse in all these aspects you're complaining.
Not according to awards and critics, and certainly not to me. RDR2 was a complete borefest compared to GoW, with gameplay design from 20 years ago. One step out of the way = mission failed. And don't start me on the hours of riding your horse to the mission starting points.
God of War was considered by most the best game of 2018, but let's forget about RDR2 and compare it to another Sony game, Spider-man:
- Story and characters = Spider-man story was significantly better and more emotional, God of War was just MacGuffins - The Game to deliver the mother ashes for no special reason.
- Characters = SM had much better written and multidimensional characters, while God of War characters were mostly shallow and one note, Kratos just say "Boy" and cliché tough dad shit all the game. And better not talk about the "character development" thing they tried with Atreus.
- Tranversal = Spider-man has one of the better transversals if not the best of any game, it's so good you might not even want to use fast travel most of the time. God of War was some boring ass backtracking through corridors and you better use fast travel, even with shit loading times (on PS4).
- Combat = Both had very good combat mechanics, i still give the nod to SM, it's just more fun and dynamic, but when you consider things like enemy variety and bosses, it's not even close, Spider-man is magnitudes superior.
- Soundtrack = Tie, both well produced albeit a bit generic, but they're equally competent.
- Graphics = Tie, both among the best of the generation, i prefer SM's setting but it's just a matter of taste.
So, as someone who played both back to back, it's pretty clear Spider-man is a much better game, am i crazy or do i just have shit taste?
What do you mean, you can compare different experiences, the genre of the game means nothing.Both great games but GoW is the best FOR ME. Also they're totally different experiences and comparing them side by side is both subjective and pointless. I mean who's the better, Mario or Zelda ? Halo or Doom ? tsss...
Well... at least you're not crazy.So, as someone who played both back to back, it's pretty clear Spider-man is a much better game, am i crazy or do i just have shit taste?
For me, the #1 thing is fun: Spidey is wayyyy more fun
God of War was considered by most the best game of 2018, but let's forget about RDR2 and compare it to another Sony game, Spider-man:
- Story and characters = Spider-man story was significantly better and more emotional, God of War was just MacGuffins - The Game to deliver the mother ashes for no special reason.
- Characters = SM had much better written and multidimensional characters, while God of War characters were mostly shallow and one note, Kratos just say "Boy" and cliché tough dad shit all the game. And better not talk about the "character development" thing they tried with Atreus.
- Tranversal = Spider-man has one of the better transversals if not the best of any game, it's so good you might not even want to use fast travel most of the time. God of War was some boring ass backtracking through corridors and you better use fast travel, even with shit loading times (on PS4).
- Combat = Both had very good combat mechanics, i still give the nod to SM, it's just more fun and dynamic, but when you consider things like enemy variety and bosses, it's not even close, Spider-man is magnitudes superior.
- Soundtrack = Tie, both well produced albeit a bit generic, but they're equally competent.
- Graphics = Tie, both among the best of the generation, i prefer SM's setting but it's just a matter of taste.
So, as someone who played both back to back, it's pretty clear Spider-man is a much better game, am i crazy or do i just have shit taste?
I really don't understand the 10/10 reviews and hype for GOW. How can you play that long boring Alfheim section and give it a 10/10? The story feels empty with so many of the Norse gods never actually showing up. It's like they were setting up the next game. Combat is better than the average game but nothing special, inferior to GOW3 and miles behind the likes of DMC and other great action games. It's a good game but I was far less impressed with it than I was with GOW3 when that released. GOW3s graphics wowed me a lot more, the combat was better and more visceral and the story was one of the best in the series. GOW3s bosses were way way better.Not according to awards and critics, and certainly not to me. RDR2 was a complete borefest compared to GoW, with gameplay design from 20 years ago. One step out of the way = mission failed. And don't start me on the hours of riding your horse to the mission starting points.