and they have to pay taxes on top of it
I imagine a bunch of the stuff was free, given for publicity reasons.
200k would change my life right now. For them, it's just a gift bag. This world is bananas sometimes. I understand the reasoning behind why they receive such gifts, but it doesn't make it easier to process.
Hollywood stars are now responsible for random companies marketing and advertisement they have no say in?Shit like this pissed me off, I wish I had the power to take everything they owned and use it for something useful.
Well, that's my point. The amount of money being spent on these exorbitant gift bags. Offers and items that most of which are of no use to the people they are giving it to.Well it's just estimated value, it's not like they get 200k in cash, most of these gifts are worthless garbage
I have no envy of them being rich or popular at all. You get what you earn
Eh, that's not really true, not when talking about these extremely lucky people. Not saying there isn't any talent involved, but there are thousands or even millions of people who could have been one of these people had they only been in the right place at the right time, or born to the right parents or whatever. But they weren't, so they never will be, no matter what they do or how talented they are. You can't just say "you get what you earn", as if everyone who isn't getting all of that just didn't work hard enough for it. All these famous and very rich people (which, granted, not every Oscar nominee necessarily is - yet) arguably get far more than they "earn" by any reasonable standard.
OK WTF is going on here!?
What do you mean? It's a long running notion and is even poked fun of at the Oscars by hosts. Lighten up.
Most of it is only costing money when they use it. I doubt all of them are going on a 55.000 Japan hiking trip for example. If it is no use to them, money hasn't even been spent on it (outside of the deal with the Oscars to get into the gift bag).Well, that's my point. The amount of money being spent on these exorbitant gift bags. Offers and items that most of which are of no use to the people they are giving it to.
These gift bags are attempts to advertise products/services by a variety of companies. If you can get a celebrity to use your thing, it usually gives your business a boost. I often see people think that award ceremony attendees are just being showered with gifts for being fabulous, but that's not exactly the rationale behind it.
It's almost certainly less conspiratorial than you think. It's probably just a travel agency that specializes in in Israel ponying up an expensive enough of a trip to be included.Seriously, I'd like to know which Zionist group pulled favours to have a trip to Israel be included in that package.
Eh, maybe. I'm sick and grumpy, and the connection of Jewish = Israel always bugs me. Don't mean to be sensitive.
I don't think Leo was there for the gift bag...
Golden Globes 2.0 right there.
A 10-day, first-class trip to Israel ($55,000)
What do you think? Is it too much?
Edit: Not all, but just the acting and directing nominees get the gift bag apparently.
Link
The Daily Beast
I'm not getting the criticism to the Israel trip.
Very wacky. You can disagree with a country's foreign policy but still be curious from a tourists perspective. Lots of history there.
Some of you have some strange objections.
I'm not getting the criticism to the Israel trip.
Very wacky. You can disagree with a country's foreign policy but still be curious from a tourists perspective. Lots of history there.
Some of you have some strange objections.
Shit like this pissed me off, I wish I had the power to take everything they owned and use it for something useful.
Shit like this pissed me off, I wish I had the power to take everything they owned and use it for something useful.
He can't believe he'll receive his Oscar the same night she gets hersI hope not
And they say Oscar nominations ain't worth shit..
Lol talk about a strawmanThink it has to do with "Jews" running Hollywood mentality.
It's called boycott and in that case it's a UN-enabled terrorist stateRight, Israel is a beautiful country with a rich history. Someone gives you a free first class trip and 10 day tour, I'm not turning it down because I don't agree with the politics
It's called boycott and in that case it's a UN-enabled terrorist state
What about this thread makes you think it's an appropriate place to drag that argument in?
Hollywood leftist types have been pretty pro Palestinian state, though.Why wouldn't it be? They're giving away free first class tickets to a trip to Israel, to all the attendees of the Oscars, that means producers, directors, actors, publishers everything. Some of the most powerful people in media, with huge amounts of influence and sway. The subject of Israel's political situation seems more poignant than ever given the context no?
I hope a trip to Palestine is included, though of course it won't be. It will be the complete opposite, completely ignoring the tremendous strife, land left and punishment the state is placing on their neighbour. You have to wonder if any of the hotels or places these Oscar attendees will visit in Israel will actually be in occupied territories.
Hollywood leftist types have been pretty pro Palestinian state, though.
Why wouldn't it be? They're giving away free first class tickets to a trip to Israel, to all the attendees of the Oscars, that means producers, directors, actors, publishers everything. Some of the most powerful and/or popular people in media, with huge amounts of influence and sway. The subject of Israel's political situation seems more poignant than ever given the context no?
It's a vacation to promote Israeli tourism. Are cruise companies being dishonest by only taking passengers to the beautiful parts of the Caribbean?I hope a trip to Palestine is included, though of course it won't be. It will be the complete opposite, completely ignoring the tremendous oppression, strife, land left and punishment the state is placing on their neighbour. You have to wonder if any of the hotels or places these Oscar attendees will visit in Israel will actually be in occupied territories.
