• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

iPhone OS 4 Event - April 8th

Status
Not open for further replies.

sc0la

Unconfirmed Member
So why not just float the ipod controls and shortcut over the top half of the screen (you know, the one that you are already fading out?) when you double click the home button? would seem easier than swiping over to get music controls. :|

EDIT: Unless I guess the whole ipod app rolls into view when you do that. Would make the ipod icon a little superfluous though. Anybody know if that is the default or if they were already in ipod when that screen shot was take?
 

Blackhead

Redarse
LCfiner said:
So beta 3 of 4.0 just came out and some sites are posting screens and details.

here’s a link with details of some changes

http://www.macstories.net/news/iphone-os-4-beta-3-available-first-details/

portrait orientation lock

iPod controls from “sub dock” multitasking UI
4.0 is changing a lot of basic ui stuff and making it more cluttered and complicated :/ . I can already foresee the requests from family and friends to explain whats going on.

It'd be better if the controls pop up on the first dock row when the iPod is playing, instead of having to swipe.

Why would folders have the same background as the multitasking tray?!

It's only beta, lots of time to change it....
 

Alfarif

This picture? uhh I can explain really!
Buckethead said:
Yeah I agree, which is why I thought it would be good for iPad (although their iTunes thing is pretty awesome).

I just thought they could refine it to make it more practical while still looking cool.

I could see it being a better option on the iPad. The screen wouldn't look as cluttered with rating, a search field, and volume controls that fade in and out on the screen.

I haven't read through the entire thread, but am I the only person who thinks the iAd stuff is really REALLY cool?
 

hateradio

The Most Dangerous Yes Man
Charred Greyface said:
4.0 is changing a lot of basic ui stuff and making it more cluttered and complicated :/ . I can already foresee the requests from family and friends to explain whats going on.
I'm sure they will make it easy for people with low tech skills.
 

DarkJC

Member
I liked the old multitasking / folder background much better. It looked like they were going for the 'layer underneath' look.

Glad they added iPod controls back, and screen orientation lock is a nice addition as well.
 

noah111

Still Alive
Tobor said:
I love that cloth texture, good to see it used in the iPhone as well.
Yeah, I don't know tbh. Kinda wish they would have kept the other bg for multitasking (as someone said, gave a 'hidden architecture' type feel) and used the cloth for folders.. oh well though, still looks nice.
 

SnakeXs

about the same metal capacity as a cucumber
So does anyone know if 4.0 makes it possible to do any sort of sleep handshaking type stuff, a la *sigh* Nintendogs? Like to run some sort of app and have it notice if other iPhones around you are running the same app? At the most basic level, imaging all iPhones ran this app, for you to go to work and have the iPhone know that you crossed x other iPhones.

If that makes any sense...
 

numble

Member
Apple patents Facebook integration:
xBOft.jpg

http://www.patentlyapple.com/patent...ow-patent-from-apple-highlights-facebook.html

Next iPhone to ship 24 million, 960x640 resolution, IPS w/ FFS, and 512 mb RAM, according to Taiwan-based DigiTimes.
The new device will adopt IPS (in-plane switching) panels with FFS (fringe-field switching) technology and a 960×640 resolution, Kuo said, noting that LG Display and Prime View International are the panel suppliers.

By incorporating FFS technology, which enables a wider viewing angle and clearer visual quality under in sunlight, Apple is aiming to improve the handset's e-book reader features and promote its iBooks Store. HTC's Hero smartphone has already adopted this technology.

The sharper resolution further widens the gap with Android-based smartphones, which provide 854×480 displays as the highest resolution offerings.

The iPhone 4G will run on the Arm Cortex A8 processor and a 512MB memory module from Samsung Electronics, doubling the memory capacity seen in the iPhone 3GS to take advantage of the multi-tasking capability of the iPhone 4.0 platform, Kuo revealed.

To solve battery life issues, the new iPhone's panel is 33% thinner than in previous iPhone versions to permit more space for larger battery modules supplied by Simplo Technology and Dynapack International Technology, Kuo said.

Roundup of latest rumors:
http://blogs.computerworld.com/16113/24_million_next_gen_iphone_shipping_this_year
 

borghe

Loves the Greater Toronto Area
if true, and if they release a 64GB model, an upgrade is all but assured from me. without a 64GB model though I am not quite 100% sold. still a solid upgrade, but I need double the space WAAAAYYYY more than I need performance upgrades. though god damn that display sound gorgeous.
 
Buckethead said:
960x640 resolution and 512 mb RAM?

i5njnm.jpg


Seriously. And I for one love that FB integration. :D

Any hints of a turn by turn NAV solution from Apple? We used my partner's Droid with the awesome Google NAV a few weeks back in FL and I want.
 

