I'm starting to lean toward this as this device would basically be incompatible with the engines most major developers are making these days for next-gen systems.Proelite said:Either msnerd fucked up
I'm starting to lean toward this as this device would basically be incompatible with the engines most major developers are making these days for next-gen systems.Proelite said:Either msnerd fucked up
Nirolak said:I'm starting to lean toward this as this device would basically be incompatible with the engines most major developers are making these days for next-gen systems.
Proelite said:For you people that thinks that loop will be xboxtv, you do realize that it packs a radically new Ai chip, and a radically new physics physics chip? Ask yourself why would a xboxtv need that?
Either msnerd fucked up or this is the xbox successor.
It was the courier and the courier team moved on to work on the next Xbox when Allard was kicked out.The Shift said:ps there was a tablet concept from MS maybe 4-5 years ago, I remember seeing a video of it back then. Anyone remember this?
That is pretty goodULTROS! said:Xbox Loop?
[Nintex] said:It was the courier and the courier team moved on to work on the next Xbox when Allard was kicked out.
I guess MS will gun for both the high end and the low end market but I still think they'll release a next gen machine by the end of 2012.
Why stop there? If we wait till 2020 I bet next gen would have some really cool shit.thuway said:I would rather wait for a late 2014 console than one in 2013. Technology has not matured enough to see an appreciable visual difference worth shelling out another 399. The Samaritan demo wasn't even that impressive to me. Hopefully in late 2014 we can push boundaries further.
bigtroyjon said:Why stop there? If we wait till 2020 I bet next gen would have some really cool shit.
thuway said:I would rather wait for a late 2014 console than one in 2013. Technology has not matured enough to see an appreciable visual difference worth shelling out another 399. The Samaritan demo wasn't even that impressive to me. Hopefully in late 2014 we can push boundaries further.
Nirolak said:I'm starting to lean toward this as this device would basically be incompatible with the engines most major developers are making these days for next-gen systems.
Yes but what if MS did follow this route and PS4 was a monster that could give us everything we wanted and more, imagine the faceoffs and pixel counters?1-D_FTW said:Other than Epic, would any developer really care if they joined Nintendo in opting out of the arm's race?
And if they did, wouldn't the Sony developers in Japan beg Sony not to go nuclear in their PS4 design?
Dead giveaway that this is a load of bullshit.wannabe nerd said:dedicated assistive cores for <...> AI, physics
I actually don't know what you are saying. There has been discussion of when the next consoles would be releasing ever since the gen started and every time we get posts from people saying "Don't release it in year 20xx, release it one year later so the hardware is better."thuway said:You know exactly what I'm saying. Diminishing returns are rearing their ugly heads, and in all honesty, if these companies want a small stab at making a profit and making a generational leap in visuals, than they better take their damn time.
Rolf NB said:Dead giveaway that this is a load of bullshit.
Multi-GPU is bullshit too. So is the idea of dedicated physics processors. Why would you include chips that can only do one thing, when you already, at a bare minimum, haveProelite said:If msnerd fucked has any credibility, I would assume that this is his way of overreaching beyond his knowledge base. The loop might have a lot of campanion cores, but I doubt any of them would be doing ai.
If the Loop detail is reliable, then I would be pretty impressed that MS is using new architecture. It certainly sounds in line with Epic and Dice's comments about the next generation consoles having lots of cores / gpus.
3D chip packaging is only a marginal power reduction, but actually increases power density (=> cost of [first layer of] cooling systems), and is itself more expensive to manufacture than traditional options. I really don't see it helping with typical console limitations. Board space isn't as much at a premium as in handheld/phone-type devices. Power consumption and cost are much further up the list.They can use 3D POP or 3D ICs to lower power consumption and die space in a small console profile.
Uh...Luckyman said:haha.. its all over. Loop = XboxTV with kinect?
LeadGandalf said:So two more years of this gen? What are they thinking?
Nuclear Muffin said:This seems likely. I said before that MS might consider making the 360 successor into a glorified cable box (complete with cable card slot), with most major game series becoming subscription services (perhaps offering package deals alongside actual cable/satellite TV channels)
If COD Elite is a success, then this will definitely happen. Graphics have nowhere to go really (it's good enough for most people now), this is the next step.
Shanadeus said:2013 means a console that is power-wise quite close to the Wii U.
eastmen said:I fully expect MS to design and ship a $500 system that sells for $400
Pretty sure that would just be a code name anyway.Arpeggio23 said:Xbox Infinity would be a great name. Loop? Not so much.
Proelite said:Not happening because they don't need to.
They'll make the cheapest system that they can that allows them to do these things graphically:
1. Support the latest DirectX.
2. Be substantial leap over the 360, and to some extent the Wii-U.
They can do that with a $300 system and still make money in 2013.
Proelite said:Not happening because they don't need to.
They'll make the cheapest system that they can that allows them to do these things graphically:
1. Support the latest DirectX.
2. Be substantial leap over the 360, and to some extent the Wii-U.
They can do that with a $300 system and still make money in 2013.
eastmen said:I disagree . MS is going to watn their system to last longer than the xbox 360 does. They already see this generation that you can keep the price high through the generation.
The xbox 360 launched at $300/$400 and still sells for $200 to $450 6 years later
Something Wicked said:They're looking to knock-out either Nintendo or Sony or both from the video game console manufacturing business. If successful, their Xbox division would become very profitable in the not-too distant future.
Proelite said:I don't think anyone knows what will happen in the next ten years in the console industry. Some industry shifting event could happen that totally shorten the lifespan of the next Xbox, i.e. streaming games becoming ubiquitous. Having an obsolete, money bleeding console on the market would look pretty stupid then. That's something that Sony, not MS, would do.
The next Xbox should at least break even out of the gate at $399. With $399 price tag, it can be probably be as powerful as its power consumption requirements allow at 150-200W.
Two words:Proelite said:Depends on the power draw of the Wii U and the Loop. The Wii was <20W compared to the 175W of the 360. If Wii U has a comparable power draw to Loop, then the Wii U would be comparable, unless Nintendo is going with 45nm for all the chips, in which the loop would be easily 3-4 times more powerful in the same power package.
Shanadeus said:Two words:
Liquid Cooling.
Shanadeus said:2013 means a console that is power-wise quite close to the Wii U.
just like how the 360 was quite close power-wise to the wii, right? ;PShanadeus said:2013 means a console that is power-wise quite close to the Wii U.
FoxSpirit said:Picked up a rumour: the XBox successor is supposedly announced before the year is over.
I can't completele vouch for the source except that he does know the right people and has 0 reasons to lie to me.
I'm curious.
FoxSpirit said:Picked up a rumour: the XBox successor is supposedly announced before the year is over.
I can't completele vouch for the source except that he does know the right people and has 0 reasons to lie to me.
I'm curious.
No, a bit more personal :laughs:Proelite said:Was this the uncle of your sister's friend?