iceatcs
Junior Member
It is weak ass promise to me. They just said "could". I suspect people are looking for PR disaster just like other having problem recently.But you can't do it now.
It is weak ass promise to me. They just said "could". I suspect people are looking for PR disaster just like other having problem recently.But you can't do it now.
I'm a little bit disappointed with the quality of PS+ on PS4 when you have the best on PS3/Vita it's hard to be impressed with the PS4 offering ... I think i prefer a full indie game than a glorified demo ...
What do you expect? The PS4 isn't even a year old....some of you guys are way too demanding
Where do you expect them to pull the titles from? Thin air?...there is not exactly a large pool of titles to pick from here...the PS3 offerings are much more robust because the consoles catalog was huge when PS+ was launched...I'm a little bit disappointed with the quality of PS+ on PS4 when you have the best on PS3/Vita it's hard to be impressed with the PS4 offering ... I think i prefer a full indie game than a glorified demo ...
I'm loving the amount of entitlement, here.
Are people seriously complaining? ITS FREE.
People complaining about a cut-down free version of a game?
Pretty good for free.
driveclub ----free. this is an awesome deal
Free game is cool stuff.
Its free, just take whats given
At least it's free
But crying over something free is ridiculous
are we really going to lose sleep considering it's free?
I would ask not to be lied to, but maybe I'm weird to expect things like that.
It might be a good value, or might not. I just wish people would stop calling games on a subscription "free".
Just like movies on Netflix or financed phones on contract aren't "free".
In any case, it gives people the right to complain if they think they aren't getting enough value.
When people say free, they obviously mean at no extra cost. You already know that though.
they should release the ps+ version after e3. could help hyping the full game until october.
I'm a little bit disappointed with the quality of PS+ on PS4 when you have the best on PS3/Vita it's hard to be impressed with the PS4 offering ... I think i prefer a full indie game than a glorified demo ...
Free literally means at no extra cost. Why would that need to be clarified and how does that take away from his point?
What about comparing it to Vita then?The PS4 catalog is very small at this point, you can't compare to the PS3 that has 7 years of catalog.
It might be a good value, or might not. I just wish people would stop calling games on a subscription "free".
Just like movies on Netflix or financed phones on contract aren't "free".
In any case, it gives people the right to complain if they think they aren't getting enough value.
Free literally means at no extra cost. Why would that need to be clarified and how does that take away from his point?
I just wish people would stop calling games on a subscription "free".
What is the correct adjective for something 'taken' from a library? On Netflix people just call it streaming, in physical libraries I think I'd say 'I got this from the library'. Neither really applies here.What would you (or anybody else) suggest for a precise term that could be used for games that you can access as a subscriber of PS+?
Until there's a better word, I choose to call the games "free" out of convenience. I trust the listeners/readers to understand what I mean in the context.
Well Sony needs to pay for those added development costs, need people to buy the game. Sony is losing me. I still think it's the best option for me, but with the PS4 plus offerings so far, this announcement, studio layoffs and project cancellations, they have fallen a lot from where the company was prior to the PS4 launch. IF The Order ends up getting delayed, which I think is a possibility than I would consider the PS4's first year and Sony's effort a complete failure.
Infamous is great, but when the PS4 was announced and through E3 of last year and beyond Sony was just hyping and hyping and so far they haven't really delivered anything.
I'm not saying the console is failure or anything like that, or that Sony is done etc Just that I feel that Sony did not live up to the expectations they set.
'games that do not require an additional charge over and above that of my Playstation Plus subscription in order to play them until such a time as my Playstation Plus subscription expires'.What would you (or anybody else) suggest for a precise term that could be used for games that you can access as a subscriber of PS+?
Until there's a better word, I choose to call the games "free" out of convenience. I trust the listeners/readers to understand what I mean in the context.
Well Sony needs to pay for those added development costs, need people to buy the game. Sony is losing me. I still think it's the best option for me, but with the PS4 plus offerings so far, this announcement, studio layoffs and project cancellations, they have fallen a lot from where the company was prior to the PS4 launch. IF The Order ends up getting delayed, which I think is a possibility than I would consider the PS4's first year and Sony's effort a complete failure.
Infamous is great, but when the PS4 was announced and through E3 of last year and beyond Sony was just hyping and hyping and so far they haven't really delivered anything.
I'm not saying the console is failure or anything like that, or that Sony is done etc Just that I feel that Sony did not live up to the expectations they set.
Seems to me Sony pulled a 180 on what was promised based on what they said in 2013 before it was delayed.
They raised expectations to create a buzz for the game (and PS+) so fair game if they're called out on that.
Tired of companies overhyping their products and then they can't be criticized.
They said I'd be able to platinum the game with the PS+ version. If I can do that, I'm fine, if not, I'll be raising a stink.
Ugh, over a promised free to Plus members game? That's hyperbole.
And you still can. Nothing has changed.
And you still can. Nothing has changed.
I do not know if they have. If they have then yes you would have justification to moan, because it is either true or false, 0 or 1. Not any decimal point in between.Have they confirmed the platinum is even still possible? If you can't play in 4 of the 5 countries how can you get a platinum? I look forward to finding out this too got changed and being told by the Sony apologists that I am an entitled whiner.
I'm not too concerned with Driveclub PS+ having content cut, I'm worried that other games will follow suit
And you still can. Nothing has changed.
So this:And you still can. Nothing has changed.
What on earth. I don't even...
This sentence makes no sense. For Sony, or for the PS4 owner, it's two separate questions. Sony is having an astounding first year, they've done nothing, and they can't make the consoles fast enough.explain me to how that was a successful launch year for Sony? From a consumer prospective.
Here's a different take and also not even on topic. Pathetic.
You can call it a "rental". Its a far more accurate term than calling them "free".What would you (or anybody else) suggest for a precise term that could be used for games that you can access as a subscriber of PS+?
Until there's a better word, I choose to call the games "free" out of convenience. I trust the listeners/readers to understand what I mean in the context.
people still flipping their shit over this, it was ANNOUNCED as a cut down version of the full game the time to be "outraged" was back at e3 last year not now.
This sentence makes no sense. For Sony, or for the PS4 owner, it's two separate questions. Sony is having an astounding first year, they've done nothing, and they can't make the consoles fast enough.
Do we know the full car and track list? I haven't seen one so how can you say 'half the content removed'?People are flipping shit because they went from "slightly scaled down" initially to mean more than half the content removed which we learnt recently, not because it is a scaled down version alone.
How is it not on topic? Driveclub on PS plus was a selling point that Sony used for the PS4. The delayed the game almost a year and now are giving a game that's closer to a demo, not saying it's demo but it's closer to a demo than a full game. To me that's just one more in a string of bad moves on Sony's part. If you don't agree, that's fine but back up your opinion. What has Sony done for consumers in the PS4's first year?
Because 'for Sony?' and 'From a consumer perspective' is contradictory.How does it make no sense? Sony the company is having a great year I acknowledge that, but how has that been for the consumer?
Do we know the full car and track list? I haven't seen one so how can you say 'half the content removed'?
You can call it a "rental". Its a far more accurate term than calling them "free".
People are flipping shit because they went from "slightly scaled down" initially to mean more than half the content removed which we learnt recently, not because it is a scaled down version alone.
because you don't pay for the games, period.Free literally means at no extra cost. Why would that need to be clarified and how does that take away from his point?
They said you getWhen was it "slightly scaled down"? the only thing ever said about it was that you can get the plat trophy in the PS+ version which doesnt tell you how much content there is at all, really.
The platinum is "hours played" isn't it?