I don't equate tourism with foreign policy personally.Which is why I'm both especially interested in what becomes of this, and highly cynical too. Clearly a move by Israel (whether co-ordinated by the government, it's tourism sectors, lobbies, corporations, or who knows) to try and usher a change of tune and of hearts and minds.
These are only being given to the acting and directing nominees...
It's a vacation to promote Israeli tourism. Are cruise companies being dishonest by only taking passengers to the beautiful parts of the Caribbean?
Well, my point was that when you said that they were giving free trips to Israel to all Oscars attendees, that was wrong. Like, really, really, really wrong. Incredibly wrong. Really hard to be more wrong. Almost impressively wrong.Ok, and actors and directors don't have massive influence? What's your point?
Israel is just another holiday destination. There are countries all over the world whose government are participating in massively horrible things, but no one really questions the morality of simply visiting these places. If I go to see the Great Wall, I am NOT supporting China's expansionist policies in Southeast Asia. Obviously.And of course it's a vacation to promote Israel, but it is questionable that the Oscars allowed it given the political ramifications and current situation surrounding Israel's illegal occupation and expansion of territories. They are unique to any other nation in the world in that regard.
And what an absolutely nonsense comparison with the Caribbean. Is the Caribbean currently occupying or stealing foreign land, expanding settlements illegally, responsible for the displacement of millions of civilians, the segregation and degradation of an entire people etc? I mean, it's essentially an Apartheid regime the Oscars are allowing freebie trips to. Think about the bigger picture. It's not just another holiday destination.
Heck my own country bombs innocent civilians.
You'd really be limiting yourself travelwise if that was a big consideration.
Well, my point was that when you said that they were giving free trips to Israel to all Oscars attendees, that was wrong. Like, really, really, really wrong. Incredibly wrong. Really hard to be more wrong. Almost impressively wrong.
That was it, just a matter of clarification.
Israel is just another holiday destination. There are countries all over the world whose government are participating in massively horrible things, but no one really questions the morality of simply visiting these places. If I go to see the Great Wall, I am NOT supporting China's expansionist policies in Southeast Asia. Obviously.
And what an absolutely nonsense comparison with the Caribbean. Is the Caribbean currently occupying or stealing foreign land, expanding settlements illegally, responsible for the displacement of millions of civilians, the segregation and degradation of an entire people etc? I mean, it's essentially an Apartheid regime the Oscars are allowing freebie trips to. Think about the bigger picture. It's not just another holiday destination.
There is no other country in the world, to my knowledge, that is doing what Israel is doing. They have taken public action and government policy to a whole new heinous level. And no, Israel is not just another holiday destination, just as Iraq or Syria aren't. Extreme political infractions or policies that lend to the displacement, imprisonment, segregation, starvation or death of hundreds of thousands or millions of innocent people, cannot simply be ignored or brushed aside simply because other countries also do some bad (though not nearly as bad) shit. That's a ridiculous notion to me, and completely devoid of context and morality.
An acceptable choice, especially since they aren't currently illegally occupying another country, oppressing its people and etc.
You really want to get into this argument here? What about the Palestinians stabbing an 11 year old boy or a pregnant woman or a mother stabbed to death in front of her children? Is there really only your side to this conflict?
And what does this have to do with the Oscars anyway?
The Oscars are giving away free tickets to Israel, therefore by nature it has to do with both Israel and the Oscars. There are political ramifications to this decision that do not apply to Japan for example, which is why no one Mt his thread has raised an eye brow to it, whilst several have to Israel.
It's called boycott and in that case it's a UN-enabled terrorist state
The Oscars are not giving anything away. An independent company puts these packages together.
It's a vacation. It's not a big deal. It's attitudes being demonstrated in this thread that really do damage to your cause. Instead of acting like you have reasonable, legitimate criticisms of Israeli government policy, you just spew this toxic hate that makes you very hard to agree with.
And this is coming from someone who has been called anti-semitic by members of his own family for his views on the Israeli government's actions.
Your last point... is that like a 'I'm not racist I have Black friends' thing? What does it matter if other people have called you anti semitic? How does that change the context of this conversation? For all we know those people may have been horribly misusing the term, using it in a completely false context. They may have even misunderstood you, or may just be super pro Israeli. None of that has any baring on our conversation.
And obviously a company, lobby, group or government is actually forking out for the goodies, but it's still the Oscars giving it away by allowing it to be a part of the gift bag. They have the ultimate say in what goes in or out of that bag of goodies after all.
I also don't see how I'm spewing toxic hate just by stating the truths about Israel's on going heinous and massively criminal foreign policies. You always hear about threats of nations wiping other nations off the map, well you know what, Israel is actually doing just that, and has been doing that for the longest time, and it's this nonchalant passive attitude that hasn't exactly helped diminish it. It's about time more people were vocal about it, and people are right to question this inclusion.