They would have than not gone forward in the tournament they were in. The other team forfeiting is not a positive thing here, it would have fucked the team with the women on it over. They had to get more goals to go forward, and the other team forfeiting wouldn't have let that happen.
Could have,, I'm looking at the stats.
Basically it looks like they were in a one day 8 team quarter final tournament. Teams are divided into two Pools A and B, everybody plays 3 times (one game against each team in your pool), teams can tie in those games which play a factor, and like the girls knew as do goals for and this is interesting it seems goals against. At th end of the day the semi-finals are set for another day:
Playoffs go Top Team of A vs 2nd Team of B and Top Team of B vs Second Team of A
The Robert Hall finished 2-0-1 with 11 goals 2 Against for first in Pool A
ISNA finished 1-1-1 with 4 goals 8 Against for second in Pool B
So in the end the 3 extra goals didn't actually make a difference but here's the ting, the Hall vs ISNA game was both team's second game and both had previous tied their last game Hall 1-1 vs JSF ISNA 0-0 against Bronte (the other two teams in their Pool)
Also going into this game Robert Hall knew that JSF (the team they tied) had beaten Bronte so if they ended up tied Hall would not have the head to head and thus goals for and against would matter. So at the time of that game, at the moment to make that decision, the girls chose to sacrifice their principles to ensure the team would have it's best shot of advancing, because had things got even ever so slightly differently (had they lost to Brone or had JSF beaten ISNA) they'd have been tied and it'd have come down to goal differential. The girls wanted to keep their team's destiny in their own hands. SO had the coach said fuck no and they missed out either on a better seed or the semis altogether the guilt on those girls (unfairly we know) would have been hard to swallow.
And that's the story on that.