SnakeXs

about the same metal capacity as a cucumber
All that and a front camera?

Ugh, I'm gonna go crazy trying to make money to get one. Can't wait for WWDC.
 
960x640 is a lock, it's been reported by multiple sources, let's hope they don't puss out on the 512.
The price will be interesting. I'm hoping it's no more than $299. I don't care to have any more than 16GB, so yeah.

Besides the 512MB, the only thing I'm still hoping for is that they change that hideous background wallpaper.
 
Buckethead said:
960x640 is a lock, it's been reported by multiple sources, let's hope they don't puss out on the 512.
The price will be interesting. I'm hoping it's no more than $299. I don't care to have any more than 16GB, so yeah.

Besides the 512MB, the only thing I'm still hoping for is that they change that hideous background wallpaper.

Should be customizable ala ipad.
 

RubxQub

φίλω ἐξεχέγλουτον καί ψευδολόγον οὖκ εἰπόν
Sentry said:
960x640? Really? Got damn.
Yep :p

They're smart about it, in that existing apps won't need to release new versions to look good, and new apps can take advantage of the higher resolution.

Higher res screen + front facing camera + A4 processor + increased storage capacity + OS4 = nom nom nom.
 

Stumpokapow

listen to the mad man
Sentry said:
960x640? Really? Got damn.

fkmv0o.png


Isn't that like, a 100% increase? Am I getting this right or am I just stupid?

yes, you're getting it right according to that rumor, except that the resolution of the screen is fit on the same-ish screen size, so it's just a higher pixel density.
 
RubxQub said:
Yep :p

They're smart about it, in that existing apps won't need to release new versions to look good, and new apps can take advantage of the higher resolution.

Higher res screen + front facing camera + A4 processor + increased storage capacity + OS4 = nom nom nom.
This. I really hope the June 7th rumor is spot on.
 

giga

Member
Sentry said:
960x640? Really? Got damn.

[MG]http://i42.tinypic.com/fkmv0o.png[/IMG]

Isn't that like, a 100% increase? Am I getting this right or am I just stupid?
It’s a 400% increase. Your picture clearly illustrates how 4 of the same resolution home screens fit on it.

480*320 = 153600 pixels
960*640 = 614400 pixels
 

borghe

Loves the Greater Toronto Area
Odious Tea said:
This. I really hope the June 7th rumor is spot on.
june 7th release or announcement? release is highly unlikely. I don't think they've ever simultaneously announced and released the iphone. What they have done though is announce it at WWDC and then release it a week or two later. given that the most recently found prototype had no screws and limited seams, it's sounding like it will be the same here.

giga said:
It’s a 400% increase. Your picture clearly illustrates how 4 of the same resolution home screens fit on it.

480*320 = 153600 pixels
960*640 = 614400 pixels
technically he's correct. it's twice the resolution/density... which equates to 4x the pixels. typically when talking resolutions, the percentage increase is referring to perimeter, not area.
 

noah111

Still Alive
giga said:
It’s a 400% increase. Your picture clearly illustrates how 4 of the same resolution home screens fit on it.

480*320 = 153600 pixels
960*640 = 614400 pixels
You're right, in terms of pixel surface area. Doesn't this mean that if we take a screencap of the OS the app icons will be larger than iPad icons? I mean, wtf!

2hy89z.png


Obviously this is on the same size screen, but that amount of pixels must look gorgeous, and that's not even thinking about the apps.
 

cabottemp

Banned
Osietra said:
Beating off to porn on my 4G is going to be even better than the real thing with that ammount of pixels.

God, just thinking about you spanking it made me queef outta my asshole a little bit. Too bad i didn't have a 4G now, with two cameras i DEFINITELY coulda caught that on tape for you.
 
cabot said:
God, just thinking about you spanking it made me queef outta my asshole a little bit. Too bad i didn't have a 4G now, with two cameras i DEFINITELY coulda caught that on tape for you.
Lmao you guys are so gross! :lol

Jobs obviously didn't make the iPhone for you pervs.
 

Wellington

BAAAALLLINNN'
I'm upgrading anyway but @ $399 with 64 Gigs, I'm in no question. At that pricepoint with 32 Gigs, I'll get it but I will complain. :lol

16 Gigs is so restricting. :(
 

bionic77

Member
Is it being revealed June 7 or released?

My contract is up and I am getting whatever they release.

Also, is the RAM going to be 256 or 512?

Going from a 3G to this beast is going to be like upgrading from a PSX to a PS3...

Wellington said:
I'm upgrading anyway but @ $399 with 64 Gigs, I'm in no question. At that pricepoint with 32 Gigs, I'll get it but I will complain. :lol

16 Gigs is so restricting. :(
16 was enough for me.

What did you fill yours up with?
 

flsh

Banned
So a slightly smaller screen (according to leaks), but a huge upgrade in resolution? Seems a bit weird. The screen will probably be so sharp it'll cut our eyes.
If they offer 32GB for a decent price or 64GB (at all) I'm getting this phone. My iPod feels too old and my phone died. It's either this or an HTC Desire and this looks really good.
 

Wellington

BAAAALLLINNN'
bionic77 said:
16 was enough for me.

What did you fill yours up with?
All music my good man, and I have a large portion of my library unchecked so that it does not sync to the phone. Like yourself I'm on a 3G, so I imagine that I'll be taking at least some video.
 

bionic77

Member
Wellington said:
All music my good man, and I have a large portion of my library unchecked so that it does not sync to the phone. Like yourself I'm on a 3G, so I imagine that I'll be taking at least some video.
I don't listen to that much music anymore. I am more of a podcast guy now. I love listening to podcasts about sports, politics, etc. when I am driving for work (which I do a lot of).

I really never use the iPhone camera either, but if it is a little better in the new one I might start using the camera and video more often.
 

borghe

Loves the Greater Toronto Area
bionic77 said:
16 was enough for me.

What did you fill yours up with?
music here also.. my collection is high quality CD rips (not Lossless, but 256K). I have around 8000 songs. As it is I had to pick n choose stuff to exclude. I would also love to keep videos on there and have my apps down to about 2GB.. I did try the 128Kbps conversion option as that would solve my problem and 99.9% of my listening is on apple earbuds, BUT the implementation is flawed at least for iphone in that it recompresses the audio EVERY TIME your content on the phone changes.... recompressing 29GB of music every single sync is... well.... :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol sums it up nicely.

so 64GB would let me keep my whole library on my phone, give me room for a dozen or so ripped movies or half a dozen digital copies, and still leave me more than enough room for apps, pics, and personal video. Sounds about right to me. :)

flsh said:
So a slightly smaller screen (according to leaks), but a huge upgrade in resolution? Seems a bit weird.
most logical conclusion is that apple is limited on the screens available to them closest to those specs. the reports indicate that the size difference isn't even noticeable without direct comparison or measuring.. not at all worried, but I sure as hell can't wait to see the quality of it in action. :D
 

obaidr

Banned
They patented FB integration? Does it mean we android user will never get a real fb app now? God i hate apple more then hitler.
 

RubxQub

φίλω ἐξεχέγλουτον καί ψευδολόγον οὖκ εἰπόν
obaidr said:
They patented FB integration? Does it mean we android user will never get a real fb app now? God i hate apple more then hitler.
Android phones have had FB integration for awhile now.

...surely this means Apple can be reduced down to "Geobbels" instead of elevated to Hitler status?
 
Wellington said:
16 Gigs is so restricting. :(
I have a giant music library, but the only time I listen to my iPod on my iPhone is when I'm working out. So that usually means I have ~6GB of metal, hard rock, etc.
But then again I'm somewhat of an audiowhore so the earbuds, etc. don't cut it for me.

And I'm on the David Lynch side of the camp when it comes to movies on a phone. But eh, to each their own.

darkwing said:
so when do you think Apple will show this baby?
At WWDC, June 7th-11th. Somewhere between there. The rumor is that it's expected to come out in June, even as early as a week after the announcement.

obaidr said:
They patented FB integration? Does it mean we android user will never get a real fb app now? God i hate apple more then hitler.
Quit your whining. They touted 200+ patents with the original iPhone. Just because they apply doesn't mean they get them.
This is just Facebook. I'd be more concerned about Google getting into the energy commodification business, but that's just me...
 

flsh

Banned
borghe said:
most logical conclusion is that apple is limited on the screens available to them closest to those specs. the reports indicate that the size difference isn't even noticeable without direct comparison or measuring.. not at all worried, but I sure as hell can't wait to see the quality of it in action. :D
Oh I'm not complaining. If the bump in resolution is really this significant a millimeter or two aren't going to make any difference. I'm quite in love with the idea that the iPad and iPhone resolutions are going to be similar. Would make emulating iPhone apps really amazing on it.
 

Blackhead

Redarse
I like the size of the screens. The phones fit comfortably in my pocket. I've long given up the idea of watching feature films on the device and it's good enough for the odd streaming video
 

RubxQub

φίλω ἐξεχέγλουτον καί ψευδολόγον οὖκ εἰπόν
TurtleSnatcher said:
I hope the YT app gets a bit beefier.. The quality seems so bad now I barely even use it. :(
Not really a limitation of the app. It should be scaling in quality depending on how good your connection is.

Over WiFi it should be fairly solid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom